Not exact matches
I guess I feel the same way about a liberal agenda that say that to get out of
debt we have to spend more, or that my tax dollars have to pay for something I think is morally wrong (Obamacare sets up a fund to pay for late term abortions) or a government that confiscates kids
lunches, or tells me how much soda I can drink, or uses my tax money to choose winners and losers (mostly losers but Obma doners)
in energy production that produces no energy yet we are sitting on more coal and oil than any other nation on the planet.
In St. Paul, unlike other school districts, the
debt students who can't afford to pay for their
lunch accrues is the responsibility of the district, not the students.
In early April, I had a news story in the New York Times about the passage of a groundbreaking law in New Mexico that bans «lunch shaming» - practices in the cafeteria that single out kids with meal debt, such as being given a cold sandwich instead... [Continue readin
In early April, I had a news story
in the New York Times about the passage of a groundbreaking law in New Mexico that bans «lunch shaming» - practices in the cafeteria that single out kids with meal debt, such as being given a cold sandwich instead... [Continue readin
in the New York Times about the passage of a groundbreaking law
in New Mexico that bans «lunch shaming» - practices in the cafeteria that single out kids with meal debt, such as being given a cold sandwich instead... [Continue readin
in New Mexico that bans «
lunch shaming» - practices
in the cafeteria that single out kids with meal debt, such as being given a cold sandwich instead... [Continue readin
in the cafeteria that single out kids with meal
debt, such as being given a cold sandwich instead... [Continue reading]
In the last two weeks, both this blog and the national media have featured a rash of stories about children having their
lunches taken away by cafeteria employees due to unpaid
lunch balances, and I also told you about a generous Houston school tutor / mentor who recently paid $ 465 of his own money to clear the
debt of over 60 students.
As I reported
in two stories
in the New York Times this spring,
lunch shaming is the practice of singling out children
in the cafeteria over school meal
debt by offering them alternate cold meals such as a cheese sandwich, marking them with a wrist band or hand stamp, or,
in rare cases, requiring them to do chores
in exchange for a meal.
For those unfamiliar with the term, «
lunch shaming» refers to practices
in the cafeteria that single out children with school meal
debt, such as making the child wear a special wrist band, stamping the child's arm or hand, throwing the child's meal away
in front of peers, or even making a child do chores, like wiping down tables,
in exchange for a meal.
Yesterday, many media outlets reported on a bill introduced
in Congress which, if enacted, would allegedly ban «
lunch shaming,» i.e., practices
in the cafeteria that single out children with meal
debt.
While impoverished families and those inside the school food world have known about
lunch shaming for decades, the intense viral reaction to those two Times stories made clear that most Americans had no idea that kids with meal
debt are stigmatized every day
in school cafeterias around the country.
And this year, because of all the interest
in «
lunch shaming,» I wanted to mention a particular charity that helps out kids with school meal debt — School Lunch F
lunch shaming,» I wanted to mention a particular charity that helps out kids with school meal
debt — School
Lunch F
Lunch Fairy.
Cheese sandwiches and other «alternate meals» have been added to menus
in school districts across the country as they try to deal with
lunch debts.
Huge data sets were shared with IDEO staff for their project, but even members of the SF Board of Education have no access to files showing how many students at each school have not yet returned a meal application, or how many ate school
lunch in October, or how much cafeteria
debt each school is accumulating.
This results
in the realization that as soon as external conditions turn unfavorable — i.e. when the free
lunch of automatic growth and undiscovered deception is over — the likelyhood of almost any level of
debt to be repaid is low.
[S] ome GOP lawmakers were exploring whether the political stalemate over funding the government could best be resolved by crafting a broader fiscal package that would include an increase
in the
debt ceiling... The speaker expressed optimism at the
lunch that he might be able to combine the two issues to embark on broader budget negotiations with the White House and Senate Democrats.»
Nearly one
in five (19 per cent) said they had been
in arrears or
debt to their child's school for payments for things such as
lunches or activities, with over a third (36 per cent) saying that the situation was not dealt with sensitively by the school.
In this edition of the Harvard EdCast, Ford discusses her personal experience with school
lunch debt and how her one tweet inspired a movement.
Yet, now, over $ 150,000 has been donated nationwide by hundreds of people
in order to wipe out the
lunch debt of strangers.
Prohibiting
lunch shaming
in PA law ensures that school employees will end this extraordinarily cruel practice of humiliating students because they have unpaid
lunch debts.
Student enrichment: The Wellington Rotary Club donates $ 20,000 to cover the
lunch debts of 10,000 students
in the Palm Beach County School District.
In a survey by the association, districts reported median
lunch debt of a few thousand dollars — but some were far higher, as much as $ 4.7 million.
You might be surprised that small changes
in your daily habits (like packing your
lunch) can save loads of money for
debt repayment.
Mitchell details the
debt he went into using those services, and the sacrifices he had to make to climb out (cancelling cable, trading
in his cell phone for a prepaid plan, working a temporary night job, eating $ 1 frozen meals for
lunch and dinner, etc...).
Hopefully you'll learn a bit more than the usual «take your
lunch to work with you» or «pay off your
debt first» advice churned out
in other articles.