Sentences with phrase «likert scale items»

The PSI is a self - report questionnaire composed of 120, 5 - point Likert scale items covering parental and child dimensions related to parenting stress (Reitman, Currier, & Stickle, 2002).

To create the latent aspects, the mean scores of the items were summed up to Likert scale items.

Not exact matches

The 39 potential items on the survey were constructed using a Likert - type scale ranging from a low score of 1 (least likely to be a trend) to a high score of 10 (most likely to be a trend).

While all the key questions are reported, the two questions that are averaged for each course have the following stems and utilize the same five - item Likert - like scale (strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree, strongly disagree).

They rated student engagement on a 6 - point scale that asked teachers to estimate what percentage of the class was actively engaged, and authentic instruction was measured on a 9 - point Likert Scale that contained seven items corresponding with the principles behind the concept of authentic instruction and piloted during the Fall 2007 semescale that asked teachers to estimate what percentage of the class was actively engaged, and authentic instruction was measured on a 9 - point Likert Scale that contained seven items corresponding with the principles behind the concept of authentic instruction and piloted during the Fall 2007 semeScale that contained seven items corresponding with the principles behind the concept of authentic instruction and piloted during the Fall 2007 semester.

All of the items on the survey produced response means between 5.0 and 6.0, with a median standard deviation of 1.095, on a 7 - point Likert - type scale.

The version of the survey used in this study has 18 items and uses a 6 - point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 6 (strongly agree).

Chan, J. C. (1996) Estimating the Latent Trait from Likert - type Data: A Comparison of Factor - Analysis, Item Response Theory, and Multidimensional Scaling.

The OCI - R is an 18 - item self - administered questionnaire designed to assess distress associated with obsessive - compulsive symptoms each item is rated on a five - point (0 - 4) Likert scale for distress or bother during the past month.

These items were rated along a 10 - point Likert - type scale.

The items on the CATI are rated on a Likert - type scale from 1 = Strongly false, 2 = More false than true, 3 = More true than false, to 4 = Strongly true.

The Connors - Davidson Resilience Scale (CD - RISC) is a short self - report questionnaire that it can measure Resilience and it is consisted of 25 items which are rated on a 5 - point Likert scale (0 Scale (CD - RISC) is a short self - report questionnaire that it can measure Resilience and it is consisted of 25 items which are rated on a 5 - point Likert scale (0 scale (0 - 4).

These items were assessed along a 7 - point Likert - type scale.

The German «Fragebogen zur Erfassung von Ressourcen und Selbstmanagementfähigkeiten — Gesamtressourcen» (FERUS, Questionnaire for the Assessment of Resources and Self - Management Abilities — common resources), 51 consisting of the subscales «coping», «self - awareness», «self - efficacy», «self - verbalisation» and «hope» (44 items, 7 - point Likert scale), was applied for the assessment of personal resources.

Many studies also investigated the secondary outcome of women's satisfaction with their decision to hold or have other contact with the baby, typically measured through a study - specific, single Likert - scale item.

The Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) 52 assesses the frequency of mindful states, with higher levels indicating greater mindful awareness (15 items, 6 - point Likert scScale (MAAS) 52 assesses the frequency of mindful states, with higher levels indicating greater mindful awareness (15 items, 6 - point Likert scalescale).

The items are scored on a five - point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much).

The five other items probe behaviours and are coded on a 5 - point Likert scale ranging from 1 «never» to 5 «always».

Emotional acceptance: Emotional acceptance was measured with the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire - II, a 10 - item questionnaire using a 7 - point Likert scale (1 = never true, 7 = always true).28 The scale measures experiential avoidance; items were reversed to obtain a measure of acceptance.

The primary outcome, reduction of depressed mood, was measured by the short form of the German translation of the Center for Epidemiological Studies - Depression (CES - D) scale.45 This questionnaire assesses depression associated emotions and motor functions, as well as interactive, cognitive and somatic symptoms on a 16 - item 4 - step Likert scale.

Each item is rated for frequency of use on a 6 - point Likert scale ranging from 1 «never in the past 4 weeks» to 6 «twice a day».

Two of the items probe beliefs and are coded on a 5 - point Likert scale ranging from 1 «disagree» to 5 «agree».

This is a 26 - item tool in which the respondent is asked to indicate the frequency of adopting 26 positively stated lifestyle habits using a Likert - type scale (1 = Never or rarely, 2 = Sometimes, 3 = Often and 4 = Always).

It contains 10 items on a 5 - point Likert scale.

Item 19 is rated on a 4 - point Likert scale rating of overall sleep quality ranging from 0 «very good» to 3 «very bad.»

c) Compliance consist of 23 items using a 3 - item Likert scale (every time (3), sometime (2), and never (1)-RRB-.

