Sentences with phrase «machina data»

Lex Machina data indicates that, since January 1, 2016, Shipping & Transit has been named in almost 100 cases.

A new study by MLex uses Lex Machina data to show that more and more district courts are granting attorneys fees requests:

A new study by MLex uses Lex Machina data to show that more and more district courts are granting attorneys fees requests: Nearly six months after the US Supreme Court made it easier to award attorneys» fees in «exceptional» patent cases, US district court judges are increasingly sanctioning parties for filing frivolous lawsuits or engaging in litigation misconduct — except in the most popular place to file a patent suit: the Eastern District of Texas.

This is a 33 percent increase in the 958 patent cases filed during the first quarter but data suggests that the second quarter tends to see the highest level of infringement cases over all other quarters according to Lex Machina data scientists Brian Howard.

While the Lex Machina data is based on existing data from PACER, the federal court system's official electronic filing database, Lex Machina has performed a significant amount of error correction and tagging on top of PACER's docket reports.

Not exact matches

This is a screencap taking during a demo I was given last week by Brian Howard, Lex Machina's legal data scientist.

Two years ago, I wrote a post titled, In Litigation and Legal Research, Judge Analytics is the New Black, in which I discussed three products — Lex Machina, Ravel Law and ALM Judicial Perspectives — that were extracting data from court dockets and applying analytics to reveal insights about judges, such as how they might rule on a specific type of motion or how long they might take to issue a decision.

Lex Machina has developed and refined sophisticated analytics that open new windows into court data.

With today's release, Lex Machina is adding data on 62,000 commercial cases dating back to 2009.

Lex Machina's Patent Litigation Year in Review surveys and summarizes key trends that have emerged over the past year, drawing upon its platform that combines data from PACER, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), International Trade Commission (ITC), U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Orange Book on Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs), among others.

Lex Machina, which started out with a niche focus on intellectual property litigation data and has gradually expanded out into securities and antitrust law, has as part of this latest product development process interviewed commercial litigators from top law firms and major corporations to better understand their particular analytics use - cases.

The November 2015 deal between Lex Machina and legal publishing giant LexisNexis made a lot of sense at the time because the case law analysis system needed tons of legal data to make itself a valuable tool.

The study, based on data from Lex Machina, which also found filings in May 2015 were greater than all but one month in the last 18 or so.

At some point in the future, Lex Machina will also expand into applying its analytics to data from state court dockets.

In addition to expanding into new areas, Lex Machina will add new analytics features, including around attorney data.

This is the path that companies such as Axiom Law (legal placement and outsourcing), Lex Machina (legal data analytics), KCura (Web - based e-discovery) and Anaqua (intellectual property asset management) have followed.

When LexisNexis acquired the legal analytics platform Lex Machina in November 2015, the plan was to use LexisNexis's collection of federal and state docket data to expand Lex Machina's analytics beyond its original area of intellectual property.

At the time of the acquisition, Jeff Pfeifer, VP of product management for LexisNexis, told me that the acquisition — which followed the acquisition of another legal analytics company, Lex Machina — was part of the company's broader vision «to create the data - driven lawyer of the future.»

Lex Machina says it spent several years developing this technology and it believes it is the only company that is trying to fix inaccurate PACER data.

Additional federal practice areas will come in 2017, after which Lex Machina will turn its attention to adding data from state dockets.

Lex Machina uses sophisticated analytics to mine data from intellectual property cases to reveal insights about judges, lawyers, parties and patents.

Since its acquisition in November 2015 by LexisNexis, Lex Machina has been using LexisNexis's collection of federal and state docket data to expand its analytics platform -LSB-...]

Josh Becker is the CEO of Lex Machina, a company that provides intellectual property litigation data and analytics to companies and law firms.

Josh Becker is the CEO of Lex Machina, a company that provides intellectual property litigation data and analytics to...

«They have a lot more copyright litigation than trademark litigation,» Brian Howard, legal data scientist and director of Analytics Services for Lex Machina, told Retail Dive.

Lex Machina will provide lawyers with complete data about who worked on what case.

