Not exact matches
Furthermore, when ruling
on the second condition of Article 8 Regulation 45/2001 whereby EU institutions have a duty to verify that
data subjects» legitimate interests may not be harmed by the transfer, the Court found that the personal
data at issue fell into the public sphere of
MEPs and as such required a lesser degree of
protection.
Recently, journalists from all EU member states raised, for the first time ever, a joint voice before the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) against the refusal of the European Parliament (EP) to give access,
on grounds of personal
data protection, to information
on how
MEPs spend their allowances.
Indeed, despite being EU members, Britain has been the subject of criticism within the EU for being seen as a «soft touch»
on data protection, particularly following Edward Snowden's revelations
on how the UK government allowed its intelligence agency, GCHQ, to monitor private communications («
MEPs tighten up draft
data privacy rules after Snowden revelations», http://www.theguardian.com 22 October 2013).