Sentences with phrase «litigation technology experience»

Litigation Technology Experience: Experience creating project plans, selecting vendors and developing review protocols.

Not exact matches

Actual results, including with respect to our targets and prospects, could differ materially due to a number of factors, including the risk that we may not obtain sufficient orders to achieve our targeted revenues; price competition in key markets; the risk that we or our channel partners are not able to develop and expand customer bases and accurately anticipate demand from end customers, which can result in increased inventory and reduced orders as we experience wide fluctuations in supply and demand; the risk that our commercial Lighting Products results will continue to suffer if new issues arise regarding issues related to product quality for this business; the risk that we may experience production difficulties that preclude us from shipping sufficient quantities to meet customer orders or that result in higher production costs and lower margins; our ability to lower costs; the risk that our results will suffer if we are unable to balance fluctuations in customer demand and capacity, including bringing on additional capacity on a timely basis to meet customer demand; the risk that longer manufacturing lead times may cause customers to fulfill their orders with a competitor's products instead; the risk that the economic and political uncertainty caused by the proposed tariffs by the United States on Chinese goods, and any corresponding Chinese tariffs in response, may negatively impact demand for our products; product mix; risks associated with the ramp - up of production of our new products, and our entry into new business channels different from those in which we have historically operated; the risk that customers do not maintain their favorable perception of our brand and products, resulting in lower demand for our products; the risk that our products fail to perform or fail to meet customer requirements or expectations, resulting in significant additional costs, including costs associated with warranty returns or the potential recall of our products; ongoing uncertainty in global economic conditions, infrastructure development or customer demand that could negatively affect product demand, collectability of receivables and other related matters as consumers and businesses may defer purchases or payments, or default on payments; risks resulting from the concentration of our business among few customers, including the risk that customers may reduce or cancel orders or fail to honor purchase commitments; the risk that we are not able to enter into acceptable contractual arrangements with the significant customers of the acquired Infineon RF Power business or otherwise not fully realize anticipated benefits of the transaction; the risk that retail customers may alter promotional pricing, increase promotion of a competitor's products over our products or reduce their inventory levels, all of which could negatively affect product demand; the risk that our investments may experience periods of significant stock price volatility causing us to recognize fair value losses on our investment; the risk posed by managing an increasingly complex supply chain that has the ability to supply a sufficient quantity of raw materials, subsystems and finished products with the required specifications and quality; the risk we may be required to record a significant charge to earnings if our goodwill or amortizable assets become impaired; risks relating to confidential information theft or misuse, including through cyber-attacks or cyber intrusion; our ability to complete development and commercialization of products under development, such as our pipeline of Wolfspeed products, improved LED chips, LED components, and LED lighting products risks related to our multi-year warranty periods for LED lighting products; risks associated with acquisitions, divestitures, joint ventures or investments generally; the rapid development of new technology and competing products that may impair demand or render our products obsolete; the potential lack of customer acceptance for our products; risks associated with ongoing litigation; and other factors discussed in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including our report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended June 25, 2017, and subsequent reports filed with the SEC.
My first few years of law practice involved financial litigation, so by the time I learned about bitcoin, I had accumulated the perfect mix of interests and experience to get excited about the technology.
Tim's background as an experienced litigation attorney and network administrator, provide him the skills to bridge legal work with technology.
This experience allows us to handle any facet of complex business and technology litigation, including:
Our areas of experience include business, technology, intellectual property, real estate, land use, energy, environmental, water resources, labor, school districts, products liability, personal planning and all aspects of commercial litigation.
Joining from K&L Gates LLP, Ratinoff has more than 15 years of experience representing clients in technology - driven litigation in state and federal trial and appellate courts, as well as the International Trade Commission.
Alex is an experienced IT professional with particular expertise in e-discovery and litigation related technology.
Our lawyers have significant experience in assisting our clients protect and develop the full value of their intellectual property by prosecuting and defending copyright and trademark infringement cases, unfair competition actions, Internet and technology disputes, franchise disputes, false advertising claims, litigation concerning trade secrets and restrictive covenants, and other claims relating to intellectual property.
Mr. Chen has extensive experience in helping high - tech companies in Silicon Valley and China on building comprehensive patent portfolios and developing sophisticated international patent strategies, assessing, avoiding and responding to third - party IP threats, inter partes reviews (IPRs) and reexaminations at the patent office, district court patent litigation, in - bound and out - bound technology licensing, and negotiating IP asset transactions such as mergers, acquisitions, joint ventures and the like.
Our global footprint, experience in many forums and expertise across a diverse array of technologies and industries position our trade secrets litigation lawyers to handle the enforcement or defense of trade secrets claims of any stripe.
Angileri's litigation experience spans across various technologies and industries including, automotive, consumer electronics, industrial technologies, food and beverage, and home appliances.
Over 9 years of experience advising and servicing lawyers and their clients in the management of evidence through the use of technology in cross border litigation, regulatory review, and investigations.
Foley Hoag's Litigation team was described as having ``... strong experience representing companies in the life sciences, technology and energy industries... a well - known and respected firm with a deep bench of efficient litigators.»
