Sort of
a lukewarmer view not simply argued in a blog comment.
Like most
Lukewarmers my view of the physics tells me the pause will end.
Not exact matches
(Although I imagine being a «
lukewarmer» is probably worse, from your point of
view.)
As I have read during the past 6 + years, I have moved well toward the «
lukewarmer»
view.
More clear framing — e.g. «as a
lukewarmer, I have what I believe is a nuanced
view on the strength of the findings of mainstream climate science regarding anthropogenic greenhouse - driven warming and associated claims of climate change.
Most
lukewarmers (including myself) will tell you that our reading of the data brought us to our position regardless of where it lies on the spectrum of
views on the issue.
Lukewarmers have much more mainstream
views than the easy stereotype of the denier.
Now it's from Ross Douthat, who declares for lukewarmerism: LIKE a lot of conservatives who write about public policy, my
views on climate change place me in the ranks of what the British writer Matt Ridley once dubbed the «
lukewarmers.»
The
View From Here The
Lukewarmer's Way Bad Science Debunked Climate Scepticism (dying site?)
Readers will know that as a
lukewarmer, I have as little patience with outright CO2 warming deniers as I do with those declaring a catastrophe (for my
views read this and this).