Sentences with phrase «ms fram»

Explore dazzling icebergs, fjords, and incredible wildlife on this 12 - day small ship cruise aboard the MS Fram.

Walk along Ocean Drive and gaze at the Art Deco houses, discover graffiti art and murals in Wynwood and enjoy a slice of key lime pie before embarking on MS Fram in the afternoon.

MS Fram honors the heritage of the original Fram, using the most advanced technology and making her exceptionally well suited for expedition voyages in polar regions.

MS Fram was built in 2007 with one mission in mind — to bring her guests closer to nature, wildlife and unforgettable experiences.

With 127 cabins on MS Fram, you have a choice of comfortable cabins and a number of superior suites to choose from.

Set out on an expedition with MS Fram, our original expedition ship that's smaller in size for even closer encounters in the Arctic seas.

Our suites are named after Norwegian polar heroes, MS Fram travels in the wake of these great explorers.

Experience the thrill of canal transit and the intricacy of the lock's system first - hand, as MS Fram is lifted over 85 feet above sea level from one body of water to the next.

Hurtigruten «s expedition ship MS Fram sails in Antarctica, Spitsbergen, and near Greenland.

In that study, a group of European and North American scholars sought to probe the developmental social psychology of totalitarian oppressiveness and to delineate the personality characteristics of those who would be its framers and implementers.

My babies first Santa picture together will forever be a framer.

I hope that is a framer!

That's a framer!

They can be fram...

If you recent changed which type of filter you use, you may want to go back to that style / brand of filter (unless that filter is a Fram filter — plenty of stuff out there on it, but here is a good example with pictures of exactly what I'm talking about).

That's Fram — simply the best expedition ship imaginable.

It's not that I couldn't share a few ideas on those subjects, because after all, I am framer, and with all proper modesty, a pretty good one.

JUSTICE STEVENS begins his concurring opinion with the startling observation that the Commerce Clause «was the Framers» response to the central problem that gave rise to the Constitution itself.»

Not exact matches

In Brown's very readable law review article, she explains why — and cites another scholar, Puneet K. Sandhu, who sums up a few reasons why it would be challenging to affirm even if the framers had hoped to do so.

Three facets of today's U.S. civic discourse would worry the Framers, said Eisgruber: «mistrust of institutions,» which they considered crucial to forming a republic; the «geographic sorting» that finds people of like - minded views grouping together rather than being more evenly distributed throughout the country; and the rise of technologies (read: Facebook) that are keeping people from reading facts and views that give them proper «civic understanding.»

The framers knew this was a public good,» Klotz says.

Scalia, who died last February, was a leading proponent of originalism, an approach that seeks to resolve constitutional disputes by focusing on the document's text, its historical context and the framers» intentions.

He also cited the founding fathers: «The Framers of our Constitution were all too aware of the hysteria that often results from a crime that shocks the community's conscience.»

The first home being rebuilt in Fountaingrove reached a milestone recently when framers began roughing in the walls of Ed and Kathy Hamilton's Shillingford Place home.

When the constitutional mandate is sufficiently clear from the text, the understanding of the framers, or the structure of constitutional government, it removes certain matters from popular control and majoritarian rule.

The framers and ratifiers intended it to be a permanent text, establishing fundamental and immutable principles for republican government.

The Ninth Amendment, Goldberg emphasized, reflects the Framers» original understanding that «other fundamental personal rights should not be denied protection simply because they are not specifically listed» in the Consti - tution.

My whole point of this issue is that if they deny them their civil rights as Americans, they are unconstitutional... and yes, the framers of the constitution had plenty to say about freedom of religion applying to Muslims.

The framers» idea was that all parts of that core have to be kept in play.

On the contrary, the Constitution extends the highest protection to what the framers believed to be the inalienable right to exercise religion according to the dictates of individual conscience.

The notorious Dred Scott decision (1837) asserted that because slaves were their masters» property Congress could not ban slavery anywhere in the United States — a holding that ignored the Framers» compromise of tolerating slavery temporarily but allowing eventual measures against it.

«My surprise is that the framers of this statement didn't immediately go back and rewrite it because it is so obviously...

It was not for the framers to codify these moral prerequisites.

On the most profound level, however, the framers recognized that ordered liberty depends mightily upon certain habits, virtues and practices — that is, upon a moral culture of a highly developed type.

The purpose of instituting governments, as the American framers noted, was not to enumerate human rights but «to secure these rights.»

Prof. Smolin is troubled (as he should be), but also seems puzzled (as he should not be), about how American jurisprudence departed from the premises of the Framers and Abraham Lincoln.

Though both the conception of human liberty and the virtues necessary to its true exercise sprang from biblical teachings, the framers were careful not to endow biblical religion, or any religion, with state power.

The problem that faced the framers of the Constitution 11 years after the Declaration was how to incarnate that vision in everyday politics.

Thus, the universe being once fram'd by God, and the laws of motion settled, and all upheld by his perpetual concourse, and general providence; the same philosophy teaches, that the phenomena of the world, are physically produced by the mechanical properties of the parts of matter; and, that they operate upon one another according to mechanical laws.

If the framers of the Constitution had been more morally courageous in identifying slavery as an evil, or if the later compensatory amendment had rooted liberty in a common human nature rather than on weaker procedural grounds of equality under the law, then perhaps the expansion of protected classes and arbitrary rights would not have advanced so stridently.

As it happened, the texts reflect a relatively brief period of the dominance of a variation of Enlightenment thought — although, to be sure, those texts must be understood, as the framers certainly did understand them, against the background assumptions of what in fact was a Christian society and culture.

Far from pretending to be constituting a world ex nihilo, the framers appeal to «self - evident truths» such as the assumed fact that all are created equal and «endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.»

I'm for going back to a well regulated Milita like the framers intended.

In a way he wouldn't have expected, the progress of science, as Stephens claimed, is on his and not our Framers» side.

They are more psychological than theological although those of us who are spiritual erotics will tend to fram our beliefs in theological terms.

Bruce A. Ackerman, in Social Justice in the Liberal State (Yale University Press, 1980), arguing for an astringently secular, rational model, is faithful to the framers at least in the proposition that «nobody has the right to vindicate political authority by asserting a privileged insight into the moral universe which is denied to the rest of us.»

Many of the lawgivers of the republic, the framers of the Constitution were large - scale land speculators.

But it is important to add that when the framers of the Constitution envisioned the rough - and - tumble world of public argument, they almost certainly imagined heated disagreements against a background of broadly shared values; certainly that was the model offered by John Locke.

Whatever the Framers had in mind, it was not a method of constitutional interpretation grounded in moral skepticism.

Further, in the framers» understanding, the religion clauses of the First Amendment were primarily jurisdictional, not substantive: They made clear that matters of religion remained within the domain of the states.