And to be honest, I'm not entirely sure that there exists a unified
libertarian position on whether such «first claim» property ownership should or should not be taxed.
During the leadership race, however, David Davis led the party towards
a libertarian position on ID cards and the issue of 42 days.
Indeed, it is arguably even possible to sympathize with
the libertarian position on judicial review and yet argue that in some types of cases, courts should be more deferential than in others; or at least I have taken this position, though perhaps I'm just a faint - hearted libertarian.
Not exact matches
The Texas senator had carefully struck a balance between the various facets of the GOP,
positioning himself as traditionally conservative
on most issues, but one with a
libertarian streak.
Here is a post from
Libertarian News that begins, «I recently got into an argument over
on the Reddit Bitcoin boards where I held the
position that fractional reserve banking with Bitcoins was not possible,» which sounds fun; he recants that view but does make what I think is a very valid point:
Atheism is just a belief
position on gods, and atheist could, theoretically, believe in all manner of supernatural things, like crystals,
libertarian free will, or qi.
[1]- Ironically, many true liberals in classical liberalism sense are currently trying to re-brand things back, by reclaiming «liberal» label for their left -
libertarian positions (one of the most notable examples is Dave Rubin), while branding former - progressives - now - called - «liberals» as «progressive» again,
on the basis that current US progressive movement is claimed by many to be against many individual rights and the basis of classical liberalism
Leaving aside current legalities and treaties between existing states, is there a «standard»
position that the
libertarian worldview would take
on someone taking ownership of a piece of property that was «common», or «unowned», before?
This race just got very personal for Davis, who is running for the
position on the
Libertarian ticket.
By now you will have understood that I am sympathetic to the
libertarian position, and I wonder whether the debtors» friends in Congress have a covert agenda, namely to keep those with poor credit from taking
on debt even when these debtors are fully informed of the risks and costs and quite willing to bear them.
Their
position is driven by Culture War animosity towards greens, scientists, do - gooders and so
on, or by ideological commitment to a conservative /
libertarian position that would be undermined by the recognition of a global problem that can only be fixed by changes to existing structures of property rights.
This is a curious
position for
libertarians to take in that they do not usually qualify their support for property rights based
on where those rights are held.
But Jerry Taylor, a senior fellow at the
libertarian Cato Institute said «scientists are in no
position to intelligently guide public policy
on climate change.»
Our co-blogger Randy Barnett is arguing for the first time before the U.S. Supreme Court
on Monday in the marijuana cases, taking the liberal,
libertarian pro-drug rights
position.
Colorado's
libertarian streak can also be seen in the state's
position on the grace period for late premium payments.