Sentences with phrase «lex machina»

MENLO PARK, CA, October 14, 2014 — Lex Machina, creator of Legal Analytics ®, announced today that its Chief Evangelist & General Counsel Owen Byrd, General will be speaking at the upcoming Eastern District of Texas 2014 Bench Bar Conference.
«We're honored that Ralph Baxter, whom I've known and respected for many years, is joining our board to help shape the vision and direction of Lex Machina at a time of tremendous growth for the company,» said Josh Becker, CEO.
Analytics tools such as those used by Ravel and other start - ups including Casetext, Judicata, JustisOne and Lex Machina greatly reduce the amount of time and money that lawyers need to spend on legal research - an area that has not traditionally been seen as an area where savings can be made.
Initial employment litigation findings uncoverd by Lex Machina, based on cases filed between January 1, 2009 through June 30, 2017, include:
First there are his VC skills that he honed before joining Lex Machina, while he also remains close to many investors and is a Vice President with the Stanford Angels and Entrepreneurs.
«We're confident that his original thinking and unparalleled business expertise will prove a perfect fit for Lex Machina's needs now and in the days ahead.
The only product of its kind, Lex Machina provides a trusted platform for the world's leading legal teams, including counsel for Google, Nike, SAP, and many AmLaw 100 firms.
Lex Machina will hold a live webcast on February 23, where two PTAB experts — Amy Simpson, Patent Litigation Group Chair at Perkins Coie, and Naveen Modi, Global Vice Chair Intellectual Property at Paul Hastings — will discuss the contents of the new report with Owen Byrd.
Since January 1, 2009, more than 289,200 product liability cases were filed in District Court, involving products classified by Lex Machina as medical devices or pharmaceuticals, including MDL - associated cases.
The first company to introduce Legal Analytics to law firms and companies, Lex Machina provides a trusted platform for the world's leading legal teams, including counsel for Google, Nike, SAP and many AmLaw 100 firms.
Lex Machina's unique platform includes hundreds of thousands of docket entries and documents from more than 2,500 ANDA cases filed since January 1, 2000.
But, before we end, Artificial Lawyers asks about the legal tech Accelerator that LexisNexis announced last year, which will be working closely with Lex Machina out in California.
Menlo Park, CA — January 21, 2016 — Lex Machina, a LexisNexis company and creator of Legal Analytics ®, today announced the release of its latest report on Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) litigation.
Once again, the program will be led by Lex Machina CEO Josh Becker and LexisNexis» Chief Product Officer, Jamie Buckley, Vice President of US Product Management, Jeff Pfeifer, Chief Technology Officer, Jeff Reihl, and Lex Machina Chief Evangelist, Owen Byrd.
The stakes are high for plaintiffs and defendants,» said Owen Byrd, Chief Evangelist and General Counsel of Lex Machina.
For more information about Lex Machina's newest practice area, please follow this link for Lex Machina's employment litigation launch webcast, scheduled for July 13 at 9:00 PDT / 12: 00 EDT.
The Lex Machina team uses machine - learning techniques to identify specific legal terms and phrases and then builds natural - language processing algorithms to encode the results.
On this front AI seems to have made the most progress, with outfits like Lex Machina and LexisNexis's Verdict & Settlement Analyzer building enormous databases of litigation histories and applying advanced analytics to tease out how a postulated scenario might fare.
The result is «this ontology of terms that has been developed over the years» and continues to be refined every night, when the system crawls the Web to collect the latest data, says Owen Byrd, Lex Machina's chief evangelist and general counsel.
Lex Machina's Legal Analytics for Trademark Litigation enables attorneys and mark owners for the first time to make data - driven decisions about federal trademark case strategy and tactics.
Many of Lex Machina's new Analytics pages, public reports, and services engagement reports use median figures as a way to help summarize data, showing, for example, the time - to - trial for a particular judge as a median number.
Register online to download the Lex Machina Trademark Litigation Report to see all the data and analysis.
Leading the stampede into the Tyler district were what Lex Machina calls «high - volume plaintiffs,» or patent owners that file more than 10 cases in a calendar year.
Register here for Lex Machina's half - hour launch webcast entitled «Legal Analytics for Antitrust Litigation,» scheduled for November 17th at 11:00 am PST (2:00 pm EST).
