Sentences with phrase «luking so»

Not exact matches

I am a school teacher trying to memorize luke 6:39 - 42 with my third grade students, yes so far we've enjoyed the humor in the text, but now I realize there's much more to it... and It's my prayer that the Holy Spirit will help us to digest all of it!

I don't think it's so much about the levites being paid for their service it's about us doing what's right toward Pastors that must feed and tend to the flock of GOD if GOD has called them.JESUS even said in luke 10:7 that the laborers are worthy of their wages.In luke 8 1 - 4 it's says even JESUS HIMSELF recieved financial support from the women who ministered to him with their possessions.Now most people today would say he should have been ashamed of taking money from those poor women but JESUS accepted their support and they was blessed for sowing onto the LORD»S work.1 Corinthains 9:1 - 15 says dint muzzle the ox while it tread out the grain was GOD talking about oxes no he was talking about those who labor in the ministry.Who goes to war at their own expense.Or who goes to war but pay for their clothes, guns, etc.No one because the goverment if that country provide these things because of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLESS.

I now can slightly, better understand why luke gatti would want this bacon jalapeno mac n cheese so bad.

luke's collar pop, finn trying to me the man and the next moment trying to sneak out, the bizarre three - way potential love with finn rey and new girl, snoke going out so easy, bombers in space moving slowly and having to «drop» them in zero gravity while an x wing takes out the biggest ship in the galaxy lol!

from a technical standpoint some of them were so bad, even luke thomas was saying some of those arm bar finishes were just pure bad bad defence... one of the girls came into the fight as if she was dressed to go clubbing... lool

To think luke shaw cost so much I would say bellerin is twice the player he is..

So we got him a sippy of luke - warm water and he fell asleep just about instantaneously.

Usually, quite a few home cooks soak the crisp boondi in luke warm water so that it softens before being added to the beaten yogurt.

That's awesome that luke is doing so well!

Kenneth Branagh's last directorial effort JACK RYAN: SHADOW RECRUIT got a luke - warm reception earlier on this year so he's possibly hoping for greater things...

What is not so sporty is the powertrain and chassis, which relegate the i30 SR to luke - warm hatch at best.

It is clear that he, and all the other luke - warmers should no longer be considered serious scientists - their opinions count for nothing except to be placed on the scales when justice is served to those who have helped delay climate change action for so long.

So I suppose I was a luke warmer by instinct.

I am a «skeptic» and «luke - warmer» because there is so much so obviously wrong with the «consensus» science.

So if I sticking my hand in a pot of luke warm water won't hurt, and sticking my hand in a pot of warm water won't hurt, sticking my hand in a pot of boiling water won't hurt either.

That's as far as I'm going with this, the next 1 or 2 years will be make or break for all theories — AGW, solar / ocean cycles, luke - warm, everyone, so there's no point going round and round on an argument that the actual observed climate will resolve one way or the other very soon.

However the question is specifically chosen to make (luke --RRB- warmers (and the question was directed at Mindert) think inductively about the so - called Greenhouse Effect.

So if this result is new then it is good news to the luke - warming project of science communication.

In the comment section there was a comment that, in my opinion, mis - characterized the position of the luke - warmers I know so I responded.

luke, I forget your purpose here is to make mischief; you want me to say that Neutrino is right and Nasif is wrong; Neutrino has laid out how he thinks SB should be applied, in terms of emission not absorption, Nasif wants his formula for absorptivity explained by Neutrino; I don't understand the formula and have said so; do you understand it?