Sentences with phrase «low pe»

For instance, low PE in preschool - aged children predicted higher levels of depressotypic cognitive styles at age 7 and depressive symptoms at age 10.71,72
Also the biggest mistakes investors make is by reading Grahams early works then trying to invest that way even though those types of stocks and the saftey that went with them no longer exist... So they just buy falling stocks or some really really low pe stocks in cyclic industries or other things and it has been very painful for many.
How to find low PE stocks?
Low PE ratio companies and solid earnings with dividends.
Combining a very low PE with NCAV also works extremely well when investing in net net stocks.
Graham details a simple, mechanical way of generating strong investment returns by purchasing a group of unleveraged stocks with low PE's and selling them based on a mechanical sales rule.
For instance, screening for stocks with high dividends and low PE ratios will yield a portfolio that may have much higher tax liabilities (because of the dividends).
DSR MEMBER ONLY is still very interesting with a relatively low PE ratio (considering the market) and a dividend yield over 3 %.
The following list is comprised of Dividend Champion companies that are trading at historically low PE ratios based almost exclusively on negative investor sentiment.
The stock has surged by over 45 % in 2013 and still trades at a low PE ratio.
Holding a low PE stock is less risky because «it's hard to fall out of a ditch».
PB - ROE analyses are richer than low PE, though in a few environments, like the present, they are similar.»
He accurately observed that cyclical stocks trade at low PE's at times of economic tops and high PE's when the market is low.
If a stock has a low PE and a low book value, it is referred to as a value stock.
For example, low PE is preferable, but what is low, it depends on the industry.
You write «you can create passive investing vehicles (index funds of just low PE stocks or PBV stocks) that will deliver those excess returns at minimal costs.»
PE ratios have nothing to do with value investing, a value investing strategy could mean buying or selling stocks with high and / or low PE ratios.
A high PE Ratio may indicate an overvalued company, and a low PE Ratio may indicate a company that is trading below fair value.
Which screeners are people currently using (which make for a quick / easy analysis of Graham - friendly stocks (low PE / PB and debt levels)?
After all, the market has practically gone straight up since the generational bottom in March 2009, so investors might be drawn in and associate a low PE with continued strong performance.
At the same time, lots of stocks that trade on low PE's, low price to book values and high dividend yields have turned out to be terrible investments.
By using the ModernGraham Valuation Model, I've selected 10 low PE stocks for the Enterprising Investor.
As a result, Income Value portfolios typically exhibit above average current income and low PE ratios.
What I liked about NE was the low PE and high yield.
I have been adding to my AFL for a few months already but what I found interesting from this article is the high yield that many of these low PE stocks offer.
I don't think it's a surprise that energy and financial stocks popped up on the high yield low PE screen.
Our next high yield low PE stock is Sibanye Gold Limited (SBGL).
BP and TOT are other low PE, high yield foreign plays to consider.
But the 4 % of so decline since then has lowered the PE only slightly, from 31 to 30.
Figure 14 shows the performance of a strategy that went long stocks with high PEs and short stocks with low PEs.
If accounting earnings actually drove valuations, then companies with high EPS growth should command higher multiples, and companies with low or negative EPS growth should have lower PE multiples.
Assuming ahealthy business, the lower the PE the more secure the principal and the more bond - like the stock» Andrew Redleaf
The spread between the countries with the highest and lowest PE ratios dropped by more than half during the period.
It is a financial ratio used for valuation: a higher PE ratio means that investors are paying more for each unit of net income, so the stock is more expensive compared to one with lower PE ratio.
But how would the 15 year comparision with dividends for high PE asian paints, nestle, ITC compare with lower PE higher dividend paying like Tata Investment, VST Industries, Castrol, Pirmal, GIC Housing.
Do you love sifting through the 52 - week low, lowest PE or highest dividend yield list?
Is it because the higher ROE is achieved via leverage, is therefore riskier, and requires a lower PE?
The lower the PE 10 the more undervalued the market is historically.
As a thumb rule, a company with lower PE ratio is considered under - valued compared to another company in the same sector with higher PE ratio.
The most stable, dividend paying sectors have the highest PEs, the most cyclical elements tand to have the lowest PEs now.
The problem with the Chinese banks is that they are optically cheap, i.e. they trade on high dividend yields and low PEs.
I just set a lower PE threshold - Bryan
The office sector had the lowest PES, while the industrial sector had the highest.
Generally speaking, this trend suggests that markets with a higher level of supply constraints (a low PES) have had higher returns in price appreciation over the same time period.

Not exact matches

Private equity funds are basically «corporates on steroids» because they can't simply compete and perform the same way any other corporate would because corporates have a lower cost of capital and are able to accept lower returns than a PE firm.
One popular rule of thumb is that when the forward PE is above average, the market is expensive and future returns will be low.
Partly because of its European address, this business has a PE ratio of about 12.7 times, which is much lower than the 18 times Telus is trading at or Rogers» near 15 times earnings.
The Shiller PE has been in the low 20s in recent months.
I'm actively looking at my debt and determining if it makes more sense to pay down mortgages (locking in a guaranteed ~ 4 % return) or investing in bonds (~ 1 % returns if held to maturity) or stocks (uncertain, but I just wrote an article about the current PE ratio and the inevitable reversion to the mean and I believe we are likely headed for 10 years of low single digit returns).
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z