Menlo Park, CA, October 26, 2017 — Lex Machina, a LexisNexis company and creator of the award - winning Legal Analytics ® platform, today released findings from its first annual report on Bankruptcy Litigation in District Court.
Lex Machina's Legal Analytics for district court bankruptcy appeals provides valuable data - driven insights and trends into the unique characteristics that separate bankruptcy appeals from all other federal practices.
Lex Machina's data is focused on the U.S. District Courts, and does not include U.S. Bankruptcy Court cases, U.S. Court of Appeals cases, or state court cases.
New data from the legal analytics firm Lex Machina suggests that the newfound judicial hostility toward software patents is making plaintiffs gunshy:
Brian Howard, legal data scientist at Lex Machina, commented, «The report shows off the various aspects of Lex Machina's data — case filings, districts and judges, parties, and firms, outcomes.
• New data source and case linking: Existing Lex Machina case data is integrated with data from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to provide accurate MDL case counts.
«My guess is that, rightly or wrongly, [plaintiffs] have read the tea leaves,» said Owen Byrd, Lex Machina's general counsel.
Lex Machina's First Annual Report on Bankruptcy Litigation in District Court Provides Insights and Data About the Complex World of Bankruptcy Appeals
We're the moneyball of IP litigation,» says Josh Becker, Lex Machina's CEO.
That number jumped to 451 for the years 2014 to 2015, in a sign that «the pharmaceutical industry is feeling greater urgency and things are getting more intense,» Brian Howard, legal data scientist for Lex Machina, told the publication Corporate Counsel.
Lex Machina is excited to announce the launch of the Legal Analytics Brief, a free monthly newsletter where you get insights, news, resources, and tips about winning in the highly competitive business and practice of law.
So how does Lex Machina do what it does?
«Commercial litigation is by far Lex Machina's biggest, most ambitions endeavor yet because its all - encompassing nature transcends so many other legal practices.
Lex Machina's tool is only one of several related to searching and collating information about patent suits, as opposed to just information on patents alone.
Last year LexisNexis acquired Lex Machina, an AI - powered engine that applies natural language processing to public court documents to predict outcomes in intellectual property litigation.
Today, Lex Machina is focused on providing our customers with the winning edge in the business and practice of law, but we remain committed to being a source of publicly available, highly reliable data — helping lawmakers and analysts better understand the major trends and issues in the patent litigation landscape.
Lex Machina is in the vanguard of an emerging field known as legal analytics, according to Daniel Martin Katz, an associate professor of law at Michigan State University who writes the blog Computational Legal Studies and advocates overhauling the practice of law through technology.
Lex Machina's integration of District Court, PTAB, and ITC analytics enables practitioners to thoroughly evaluate the litigation history of a patent and quickly plan winning strategies.
Just like the sabermetrics described in Moneyball, Lex Machina's database can aid in the formulation of broad strategy as well as the selection of players, says Becker.
One of the newest such bullets in the clip is a Demand Letter Analytics Tool now being offered by legal analytics outfit Lex Machina, available from the list of third - party tools mentioned in the United States Patent and Trademark Office's toolkit for how to respond to demand letters or lawsuits.
Innovators at Stanford's Computer Science Department and Law School developed Lex Machina's Legal Analytics ® platform to provide more openness and transparency in intellectual property law.
Leveraging Lex Machina's experience with natural language processing techniques, this feature processes docket text and the signature blocks of individual case documents to create a level of detail never before possible.
New Capabilities Help Deliver on President Obama's Executive Actions to Assist Recipients of Patent Infringement Demand Letters Today is an exciting day for Lex Machina, as we announce our efforts to support the American innovation community through a new initiative to provide free, public information to businesses and everyday consumers who may receive patent infringement demand letters.
Lex Machina's database is available to anyone who can afford its annual fee.
Menlo Park, CA, May 1, 2015 — Lex Machina announced today the release of the first comprehensive Trademark Litigation Report, analyzing key metrics including filings, findings, remedies, and damages in trademark cases pending from 2009 through the first quarter of 2015.
Drawing on data from Lex Machina's proprietary intellectual property litigation database, these quantified insights into time - to - injunction, findings of infringement or fair use, and damages won can be used to help attorneys budget cases and craft winning strategies for trademark litigation.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z