Sentences with phrase «little changed in game»

Not exact matches

The biggest thing is we're in here everyday making this game, making a little change here, a tweak there.

Burnie Burns, cofounder of Austin - based Rooster Teeth, a production company with 300 - plus staffers that produced the made - for - YouTube sci - fi comedy Lazer Team and its upcoming sequel, still remembers being dumbstruck almost a decade ago, when Rooster Teeth consisted of little more than a handful of friends, by what the service offered: «They completely changed the game in terms of the ability to monetize video with pre-roll advertising.

I'm talking about a game - changing event that could, with little warning, propel the price of gold upward by hundreds — even thousands — of dollars per ounce in the space of a few weeks... conceivably overnight!

Even though Google has changed the game a little in terms of returning the most relevant page for your site, this is still the standard way of measuring the success of a campaign.

Love Little Bit Country — dropped the jalepenos — maple syrup in cocktails changed the game for me!

Of course it would be silly to suggest that winning any game, cup or otherwise, isn't good for the club, but let's remember just how problematic FA Cup success has been for this club... I'm certainly not going to suggest I didn't enjoy seeing Arsenal win, I'm a fan of this club first and foremost, but how bad are things when you find yourself secretly wishing that your own team lost so that just maybe real change would finally come... I resent this team for even making me feel such thoughts and it's going to take a lot of effort on their part to earn my trust again... this club has treated the fans so poorly that it has created an incredibly fragile and toxic environment, so much so that a «what have you done for me lately» mentality has emerged... fans rise and fall depending on the results of each game because we don't have faith in those in charge to make the necessary changes to personnel and tactics... each time we win many fans attack any dissenting voices and make unrealistic claims about the players, the manager and the potential for unprecedented success... every time we lose the boo - birds run rampant, calling for heads to roll and predicting the worst... regardless of what side you fall on, it's not your fault, both sides are simply overcompensating for the horrible state of affairs that have been percolating for several years... it's hard to take the long view when those in charge have lied incessantly and refuse to take any responsibilities for their own actions... in the end, we are trapped by the same catch - 22 that ManU faced upon Fergie's exit... less fearful of maintaining the status quo than facing the unknown, which was validated, wrongly or rightly, by witnessing the difficulties they have faced during this transitory period... to be honest, the thing that scares me most is that this team has never prepared whatsoever for this eventuality, which considering our frugal nature and the way we have shunned many of our most revered former players is more than a little disconcerting

Both teams have had a poor start to the campaign, Chelsea worse so than us but if it is the opinion of the author that simply because we are 3 points ahead of the champions after 4 games in that «there is little reason to think it will change any time soon» then I think he is misguided.

I'd start him for a while to let him get some games in then when he starts to lose his way a little put him on the bench to try and change things later on.

Defenders will have little time to adjust properly for Girouds game whenever brought on late, the change in play might easily lead to mistakes.

Considering the importance of Arsenal keeping up our winning run in the FA Cup, I was a little surprised that Arsene Wenger made a whole nine changes to the team that played Chelsea last week, but it looks like Le Prof gambled with just the right amount of rotation and we ended up winning the game without too many dramas.

Maybe he was just having a little dig at hs own players that were lacking in the team spirit department, but that doesn't change the fact that this weeken's result was only the third time Chelsea had drawn this season, and have won every single other game.

Welbeck needs to be give a decent run in the team as a striker before fans can start judging remember he played out on the left for a majority of games for man u and got very little chance to play as a striker hence thats why his goal scoring record looks nothing special but that can change with us he has good pace technically very good and i personally think he will do a good job just give him a chance!

The likes of koscielny, coquelin, monreal and ospina have also made a difference, but also wenger has made changes to the attacking side of the game, players like podolski and sanogo have been moved out as they simply offer little to the team in way of work rate when we don't have the ball.

but I agree in challenging a refs decision during a game it won't change anything they made a decision and it's final but all in all refs need to show a little respect to footballers, managers as well they aren't children they're grown men this is football not secondary school.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Dortmund and Arsenal are the two favourites to progress from this group, but a win in Germany will make us hot favourites to finish top of the group for a change, and Reus» absence will be a little boost ahead of the game.