Tufts has more than 15 years litigation experience in the areas of contract disputes, real property rights, enforcement of commercial guaranties and security interests, enforcement of intellectual property rights, fraud, unfair competition, unjust enrichment, technology disputes, construction matters, mechanics liens enforcement, employment disputes, and real property matters.
Our technology clients benefit from the unique blend of our commercial litigation, intellectual property and professional malpractice experience.
He has over eight years of experience in e-discovery and litigation technology.
Ms. Raney is an attorney licensed in Arizona with years of experience in the areas of eDiscovery and litigation, including technology aided document review in many complex civil litigation cases using such document review platforms as Catalyst ®, Kroll Ontrack ®, Ringtail ®, Concordance ®, Clearwell ®, Relativity ® and Summation ®.
The successful resolution of a patent dispute requires a unique blend of skill, understanding and experience in litigation, patent practice and technology.
Connect your firm with process servers who embrace technology, have experience with high volume servers and understand the litigation process and rules of properly effectuating service.
Our intellectual property (IP) lawyers are experienced and effective advocates with a pragmatic perspective informed by years of complex litigation experience involving a wide range of technologies and a keen understanding of the business world.
Dan practiced as a litigation lawyer for a number of years and has extensive experience with legal technologies, having been Manager of Information Systems at his firm.
With over 10 years of experience in production management, project management, and litigation support technology, Karen works with clients and her team to ensure a quality product that will consistently meet or exceed client expectations.
Mitchell has over 2 decades of experience in litigation support and legal technology.
Allieri will be Regional Vice President of the New York City office, and brings 20 years of experience in litigation support and document - related technologies to D4, including extensive work with major law firms and corporate law departments.
He has considerable experience of litigation conducted in the Technology and Construction Court and all methods of alternative dispute resolution.
Marc's litigation experience spans across various technologies and industries.
With over 20 years of experience in litigation support and document - related technologies, Paul Allieri has spent a large portion of his career assisting and supporting major law firms and corporate law departments.
In a very topical application of data analytics, US employment leader Littler has announced the launch of the Littler Pay Equity Assessment, which combines the 1300 + lawyer firm's experience in employment law and compensation with proprietary technology to identify pay gaps and, ergo, risks of litigation.
Using our wide - ranging litigation experience and business savvy, Carr Maloney represents clients in sophisticated copyright, trademark, licensing, e-commerce, unfair competition, Internet and technology law matters.
Hal Brooks is an eDiscovery and Litigation Technology professional with more than 25 years» experience.
«We leveraged our intellectual property and litigation experience, and embraced technology and electronic project management.
Brian Ingram is a litigation technology and eDiscovery professional with over 20 years» experience in the legal profession.
A good number were individuals with years of litigation support experience, who picked up a lot of technology and law over the years, were detail oriented yet personable, but had no formal training in any «related» field.
He has extensive experience in all aspects of intellectual property practice, including IP litigation, patent procurement, technology transfer and licensing, and due diligence for corporate transactions.
His patent litigation experience also extends to a wide range of other technologies, including consumer electronics, specialty chemicals, automotive parts, financial services, medical devices, as well as software and web services.
«Jamie's experience in the litigation services arena is unparalleled, helping organizations to both develop their overall discovery strategy and address their day - to - day discovery and litigation challenges through the effective balance of people, processes and technology,» Rowe said.
He has significant experience in oil and gas, bankruptcy and insolvency litigation, energy, insurance coverage, technology and intellectual property disputes.
With more than 20 years of experience practicing in the area of intellectual property litigation, Angileri has lead council for a wide variety of clients that spreads across various technologies and industries including, automotive, consumer electronics, industrial technologies, food and beverage and home appliances.
Our lawyers have extensive experience in technology, banking and finance, consumer protection, employment, international law, intellectual property, health care, and litigation.
His practice areas and experience cover commercial intellectual property advice, IP litigation, advertising law and litigation, advice on drafting and / or negotiation of information technology agreements on seller or buyer side, and advice on the protection and enforcement of trade mark, patent, copyright and industrial designs.
Our IP and IT Litigation Group is composed of lawyers with a wide range of experience in the constantly evolving fields of information technology, e-commerce, and intellectual property.
In my experience, many litigation attorneys are slow to adopt new technology.
Our litigation lawyers are able to offer clients the benefit of global experience and familiarity with local courts and practices, which enables us to present complex technology issues in a form that any judge or jury can understand.
Stokes Carmichael & Ernst LLP is an Atlanta - based general civil litigation firm with experience in business law, creditor rights and collection, employment and labor law, business litigation, securities arbitration and financial services litigation, personal injury claim, franchise law and technology law.
Her litigation experience has involved a wide range of technologies, from battery spill - containment devices to online computer software.
Through our use of web - based tools and other technologies, CSI meets the needs of clients in litigations of all sizes, while leaning on our extensive and invaluable experience to provide a superior and focused level of service.
Mr. Chen is experienced in patent litigation, patent office trials, client counseling, infringement and validity analysis, and patent prosecution in a range of technologies, including telecommunications, networking, electronic circuitry, semiconductor devices, software, and medical devices.
In addition to intellectual property litigation, Rob has extensive experience managing patent portfolios of large and small technology companies.
Additional industry areas of his patent litigation experience include automotive mirror products, bar code and machine vision technology and arcade games.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z