Under the first past the post electoral system, many Labour votes were «wasted» as part of large majorities for
MPs in safe seats rather than into holding onto marginal seats.
After all, I can't remember anyone at the height of the expenses scandal saying «If only we had AV...» Proponents of AV also claim that a new system would get supposedly lazy
MPs in safe seats to work harder.
Not exact matches
It is also not surprising that many current
MPs are opposed to electoral reform, given that they are the ones with most to lose from it, particularly those
in safe seats.
Besides the fact that AV doesn't do much to stop this (
in the
safest seats,
MPs tend to get big percentages of the vote anyway), it's another continuation of the idea that we can get reforms passed on the back of public anger towards
MPs over the expenses scandal.
Is there any pattern
in which party leaders
in UK parliaments are typically from
safer seats than average
MPs?
In short, the new generation of Tory
MPs, if tugged one way by their constituents and the other by the Whips, will go with the former (especially since no
seat, now, is ever completely «
safe», and local Associations are no longer reflexively loyalist).
The Tories may do well
in the south of England, where they're fighting marginal
seats against the Liberal Democrats — fleeing Lib Dem voters will go to Labour, which should translate into
safer Tory
seats — but it's
in the north of England and the East Midlands where there are many Conservative
MPs hanging onto their
seats against Labour challengers.
Many Labour
MPs, especially
in northern
safer seats, oppose the reform.
Selections
in the
safe seats 51 candidates have been selected for the
seats where Conservative
MPs are standing down, or where boundary changes have created new Conservative
seats or converted existing ones into Conservative
seats.
AV will end the scandal of
safe seats for life; it will make candidates for elections work harder; it is a change supported by Benjamin Zephaniah (
in urban areas) and Tony Robinson (
in rural areas); it will end the expenses scandal; it will help minor parties to flourish; it is, by definition, fair, not least because it will lead to
MPs who are supported by at least 50 % of their electorate.
The latest tranche of constituencies seeking a candidate was released yesterday and includes three
safe seats where sitting
MPs have announced their retirements
in recent days.
The Winterton's «only following the rules, guv» approach is typical of the arrogance of privilege that seems all too common among
MPs that sit
in safe seats they have held for decades.
The «
safe seat» mentality must at least be an aspect of the accusation that
MPs became careless
in their expenses claims and dismissive of their electorate.
None of these are «the answer» to the great disconnect, but while Westminster fails to do all it can, we know its
MPs sit too complacently
in their
safe seats.
It suits too many of the 580
MPs in rock - solid
safe seats not to bother much about the mass of non-voting young people and low earners.
The blood of some Tory
MPs is up, especially
in safer seats.
Sure, there have been outriders floating radical ideas about policy and party reform, yet despite the fears among
MPs that there would be a period of blood - letting following Owen Smith's emphatic defeat
in the second leadership election last summer, there has been no abuse of the party's internal processes by Corbyn, evidenced by the failure of his supporters to secure berths
in the pre-election carve - up of
safe seats.
Dalek, switching to a
seat just because it is
safer, without regard to the constituents you currently represent, is unprincipled, opportunistic and selfish - that is why Hywel Williams has not done that, as like all three Plaid Cymru
MPs (and unlike many Labour
MPs in Wales and elsewhere) he actually cares about the people he represents
in Westminster.
Politics: Generally a very
safe Labour
seat,
in various guises Salford has consistently returned Labour
MPs since 1945, although Hazel Blears «majority fell sharply
in 2010 after she became embroiled
in the expenses scandal and was targetted by a hostile «Hazel Must Go» campaign.
How many male, white, straight Conservative
MPs currently passionately campaigning for the selection of more women, and more men and women from ethnic minorities, would voluntarily relinquish their own
seats in order to encourage local associations to follow the policy line they preach from their own smug,
safe base?