I remain intrigued by the prospect of Alex Salmond and dozens of
MPs holding the balance of power at Westminster post-election; it will be little more than the main parties deserve after the contemptuous way they treated those inclined to vote yes in the independence referendum.
Not exact matches
If their poll numbers
hold, then they could end up with about 50
MPs — up from 6 — and so
hold the
balance of power in any Parliament.
But DUP
MPs have notoriously poor attendance records and at least one senior Lib Dem MP believes the party could
hold the «
balance of power» for votes on areas
of mutual interest, such as housebuilding.
Although last week's local election results were hardly inspiring for the Liberal Democrats, they did well enough where they have
MPs to suggest that they have the potential to retain enough seats to
hold the
balance of power again after the 2015 election.
The disappointment for Nicola Sturgeon and the SNP,
of course, is that their powerful block
of MPs doesn't
hold the
balance of power at Westminster, as they'd hoped.
[22][23] The SNP, encouraged by its victory in the 2007 Scottish parliament elections, set itself a target
of returning 20
MPs and hoped to find itself
holding a
balance of power.
But many Labour
MPs fear that an elected Lords would challenge the supremacy
of the Commons and they do not see why they should vote for a reform that would allow the Lib Dems to
hold the
balance of power permanently in the Lords.
Under AV or, particularly, PR the Liberal Democrats would gain
MPs and could routinely
hold the
balance of power.