Sentences with phrase «likert scale ranging»

Items are rated on a 4 - point Likert scale ranging from wholly not true / never or seldom (0) to completely true / very frequently (3).

Participants» level of need threat [91] was assessed after the game using a Likert scale ranging from 1 (don't agree at all) to 7 (totally agree).

Items are completed on a Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly low) to 4 (strongly high).

All variables were coded on a 5 - point Likert scale ranging from 1 (none) to 5 (high).

The item «I was ignored» on the questionnaire following the cyberball game acted as a manipulation check to ensure that ostracism was recognized as such (Likert scale ranging from 1 (don't agree at all) to 7 (totally agree)-RRB-.

Items are rated on 5 - point Likert scale ranging from «never» to «often» or from «not characteristic» to «very characteristic», according to the occurrence of problematic behaviors in the child.

Adolescents reported, on a five - point Likert scale ranging from 1 (disagree strongly or very bad idea) to 5 (agree strongly or very good idea), on their attitudes toward sex (e.g., «Not having sex will help me feel good about myself») and on their attitudes about using condoms (e.g., «How do you feel about using a condom if you had sex in the next 3 months?»).

Respondents are asked to rate each item on a 5 - point Likert scale ranging from 1 (extremely dissatisfied) to 5 (extremely satisfied).

Then, respondents rated the degree to which the father's involvement was helpful in promoting family coping with the illness, again on a five - choice Likert scale ranging from «harder» to «much easier.»

Participants were asked to indicate how often such events occurred on a Likert scale ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (always) with higher scores reflecting a greater number of negative life events.

All items are scored using a six - point Likert scale ranging from 1 (I do not agree) to 6 (I totally agree).

Items are scored on a five - point Likert scale ranging from «never» to «at least once a day.»

Family Support Scale (FSS), developed by Dunst, Trivette and Jenkins in 1984, includes 19 items that are rated on a five - point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all helpful) to 5 (extremely helpful).

Participants are asked to rate items using a Likert scale ranging from 1 (very false) to 4 (very true) with higher scores reflecting a greater level of perceived control.

Participants indicated their agreement to the statements on a 5 - point Likert scale ranging from «Strongly Disagree» to «Strongly Agree», with a neutral response option in the middle.

Participants are asked to answer on a 5 - point Likert scale ranging from 5 (extremely important / strongly agree) to 1 (not at all important / strongly disagree).

Participants were asked to answer on a 4 - point Likert scale ranging from 0 (completely disagree) to 3 (strongly agree).

All items were rated on a five - point Likert scale ranging from «Completely not agree» (1) to «Completely agree» (5).

First, respondents rated the frequency with which the father performed that task in the prior 6 months on a five - choice Likert scale ranging from 1, «never» to 5, «always.»

These ratings indicate how frequently the mothers display a number of parenting behaviors toward the target child, on a 5 - point Likert scale ranging from never to always.

Parents report, on a five - point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (always) regarding whether they reward their child for appropriate behaviors.

The participants rated their feeling toward a partner on the items using a 1 — 5 Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5).

It comprises of 125 - items to be answered on a 5 - point Likert scale ranging from very dissatisfied to very satisfied that are grouped into 14 domains; Idealistic Distortion, Marital Satisfaction, Personality Issues, Communication, Conflict Resolution, Financial Management, Leisure Activities, Sexual Relationship, Children and Parenting, Family and Friends, Equalitarian Roles, Religious Orientation, Marital Cohesion and Marital Change (Fowers & Olson, 1989).

2) Brazilian version of a general scale of relationship satisfaction (Schumm et al., 1986), translated and validated in a sample of 342 participants with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of.90 (Wachelke, De Andrade, Souza, & Cruz, 2007), a measure composed by three items [«I am satisfied with my relationship», «I am satisfied with my companion in what concerns his / her role in the relationship» and «I am satisfied with my relationship with my companion»] completed in a 5 - point Likert scale ranging from 1 = «strongly disagree» to 5 = «strongly agree».

The FAM III General Scale is a 50 - item self - report measure of family functioning answered on a four - point Likert scale ranging from «strongly disagree» to «strongly agree» (Bloom, 1985; Skinner et al., 2000).

The mean pain intensity score on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 10 was 7.30 (SD = 1.51) and the average disability in ICPs was 7.23 (SD = 1.09).

Respondents were asked to rate each statement on a 7 - point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 7 (always).

17 items rated on a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 7 and summed to produce a total score, which can range from 17 to 102.

Respondents answer using a 5 - point Likert scale ranging from «Yes: fits our family well» through to «No: does not fit our family».

The FACES IV is a 42 - item self - report measure of family functioning answered on a five - point Likert scale ranging from «strongly disagree» to «strongly agree».

The FAD is a 60 - item self - report measure of family functioning answered on a four - point Likert scale ranging from «strongly agree» to «strongly disagree» (Akister & Stevenson - Hinde, 1991).

Answers are given on a five - point Likert scale ranging from «0» to «5 times or more».

Participants respond on a 6 - point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree, separately for the father and the mother.

Each item was responded to on a five point Likert scale ranging from 0 = almost never to 4 = almost always, and mothers were asked to indicate how different issues, such as «Disagreement over household rules» or «We undermine each other» had been a problem for her and her partner over the last month.

Preferences were rated on a 7 - point Likert scale ranging from 1 (Very Unimportant) to 7 (Very Important).

The Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS; Diener, Emmons, Larsen, & Griffin, 1985) examines the global assessment of a person's quality of life using five items rated on a 7 - point Likert scale ranging from «Strongly Disagree» to «Strongly Agree (e.g., «I am satisfied with my life»).

The participants rated to what extent that each item was applicable, on a five - point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (extremely).

The Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS; Diener, Emmons, Larsen, & Griffin, 1985) examines the global assessment of a person's quality of life according to his / her chosen criteria using five items rated on a 7 - point Likert scale ranging from «Strongly Disagree» to «Strongly Agree (e.g., «I am satisfied with my life»).

The Life Orientation Test (LOT; Scheier & Carver, 1985) examines individual's tendency to believe that he / she will experience good or bad outcomes in his / her life using eight items rated on a 5 - point Likert scale ranging from «Totally Disagree» to «Totally Agree» (e.g., «In Uncertain times, I usually expect the best»).

The Greek version of the Hope Scale (HS; Snyder et al., 1991; Moustaki & Stalikas, 2012) was used to measure individuals» sense of successful goal - directed determination and planning of ways to meet goals using eight items rated on a 4 - point Likert scale ranging from «Definitely False» to «Definitely True».

Respondents were asked to rate the extent to which each item described them on a 5 - point Likert scale ranging from 1 (very much unlike me) to 5 (very much like me).

A likert scale ranging from 1 (never do) to 5 (always do) was chosen for its ease of use for both the assessors and the respondents.

Responses were on a Likert scale ranging from 1 («not at all») to 9 («extremely»).

Two of the items probe beliefs and are coded on a 5 - point Likert scale ranging from 1 «disagree» to 5 «agree».

Each item is rated for frequency of use on a 6 - point Likert scale ranging from 1 «never in the past 4 weeks» to 6 «twice a day».

Respondents were asked to indicate the propensity of their responses on a Likert scale ranging from 1, rarely, to 5, always.

Women respond using a 5 - point Likert scale ranging from 1 «strongly disagree» to 5 «strongly agree».

The five other items probe behaviours and are coded on a 5 - point Likert scale ranging from 1 «never» to 5 «always».

The items are scored on a five - point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much).

Women were asked how they felt about breastfeeding during the first week after birth on a 5 - point Likert scale ranging from «disliked very much» to «liked very much.»