... but that is not to say he will not leave a permanent impression on the English, even world game, he will — little doubt, it is just a real shame that he refused to change his ways, refused to adapt and has been left in a position where a majority of the club's fans wanted him out.

The visitors, it seemed, would have to change their game - plan and perhaps be a little more expansive, but the reigning Premier League champions offered little in the way of a response.

We came out in the second half, had a glorious chance to make it 3 - 0, didn't take it and almost straight away they went up the other end and scored for 2 - 1 and the momentum of the game changed a little bit.

To give some idea of the changes that had taken place since Fergie's arrival, the thirteen United players involved here included only two (Robson and Strachan) who'd played in the manager's first United - Liverpool game only a little more than two years ago.

Out of desperation the tactical set - up was changed, we beat a few teams who had little to play for, rode our luck in two games against City, and a fortunate first goal against Chelsea in the Cup Final -(Sanchez brought the ball down with his hands that led to the goal)-- and just as in 2014, the manager used his go - to Cup to justify a new contract.

It showed that despite Lazio's great form in the first few months of the season, they still lacked that little spark to change the game.

I haven't said he's our ray of hope, he's a good little player who does have it in him to produce a bit of brilliance that can change a game — the assist for the Henry goal that got us 3 points against Sunderland for instance.

It made little change on the game, as Arsenal continued to dominate and saw Mohamed Elneny score a lovely curling goal in the 74th.

Little League baseball is one example — they've actually changed the game by putting in rules to protect the players» health — so inroads have been made.

I am a huge fan of the original Prince of Persia trilogy, and when I heard about this game I was a little worried that they would change to much of what made the original games great, and I was right, the gameplay has been completely destroyed, platforming is awkward do to too may actions being mapped to the same buttons, combat is tedious and unenjoyable, it's EXTREMELY repetitive, having to search around for light seeds just to advance the plot is stupid, and do to the fact that you can't really die the whole game just feels like trial and error, and the new Prince character is completely unlikeable, while they messed up most of the game it's got some good things going for it, the voice acting is solid, the graphics are beautiful, and the ending does have interested in seeing where the story goes from here, but I'm not sure if I want to pick up the next game they come out with, this was a huge disappointment and isn't worthy to bear the Prince of Persia name.

It's bloated, cumbersome and little has changed from last year, and in that way bears many parallels to the game itself.

Other than an increase in the difficulty level of the picross puzzles, very little has changed compared to the previous games.

Going into Front Mission Evolved I wasn't sure what to expect.I normally am not the biggest fan of mech games, however, Square Enix and Double Helix Games have done a great job with this title.Long time fans of the series, or of this genre in general, might not like some of the changes that were made in the latest title, however, Square Enix has made it a lot more accessible.The game is much more like a third person action game as opposed to the tactical type of game play that the series is generally known for.There were definitely times when it felt a little like Lost Planet with the difference being this game actually worked pretty well and was fun.

In some ways this lack of change is a little unfortunate, as elements that felt cumbersome in the older games, such as the narrow corridors that made the rest of your party essentially useless, don't appear to have been altered, despite their flawIn some ways this lack of change is a little unfortunate, as elements that felt cumbersome in the older games, such as the narrow corridors that made the rest of your party essentially useless, don't appear to have been altered, despite their flawin the older games, such as the narrow corridors that made the rest of your party essentially useless, don't appear to have been altered, despite their flaws.

The big difference between Sleep Attack TD and other tower defence games is that you can rotate the battlefield to work in your favour, and this one change makes for a refreshing gameplay experience in a genre that's now a little old in the tooth.

I just want to mention that casting masterstroke up - front because, even though he only gets about two minutes of screen time (and most of it is in the background) it's one of those little touches that shows the people who made «Game Change» have an eye for the telling detail.

Moreover, there's a lot of water in the map along with plenty of little islands; Red Dead Redemption didn't allow players to swim, but this might change in this new game, perhaps even featuring boats.

See, there are a fairly decent amount of bad guys within the game, however no matter what shape of enemy spawns in, the threat, behaviour or difficulty never seem to change, meaning the only difference comes down to the appearance of each of the little pests that come your way.

And leaders of the high - profile charter networks take unabashed delight in how their schools beat the testing pants off district schools — so they have little incentive to change the rules of this game.