In an acquisition that brings together cutting edge analytics with a trove of content, LexisNexis has acquired litigation data mining company Lex Machina, which through its Legal Analytics platform provides insights about judges, lawyers, parties and patents from IP litigation.

Meanwhile, Lex Machina, which is owned by Lexis Nexis, mines litigation data, revealing insights about judges, lawyers, parties, and the subjects of the cases themselves, culled from millions of pages of litigation information.

Relying on Lex Machina's data, the GAO's analysis of a representative sample of 500 lawsuits from 2007 to 2011 concluded that the number of overall defendants in patent infringement lawsuits increased by about 129 percent over this period.

Based on Lex Machina's data, between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2005, 884 cases reached contested, patent - specific judgment [1], whereas the same three - year period between -LSB-...]

This report draws on Lex Machina's unique and rich Legal Analytics data on U.S. District Courts and judges, law firms, parties, patents, case merits decisions, damages awards, and International Trade Commission (ITC) investigations and Administrative Law Judges (ALJs).

Very few studies have made use of new electronic resources such as Lex Machina, which provides full case dockets and other relevant data for intellectual property law cases.

The GAO turned to Lex Machina's extensive data set on patent cases to carry out the study and to illuminate the role that these NPEs have played over the last five years.

According to Lex Machina's data, 190 cases were filed on Wednesday, April 23 (compared to 31 the preceding Friday, 10 on Monday, 8 on -LSB-...]

The result is a comprehensive picture of the outcomes of modern patent litigation, one that confirms conventional wisdom in some respects but upends it in others... We used the Lex Machina database as our data source.

... data from Lex Machina); John R. Allison, Emerson H. Tiller, & Samantha Zyontz Patent Litigation and the Internet, 2012 STAN.

... LJ 677, 682 & n. 21 (2011)[hereinafter Allison et al., Patent Quality](using litigation data from Lex Machina); John R. Allison, Mark...

Lex Machina's trademark data lets you analyze federal cases with one or more claims involving Lanham Act violations, including claims of trademark infringement, trademark dilution, unfair competition, or cybersquatting, including declaratory judgment actions.

«When you look at it month by month, it was a low January and a low February and a much higher March,» noted Lex Machina legal data scientist Brian Howard.

Like Lex Machina, many of the newcomers rely on artificial intelligence and big - data technologies:

Based on data from Lex Machina's 2015 Patent Year in Review, the median damages award for patent cases is about $ 1.5 million, and approximately 90 % of awards are less than $ 50 million.

For each key feature, we will compare the attorney data publicly available through PACER with Lex Machina's view of the case.

«Despite the increasing number of arguments and lawsuits, there's a lack of reliable, unbiased data on the patterns and trends about trademark litigation in America,» said Owen Byrd, Lex Machina's Chief Evangelist.

According to Lex Machina's data, 190 cases were filed on Wednesday, April 23 (compared to 31 the preceding Friday, 10 on Monday, 8 on Tuesday, 39 on Thursday afterwards, and 20 on Friday).

Lex Machina has enhanced Pacer data to allow deeper and more granular analysis of cases and motions.

Drawing on data from Lex Machina's proprietary intellectual property litigation database, these quantified insights into time - to - injunction, findings of infringement or fair use, and damages won can be used to help attorneys budget cases and craft winning strategies for trademark litigation.

Today, Lex Machina is focused on providing our customers with the winning edge in the business and practice of law, but we remain committed to being a source of publicly available, highly reliable data — helping lawmakers and analysts better understand the major trends and issues in the patent litigation landscape.

That number jumped to 451 for the years 2014 to 2015, in a sign that «the pharmaceutical industry is feeling greater urgency and things are getting more intense,» Brian Howard, legal data scientist for Lex Machina, told the publication Corporate Counsel.

Lex Machina's First Annual Report on Bankruptcy Litigation in District Court Provides Insights and Data About the Complex World of Bankruptcy Appeals

• New data source and case linking: Existing Lex Machina case data is integrated with data from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to provide accurate MDL case counts.