Not exact matches
The choice to process mere listings,
on behalf of the
sellers, rests solely in the hands
of the REALTORS (r) who elect to participate in the TREB
MLS process, using it for that purpose; that's what SOME REALTORS (r) wanted and that's what they voted for, and that's what they got (and as a result WE ALL GOT).
«Placing a property for sale» in to the
MLS system (for a fee)
on behalf of a
seller who wants to sell privately, «reliving the REALTOR (r)
of any further obligations» — called what?
If the BB refuses to accept our Co-Op we will still process the transaction
on behalf of our
seller, we just defer to the stated
MLS commission and terms being offered.
The article goes
on to say: «One (CREA) rule requires listing agents to receive offers from potential buyers and negotiate
on behalf of the
seller in order to list the property within the
MLS».
This type
of error can create issues between the brokerage and the client, in this case a
seller, as the brokerage did not have written authority to represent the
seller on June 3rd and 4th and may have completed work
on their
behalf (i.e. listed property
on MLS ®, erected a sign
on the lawn, etc.).
Now they have blown it to bits by allowing our coveted
MLS system to be infiltrated with unlicensed individuals and companies who are holding themselves out to be working
on behalf of the
Sellers and Buyers.