Litigation Technology Experience: Experience creating project plans, selecting vendors and developing review protocols.
Not exact matches
Actual results, including with respect to our targets and prospects, could differ materially due to a number of factors, including the risk that we may not obtain sufficient orders to achieve our targeted revenues; price competition in key markets; the risk that we or our channel partners are not able to develop and expand customer bases and accurately anticipate demand from end customers, which can result in increased inventory and reduced orders as we
experience wide fluctuations in supply and demand; the risk that our commercial Lighting Products results will continue to suffer if new issues arise regarding issues related to product quality for this business; the risk that we may
experience production difficulties that preclude us from shipping sufficient quantities to meet customer orders or that result in higher production costs and lower margins; our ability to lower costs; the risk that our results will suffer if we are unable to balance fluctuations in customer demand and capacity, including bringing on additional capacity on a timely basis to meet customer demand; the risk that longer manufacturing lead times may cause customers to fulfill their orders with a competitor's products instead; the risk that the economic and political uncertainty caused by the proposed tariffs by the United States on Chinese goods, and any corresponding Chinese tariffs in response, may negatively impact demand for our products; product mix; risks associated with the ramp - up of production of our new products, and our entry into new business channels different from those in which we have historically operated; the risk that customers do not maintain their favorable perception of our brand and products, resulting in lower demand for our products; the risk that our products fail to perform or fail to meet customer requirements or expectations, resulting in significant additional costs, including costs associated with warranty returns or the potential recall of our products; ongoing uncertainty in global economic conditions, infrastructure development or customer demand that could negatively affect product demand, collectability of receivables and other related matters as consumers and businesses may defer purchases or payments, or default on payments; risks resulting from the concentration of our business among few customers, including the risk that customers may reduce or cancel orders or fail to honor purchase commitments; the risk that we are not able to enter into acceptable contractual arrangements with the significant customers of the acquired Infineon RF Power business or otherwise not fully realize anticipated benefits of the transaction; the risk that retail customers may alter promotional pricing, increase promotion of a competitor's products over our products or reduce their inventory levels, all of which could negatively affect product demand; the risk that our investments may
experience periods of significant stock price volatility causing us to recognize fair value losses on our investment; the risk posed by managing an increasingly complex supply chain that has the ability to supply a sufficient quantity of raw materials, subsystems and finished products with the required specifications and quality; the risk we may be required to record a significant charge to earnings if our goodwill or amortizable assets become impaired; risks relating to confidential information theft or misuse, including through cyber-attacks or cyber intrusion; our ability to complete development and commercialization of products under development, such as our pipeline of Wolfspeed products, improved LED chips, LED components, and LED lighting products risks related to our multi-year warranty periods for LED lighting products; risks associated with acquisitions, divestitures, joint ventures or investments generally; the rapid development of new
technology and competing products that may impair demand or render our products obsolete; the potential lack of customer acceptance for our products; risks associated with ongoing
litigation; and other factors discussed in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including our report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended June 25, 2017, and subsequent reports filed with the SEC.
My first few years of law practice involved financial
litigation, so by the time I learned about bitcoin, I had accumulated the perfect mix of interests and
experience to get excited about the
technology.
Tim's background as an
experienced litigation attorney and network administrator, provide him the skills to bridge legal work with
technology.
This
experience allows us to handle any facet of complex business and
technology litigation, including:
Our areas of
experience include business,
technology, intellectual property, real estate, land use, energy, environmental, water resources, labor, school districts, products liability, personal planning and all aspects of commercial
litigation.
Joining from K&L Gates LLP, Ratinoff has more than 15 years of
experience representing clients in
technology - driven
litigation in state and federal trial and appellate courts, as well as the International Trade Commission.
Alex is an
experienced IT professional with particular expertise in e-discovery and
litigation related
technology.
Our lawyers have significant
experience in assisting our clients protect and develop the full value of their intellectual property by prosecuting and defending copyright and trademark infringement cases, unfair competition actions, Internet and
technology disputes, franchise disputes, false advertising claims,
litigation concerning trade secrets and restrictive covenants, and other claims relating to intellectual property.
Mr. Chen has extensive
experience in helping high - tech companies in Silicon Valley and China on building comprehensive patent portfolios and developing sophisticated international patent strategies, assessing, avoiding and responding to third - party IP threats, inter partes reviews (IPRs) and reexaminations at the patent office, district court patent
litigation, in - bound and out - bound
technology licensing, and negotiating IP asset transactions such as mergers, acquisitions, joint ventures and the like.
Our global footprint,
experience in many forums and expertise across a diverse array of
technologies and industries position our trade secrets
litigation lawyers to handle the enforcement or defense of trade secrets claims of any stripe.
Angileri's
litigation experience spans across various
technologies and industries including, automotive, consumer electronics, industrial
technologies, food and beverage, and home appliances.
Over 9 years of
experience advising and servicing lawyers and their clients in the management of evidence through the use of
technology in cross border
litigation, regulatory review, and investigations.
Foley Hoag's
Litigation team was described as having ``... strong
experience representing companies in the life sciences,
technology and energy industries... a well - known and respected firm with a deep bench of efficient litigators.»
Tufts has more than 15 years
litigation experience in the areas of contract disputes, real property rights, enforcement of commercial guaranties and security interests, enforcement of intellectual property rights, fraud, unfair competition, unjust enrichment,
technology disputes, construction matters, mechanics liens enforcement, employment disputes, and real property matters.
