Sentences with phrase «litigatorspublications about jurors»
Learn more about the juror here.
https://newamericanpaintings.wordpress.com/
About the juror: Sha Towers is an Art Liaison Librarian and Director of Liaison Services at Baylor University in Waco, Texas.
About the juror: Charles L. Moffett joined Sotheby's in 2013 after spending two years working for an art advisory group with offices in Los Angeles and New York.
ABOUT THE JUROR: Lauren Childs began studying classical figure drawing by the age of twelve.
About the Juror: Curator at The Heckscher Museum of Art in Huntington, New York, Lisa Chalif has organized dozens of exhibitions that focus on various aspects of the Museum's permanent collection, as well as loan exhibits on a diverse range of subjects, including experimental photography, environmental art, appropriation, art and the automobile, and occasional solo exhibitions of Long Island artists, including photographer Joseph Szabo.
About the Juror: Larry Walker utilizes painting, drawing, collage and mixed materials as the primary processes for his work.
About the Juror: Curator and writer Marvin Heiferman organizes projects about photography and visual culture for institutions including the Museum of Modern Art, Smithsonian Institution, International Center of Photography, Whitney Museum of American Art, New Museum and the Hillman Photography Initiative at the Carnegie Museum of Art.
Artists: Bailey Crow, Chuck Pratt, Dario S. Bucheli, Erin Zerbe, Glenn Downing, Harin Song, Jake Dockins, James Volkert, JD Moore, Khadijah Rehman, Laurent Diemer, Maedeh Kadkhodazadeh, Megan DeSoto, Ricardo Orozco, Sarah Nguyen, and Stephen Reichert About the Juror: Art Room We are a creative created by artists for artists.
About the Juror: Justine Kurland was born in 1969 in Warsaw, New York.
About the Juror: New York - based artist Mickalene Thomas is best known for her elaborate paintings composed of rhinestones, acrylic and enamel.
About the Juror: Kathryn Markel, owner of Kathryn Markel Fine Arts in New York City, has helped clients find serious contemporary art that is beautiful as well as visually and intellectually engaging since 1976.
ABOUT THE JUROR: Kristen Gaylord is the Beaumont & Nancy Newhall Curatorial Fellow in the Department of Photography at M o MA.
ABOUT THE JUROR: Born in Rome, Sara DeLuca is the owner and director of Ille Arts Gallery, one of the foremost fine arts purveyors in the Hamptons of Long Island, New York.
About the Juror Pat Rogers is an award - winning arts journalist and art writer.
About the Juror: Helen Frederick is an internationally known artist whose work has been exhibited at The Phillips Collection in DC, and the Museum of Modern Art, Kyoto, Japan; and is in the collections of the Whitney and Brooklyn Museums, including the Feminist Art Base, in New York, and the National Gallery of Art in DC.
About the Juror Aaron McIntosh is a fourth generation quiltmaker and cross-disciplinary artist whose work mines the intersections of material culture, family tradition, desire, and identity politics.
About the Juror: We are fortunate to have Rosario Güiraldes jurying the show.
Appearing in court and actually trying medical malpractice cases in Michigan has also taught us a lot about jurors.
During questioning about juror exposure to the literature, only one juror said that he was approached but that he declined to accept the information.
During questioning about juror exposure to the literature, only one potential juror said that he was approached but that he declined to accept the information.
He has said that lawyers can «go way beyond what we're supposed to know about jurors,» and that «It's very painless to do it.
There has been a decent amount written about jurors» use of Twitter in courts, and also about whether journalists should be allowed to report from the courtroom using Twitter.
What of restrictions on lawyers who want to get out - of - court information about jurors, ideally in time to challenge them at the time of their selection, but also to tailor arguments and maybe even appeal results?
So how much can lawyers use social media to learn about jurors, and how far may a juror go in social media posts about their jury service before they corrupt the judicial process?
Most lawyers want to know as much as possible about the jurors on their case.
Often we hear in the FIJA office from or about jurors who initially voted Not Guilty, but changed their vote to Guilty because they couldn't convince the other jurors.
First, it is critical to understand this one fact about jurors: while they do not particularly like or trust expert witnesses, they do like people who can help them understand the material in a case.
There have also been concerns about jurors doing online research, «visiting» a crime scene on Google Earth or following Twitter or blog feeds written by reporters or others during a trial.
As you know, courts in the US have been exercised about jurors and even parties to litigation going online, using Twitter during trials, and so on.
FIJA executive director Kirsten Tynan will speak about the juror's traditional, legal authority to conscientiously acquit through jury nullification and about the impact of various changes to the jury system on its role in protecting individual rights.
They will distribute free FIJA materials as well as answer questions for those who stop by the table to learn about jurors» rights and responsibilities.
In a unanimous decision, the Court held that testimony about juror statements made during deliberation is not admissible to show dishonesty during voir dire.
Most judges find out about juror misuse of Net media from tattling by other jurors or lawyers (perhaps lawyers who feel they are losing the case?).
«In several places, the questions are particularly well designed to get direct information about jurors» specific experiences and conduct, not their (usually less reliable) personal assessment of whether they can be fair.»
Not exact matches
«It's OK to exclude people who can't follow the law and their oaths as jurors, but you can't say that anyone with qualms about capital punishment is ineligible,» Richard Re, an assistant law professor at the University of California at Los Angeles, told Business Insider in an email.
Many jurors actually make up their minds about sentencing before the end of a trial.
During the monthlong trial, jurors watched video from Garcia Zarate's four - hour police interrogation, in which he offered varying statements about his actions on the pier.
Investors told jurors they were dazzled by Amanat's claims of Hollywood ties and that he had «bragged about partying with. . .
«And you have to think about whether you really want jurors who don't have knowledge or opinions.
One of his fellow jurors happened to be Randall Smith, an associate director at P&G, so he turned to him and asked him about the spot's brief and origins.
Sunday's verdicts followed a three - month trial, in which jurors heard wiretaps of Shafia referring to his daughters as «whores» and ranting about their behavior.
And by jurors sitting and smoking and drinking coffee for hours on end while they had rather be about their jobs — and then finding their way through legalisms and technicalities to reasonable doubts and moral certainties.
A Christian rape survivor is calling for jurors in sexual assault trials to be given more guidance about what constitutes rape.
If the jurors have a reasonable doubt about this, they must not consider the statement for any purpose, nor any evidence obtained as a result thereof.
A Christian rape survivor is calling for jurors in sexual assault trials to be given more guidance about... More
The story was reported by St. Louis Public Radio, in which Grand Juror Doe's lawsuit says «In [the grand juror]'s view, the current information available about the grand jurors» views is not entirely accurate — especially the implication that all grand jurors believed that there was no support for any charges.&rJuror Doe's lawsuit says «In [the grand juror]'s view, the current information available about the grand jurors» views is not entirely accurate — especially the implication that all grand jurors believed that there was no support for any charges.&rjuror]'s view, the current information available about the grand jurors» views is not entirely accurate — especially the implication that all grand jurors believed that there was no support for any charges.»
All jurors have stated, «this case was not about race.
The jurors listened as lawyers argued that the trial was about the rights of midwives and parents to choose home birth, and they were aware of the daily presence of midwife advocates who filled the courtroom in support of Cryns.
Confused about the judge's intentions, prosecutors and Cryns» lawyers argued for bringing the jurors back to the Waukegan courtroom the following day.
If jurors find a defendant guilty of murder, they can take testimony about postpartum issues into consideration during the trial's punishment phase.