We also used the Emotion Regulation Scale, 29 a 7 - item questionnaire using a 7 - point Likert scale (1 = strongly agree, 7 = strongly disagree) to assess the suppression of emotions (4 - item Expressive Suppression subscale), reflecting less emotional acceptScale, 29 a 7 - item questionnaire using a 7 - point Likert scale (1 = strongly agree, 7 = strongly disagree) to assess the suppression of emotions (4 - item Expressive Suppression subscale), reflecting less emotional acceptscale (1 = strongly agree, 7 = strongly disagree) to assess the suppression of emotions (4 - item Expressive Suppression subscale), reflecting less emotional acceptance.

The 25 items are rated on a 10 - point - Likert scale (from 0 «not focus on this at all», to 100 «focus on this to a great extent»).

To test the proposed mediators of change in relatives» outcomes, we will also include Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire, 43 a 15 - item Likert scale assessing beliefs about psychosis / BD with an additional single item, to assess perceived coping; and Brief COPE, 44 a 28 - item measure widely used to assess coping styles.

This instrument was originally developed by Lyubomirsky and Lepper23 and is composed by four items responded on a 7 - point Likert scale.

It is a 10 - item Likert - type scale including the following statements:

Items are rated on a 5 - point Likert scale, from «not true at all» (0), to «true nearly all of the time» (4).

It consists of 21 items and these items are rated on a Likert - type scale from 0 («Not At All») to 3 («Severely - it bothered me a lot»).

The 21 items are rated on a four - point Likert scale assessing intensity / frequency of distress (from 0 = did not apply to me at all to 3 = applied to me very much, or most of the time) over the past week.

Participants were asked to rate these 29 items on a Likert - type scale from 0 («Extremely uncharacteristic») to 4 («Extremely characteristic»).

Each dimension has 18 items, to be scored on a Likert scale, ranging from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating higher levels of insecure attachment on the respective dimension.

Items involve questions about typical behaviours or reactions, which are answered on a five - point Likert scale, ranging from «strongly disagree» to «strongly agree».

Responses are rated using an 8 - point Likert scale, from 1 (Definitely False) to 8 (Definitely True), such that scores can range from a low of 8 to a high of 64, since four items are fillers.

Respondents were asked to rate the extent to which each item described them on a 5 - point Likert scale ranging from 1 (very much unlike me) to 5 (very much like me).

The Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWL)[13] is a Likert - type, 5 - item questionnaire designed to measure satisfaction with life as a whole.

Four items are rated on a 7 - point Likert scale (from 1 = not a very happy person to 7 = very happy person).

For example, when conflicts with others arise, individuals who use negative coping will ignore the opposing side for a long time.50 Each item is rated on a 5 - point Likert Scale.

First, students answered each item on a 5 point, rather than 4 point Likert - type scale, ranging from 1 = Not at all true to 5 = Exactly true.

Students rated each item on a 5 - point Likert - scale ranging from 1 = Disagree very much to 5 = Agree very much.

The Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale (RDAS)[12] is a widely used 32 - item measure of relationship quality based on Likert - type ratings of criteria such as agreement on activities and issues such as sex relations, philosophy of life, and religious matters.

The PANAS Questionnaire (Watson, Clark, & Tellegen, 1988) that was provided in its Greek version, comprises 20 items with two dimensions, with 10 items for positive and 10 items for negative affect (e.g. «Active», «Disturbed»), using a modified Likert - type scale, ranging from 1 (very slightly or not at all) to 5 (extremely).

The Greek version of the Hope Scale (HS; Snyder et al., 1991; Moustaki & Stalikas, 2012) was used to measure individuals» sense of successful goal - directed determination and planning of ways to meet goals using eight items rated on a 4 - point Likert scale ranging from «Definitely False» to «Definitely True&raScale (HS; Snyder et al., 1991; Moustaki & Stalikas, 2012) was used to measure individuals» sense of successful goal - directed determination and planning of ways to meet goals using eight items rated on a 4 - point Likert scale ranging from «Definitely False» to «Definitely True&rascale ranging from «Definitely False» to «Definitely True».

The Meaning in Life Questionnaire (MLQ; Steger, Frazier, Oishi, & Kaler, 2006) is designed to measure the presence of meaning (how much respondents feel their lives have meaning) and the search for meaning in life (how much respondents strive to find meaning and understanding in their lives) using 10 items rated on a 7 - point Likert - type scale ranging from 1 (Absolutely True) to 7 (Absolutely Untrue).

The Inspiration Scale (IS; Thrash & Elliot, 2003) measures the frequency and the intensity in which individuals feel inspired using eight items rated on a 7 - point Likert scale, where higher scores reflect higher levels of inspiration (e.g., «I experience inspiraScale (IS; Thrash & Elliot, 2003) measures the frequency and the intensity in which individuals feel inspired using eight items rated on a 7 - point Likert scale, where higher scores reflect higher levels of inspiration (e.g., «I experience inspirascale, where higher scores reflect higher levels of inspiration (e.g., «I experience inspiration.

The Life Orientation Test (LOT; Scheier & Carver, 1985) examines individual's tendency to believe that he / she will experience good or bad outcomes in his / her life using eight items rated on a 5 - point Likert scale ranging from «Totally Disagree» to «Totally Agree» (e.g., «In Uncertain times, I usually expect the best»).