If you find yourself in a rut, don't give up, just take a breather and change track - there really is an awful lot of trial and error involved in this game and the sky isn't going fall if you don't get it right the first time, Chicken Little.

Little does he know that the fans in the west are entitled children and swore the game off because of the changes.

It wasn't the packed in Little Deviants that changed my mind in the way that I played, yet games like Wipeout 2048 and even more so when I got my hands on Uncharted: Golden Abyss.

Its definitely not as big a success as Activision wanted and sales are only gonna slow down to cause of all the mixed reviews and the fact there is so little content, so unless there is some serious changes in the sequel, the two DLC packs or Updates I doubt it will survive that ten year plan Activision signed on for... I really enjoyed the game but it does grow repetitive and boring especially without friends, its been resorted to just coming on once a week to do the raid, weekly heroic and nightfall... its doomed to fail without fresh content.

To be entirely fair to Team 17, however, it's still nice to actually have the option of different classes in the game, and while they're not implemented as well as I would have liked and don't change the core gameplay as much as they should, they do at least bring a little more customisation to the game.

Will Titanbot being a great game change Micro $ $ $ oft in any way, meaning will they start to pretend just a little that they care at all about their fan base?

In regards to this Mass Effect 3 is somewhat conflicted, disappointing me in some respects and impressing me in others., Throughout the series we've been given countless chances to alter the story in small ways, and during the build - up to Mass Effect 3's launch fans have been building the hype, believing that every single little choice made during the past two games would return to either haunt you or help you, each one having a huge impact on your game, changing the way everything plays out in massive wayIn regards to this Mass Effect 3 is somewhat conflicted, disappointing me in some respects and impressing me in others., Throughout the series we've been given countless chances to alter the story in small ways, and during the build - up to Mass Effect 3's launch fans have been building the hype, believing that every single little choice made during the past two games would return to either haunt you or help you, each one having a huge impact on your game, changing the way everything plays out in massive wayin some respects and impressing me in others., Throughout the series we've been given countless chances to alter the story in small ways, and during the build - up to Mass Effect 3's launch fans have been building the hype, believing that every single little choice made during the past two games would return to either haunt you or help you, each one having a huge impact on your game, changing the way everything plays out in massive wayin others., Throughout the series we've been given countless chances to alter the story in small ways, and during the build - up to Mass Effect 3's launch fans have been building the hype, believing that every single little choice made during the past two games would return to either haunt you or help you, each one having a huge impact on your game, changing the way everything plays out in massive wayin small ways, and during the build - up to Mass Effect 3's launch fans have been building the hype, believing that every single little choice made during the past two games would return to either haunt you or help you, each one having a huge impact on your game, changing the way everything plays out in massive wayin massive ways.

As much as people blast Call of Duty for being released every year with very little change, the Lego games have far surpassed them in that department, new entries being trotted out at a furious rate.

Online play has changed little since last years entry, boasting the exact same three game modes: Sprint is a simple three lap race in the dry, removing the strategy of fuel and tire management in favor of outright speed; endurance ramps up the lap count to 25 % of total race distance and enables dynamic weather for more potentially interesting races, while Grand Prix lets you customise everything in the same way that the singleplayer version does.

Hopefully they will consider a name change in the game, that or I'll just have grow up a little bit before Tornado touches down this fall.

At this juncture in time it seems almost redundant to criticise the Lego games for failing to innovate or change very much in the formula, and yet it does remain a true and valid criticism, so here we go; LEGO The Hobbit plays it safe, refining a couple of areas and adding a few new little mechanics, while infuriatingly still failing to fix problems that have plagued the series for years.

What's especially interesting here is that, unlike most games in which character variations amount to little more than differing levels of health, armour or attack power, in Nuclear Throne the numerous character abilities fundamentally change the way you play.

The change was snuck out in a little update to the game's page on the PlayStation website, with a Sony representative then confirming to US Gamer that «Days Gone will now be releasing in 2019 and we will keep you updated on the launch date.»

[«Play Evolution» is a bi-weekly column by James Lantz that discusses the changes that games undergo after their release, from little developer patches to huge gameplay revelations, and everything in between.

The bad part of having to buy your weapons, clothing, and etc..., you have to go back to your base which is in another city from all the missions so it gets a little tedious having to go back and forth to make changes to your equipment; fortunately, there are fast travel stations throughout the game.