Our
technology clients benefit from the unique blend of our commercial
litigation, intellectual property and professional malpractice
experience.
He has over eight years of
experience in e-discovery and
litigation technology.
Ms. Raney is an attorney licensed in Arizona with years of
experience in the areas of eDiscovery and
litigation, including
technology aided document review in many complex civil
litigation cases using such document review platforms as Catalyst ®, Kroll Ontrack ®, Ringtail ®, Concordance ®, Clearwell ®, Relativity ® and Summation ®.
The successful resolution of a patent dispute requires a unique blend of skill, understanding and
experience in
litigation, patent practice and
technology.
Connect your firm with process servers who embrace
technology, have
experience with high volume servers and understand the
litigation process and rules of properly effectuating service.
Our intellectual property (IP) lawyers are
experienced and effective advocates with a pragmatic perspective informed by years of complex
litigation experience involving a wide range of
technologies and a keen understanding of the business world.
Dan practiced as a
litigation lawyer for a number of years and has extensive
experience with legal
technologies, having been Manager of Information Systems at his firm.
With over 10 years of
experience in production management, project management, and
litigation support
technology, Karen works with clients and her team to ensure a quality product that will consistently meet or exceed client expectations.
Mitchell has over 2 decades of
experience in
litigation support and legal
technology.
Allieri will be Regional Vice President of the New York City office, and brings 20 years of
experience in
litigation support and document - related
technologies to D4, including extensive work with major law firms and corporate law departments.
He has considerable
experience of
litigation conducted in the
Technology and Construction Court and all methods of alternative dispute resolution.
Marc's
litigation experience spans across various
technologies and industries.
With over 20 years of
experience in
litigation support and document - related
technologies, Paul Allieri has spent a large portion of his career assisting and supporting major law firms and corporate law departments.
In a very topical application of data analytics, US employment leader Littler has announced the launch of the Littler Pay Equity Assessment, which combines the 1300 + lawyer firm's
experience in employment law and compensation with proprietary
technology to identify pay gaps and, ergo, risks of
litigation.
Using our wide - ranging
litigation experience and business savvy, Carr Maloney represents clients in sophisticated copyright, trademark, licensing, e-commerce, unfair competition, Internet and
technology law matters.
Hal Brooks is an eDiscovery and
Litigation Technology professional with more than 25 years»
experience.
«We leveraged our intellectual property and
litigation experience, and embraced
technology and electronic project management.
Brian Ingram is a
litigation technology and eDiscovery professional with over 20 years»
experience in the legal profession.
A good number were individuals with years of
litigation support
experience, who picked up a lot of
technology and law over the years, were detail oriented yet personable, but had no formal training in any «related» field.
He has extensive
experience in all aspects of intellectual property practice, including IP
litigation, patent procurement,
technology transfer and licensing, and due diligence for corporate transactions.
His patent
litigation experience also extends to a wide range of other
technologies, including consumer electronics, specialty chemicals, automotive parts, financial services, medical devices, as well as software and web services.
«Jamie's
experience in the
litigation services arena is unparalleled, helping organizations to both develop their overall discovery strategy and address their day - to - day discovery and
litigation challenges through the effective balance of people, processes and
technology,» Rowe said.
He has significant
experience in oil and gas, bankruptcy and insolvency
litigation, energy, insurance coverage,
technology and intellectual property disputes.
With more than 20 years of
experience practicing in the area of intellectual property
litigation, Angileri has lead council for a wide variety of clients that spreads across various
technologies and industries including, automotive, consumer electronics, industrial
technologies, food and beverage and home appliances.
Our lawyers have extensive
experience in
technology, banking and finance, consumer protection, employment, international law, intellectual property, health care, and
litigation.
His practice areas and
experience cover commercial intellectual property advice, IP
litigation, advertising law and
litigation, advice on drafting and / or negotiation of information
technology agreements on seller or buyer side, and advice on the protection and enforcement of trade mark, patent, copyright and industrial designs.
Our IP and IT
Litigation Group is composed of lawyers with a wide range of
experience in the constantly evolving fields of information
technology, e-commerce, and intellectual property.
In my
experience, many
litigation attorneys are slow to adopt new
technology.
Our
litigation lawyers are able to offer clients the benefit of global
experience and familiarity with local courts and practices, which enables us to present complex
technology issues in a form that any judge or jury can understand.
Stokes Carmichael & Ernst LLP is an Atlanta - based general civil
litigation firm with
experience in business law, creditor rights and collection, employment and labor law, business
litigation, securities arbitration and financial services
litigation, personal injury claim, franchise law and
technology law.
Her
litigation experience has involved a wide range of
technologies, from battery spill - containment devices to online computer software.
Through our use of web - based tools and other
technologies, CSI meets the needs of clients in
litigations of all sizes, while leaning on our extensive and invaluable
experience to provide a superior and focused level of service.
Mr. Chen is
experienced in patent
litigation, patent office trials, client counseling, infringement and validity analysis, and patent prosecution in a range of
technologies, including telecommunications, networking, electronic circuitry, semiconductor devices, software, and medical devices.
In addition to intellectual property
litigation, Rob has extensive
experience managing patent portfolios of large and small
technology companies.
Additional industry areas of his patent
litigation experience include automotive mirror products, bar code and machine vision
technology and arcade games.