I had no idea a blog post written tongue - in - cheek about whether women should marry attractive men or not would create such a furor — Jezebel thinks I'm blaming women for men's bad behavior (I'm not); Rush
Limbaugh thinks I'm a militant feminist (wow, is he ever wrong, but I already knew that about him); the ladies of «The View» debated it; Shannon Devereaux Sanford interviewed me for her show, Shannon's Corner on WTBQ in New Jersey; the podcast «The Bold and the Beautiful» talked about the column (they called me a «great» columnist!)
If
Limbaugh thinks he has all the damn answers, then let's see if he can put his ba «lls where his mouth is.
As if the Pope would give a hoot about what someone like Rush
Limbaugh thinks.
Who cares what Rush
Limbaugh thinks about the pope?
Why in god's name does anyone on planet earth care about what Rush
Limbaugh thinks?
WHY in the name of any shred of professional journalism is what Rush
Limbaugh thinks headlining CNN.com??
Not the socially conservative, servant of feel good capitalism that is so prevalent in the U. S. And let's look at it this way, if that mysoginist, drug addicted coward, Rush
Limbaugh thinks what the Pope is doing is socialism, then the Pope must be doing something right.
Not exact matches
Do you
think Rush
Limbaugh speaks for me or everyone else?
But as a person who never
thought Rush
Limbaugh (in the 1990s) or Glenn Beck (in the 2000s) ever said much that should have been taken seriously by anyone (but who has simultaneously seen these selfsame characters taken seriously despite the obvious surface objections to them), Hunstman may not be caught in the snares of his own hunt for the presidency yet.
Rush
Limbaugh is so far from Christian it is difficult for me to believe that anyone would
think that listening to his show would do any good for their soul.
I was trying to
think of ways in which
Limbaugh might be a useful human being.
At least
Limbaugh nailed the fact that his
thinking is absurd.
Another one of
Limbaugh's DITTO HEADS — you know, the ones that can't
think for themselves and have to rely on
Limbaugh for their
thought process.
Well that's the genius of
Limbaugh — he doesn't take himself seriously — he sees himself as an entertainer — it's the dumma * ses that follow him that
think everything he says is gospel.
If you somehow
think this was appropriate, you are no better than
Limbaugh.
In their mind, they probably
think Jesus is like Rush
Limbaugh and the Koch brothers.
Do the opinions of MSNBC, Fox News, Rush
Limbaugh and Rachel Maddow over-determine my
thoughts about communities and individuals who I have yet to take the risky initiative to journey across town, or across the street to actually meet?
What a surprise Georgetown backs Fluke, I
thought they would back
Limbaugh.??
I
think you have been listening to Rush
Limbaugh or something...
Sometimes, Rush
Limbaugh would be better served if he just kept some of his
thoughts to himself.
If people started to change things in order to better protect and improve their real economic situation, and not the economic situation they
think they might one day have,
Limbaugh would definitely stand to lose.
I
think Limbaugh is against Jesus as well.
Palin, Varney, and now
Limbaugh have opened the eyes of good people who
thought their values paralleled their own.
I wasn't
thinking highly of the new pope, but hearing
Limbaugh trash him has made me
think again — maybe he's a good pope after all.
I
think Limbaugh is a deciple of Hitler.
So I guess according to
Limbaugh and his ilk's way of
thinking The Christ was REALLY just a raving socialist / communist / marxist h $ ll bent on destroying the capitalistic, wildly unequal, and therefore «just», Roman Empire and the entire wealthy, powerful, and thus «successful», Jewish hierarchy because he was «jealous» of them and their «success» and so actually deserved to be put to death for it.
That's why people tack labels onto Historical fig - ures, like calling Washington a «Born Again Christian» as
Limbaugh does, in order to misrepresent those peoples views as supporting what the people of today
think.
I
thought I made it clear that while I doubt many of these people (
Limbaugh, Beck etc.) really believe some of the things they say, I
think they need to be aware that there are people out there listening who may be a few bricks short of a stack.
For a doctor - shopping drug addict like
Limbaugh to
think he can make Pope Francis heel to his warped view of life is pathetic to the point of sickening.
I respect the work of Sharpton and Jackson but unlike most of you who feel that
Limbaugh's word is gospel most of us Blacks are quite capable of
thinking on our own.
Wendy... you must
think the rest of us are morons and that we don't read the paper about Idaho trying to pass a mandatory ultrasound law, Texas losing federal funding because it wants to choke off Planned Parenthood, Rush
Limbaugh's disgusting attack on Sandra Fluke (and women who use the Pill in general).
I
think it's so funny seeing Sarah Palin & that fat idiot
Limbaugh claiming they're the new leaders of a group of people who don't have a clue about anything.
Rush
Limbaugh pretends, out loud, to
think Obama is like Hitler.
I'd like to
think that Rush
Limbaugh was floating a
thought experiment, and not seriously proposing something, when he told millions of listeners the following: «Mr. Revkin, why don't you just go kill yourself, and help the planet by dying.»
The result, once the reverberating blogosphere ramped up the sound bites and eliminated the context, was Mr.
Limbaugh's challenge — or was it, in fact, a
thought experiment?
The only amusing thing about this followup statement is how closely it resembles the semi-non-apology Rush
Limbaugh offered his listeners last year a week after he proposed that I kill myself if I really
think human population growth is bad for the planet.
On the other, he's a lightning rod because people a) they hate anything Rush
Limbaugh tells them to and b) he's simplified the science to the point where people who don't know better can poke holes in it and
think they're right.
They were getting nowhere until Morano got a great idea at the Republican Convention of 1992 — he asked politicians what they
thought of the new Rush
Limbaugh TV show, then sold the footage to the new Rush
Limbaugh TV show.
It sounds as if everything you
think you know about how «people like me»
think comes from Rush
Limbaugh or Glenn Beck or some such person who spend most of their time giving their creative versions of what people on the other side of the divide
think.
And those
thoughts (not actions) were expressed in private, not on a blog or in the press or on TV — quite different from
Limbaugh's, Beck's, Inhofe's and Morano's incitations to violence in public forums.
«I bought into Rush
Limbaugh's view that the environmentalist movement was «the new refuge of socialist
thinking,»» he tells me.
On the April 22 edition of his show,
Limbaugh touted the Duke University study as» [b] ad news for the climate change crowd» and claimed the Duke researchers are part of a «consensus» of people who
think «there isn't any warming going on.»
Still, it was only after Rush
Limbaugh decided to weigh in on this pressing matter in the legal profession that we
thought it worth pointing out.