Sentences with phrase «madam justice»

In assessing non-pecuniary damages at $ 115,000 Madam Justice Gray provided the following reasons:

The Honourable Madam Justice Jacelyn Ryan - Froslie * The Honourable Madam Justice Lian Schwann The Honourable Mr. Justice Peter Whitmore

In assessing non-pecuniary damages at $ 95,000 Madam Justice Brown provided the following reasons:...

In contrast Madam Justice Gauthier, in concurring reasons has earlier criticized the disclosure requirement [6] and held it should be lower for non-use patents (which in turn was expressly accepted in the recent Federal Court anti-disclosure jurisprudence).

Madam Justice Ryan's holding that «any interference with the right to put a ballot in the box must be justified under s. 1 of the Charter» will be helpful to any prospective challenge to the more restrictive voting process currently before Parliament.

«Moving from an honour system to an identity system will better protect against fraud,» wrote Madam Justice Ryan.

In the Henry case in British Columbia, the government was able to pass the third step of the Oakes test largely because, under the current rules, vouching is permitted: «Looking at the scheme as a whole, taking into account the broad range of options available for proof of identity and residence,» wrote Madam Justice Smith of the B.C. Supreme Court, «I am satisfied that there are no alternative, less drastic means of achieving both of Canada's legislative objectives in a real and substantial manner.»

(Thus I would think that Guy Pratte's connection with Quebec would not satisfy the Quebec Bar in replacing Madam Justice Deschamps, even if he is welcome in their courtrooms and offices.)

After the Icahn case, the dividing line once again came before our Court of Appeal in Khela v. Phoenix Homes Ltd., 2015 BCCA 202 in which Madam Justice Neilson re-affirmed the principle in Pasnak.

A few weeks ago I was in summary judgment motion scheduling court before Madam Justice Low.

Prior to her elevation to the bench, Madam Justice Kiteley was called to the Bar in Ontario in 1976; she was in private practice in Toronto for 19 years and was elected as a Bencher... [more]

Madam Justice Young held that the threshold for ordering that a report under s. 211 was low, by implication indicating that...

Madam Justice Dardi refused to make this order finding that there is no «principled basis» to do so.

Tags: bc injury law, Lally v. He, Madam Justice Warren Posted in ICBC Back Injury (soft tissue) Cases, ICBC Soft Tissue Injury Cases, ICBC Whiplash Cases Direct Link Comments Off top ^

Master Schlosser distinguished the case of Thomas v Beyer, [6] where Madam Justice Trussler was asked to permanently stay an RTDRS Order.

Madam Justice Young referred to the M.P.D. decision and found that a Hear the Child report can be ordered pursuant to s. 202 of the Family Law Act.

[114] In Jaszczewska v. Kostanski, Madam Justice Baker concisely summarized the law on the meaning of «significantly unfair»:

Madam Justice Loo disagreed and allowed the personal injury lawsuit to proceed.

«In relation to the considerations that serve to distinguish a policy decision from the operational decision, I continue to think that the four considerations referred to by Madam Justice McLachlin, as the trial judge in Just, are helpful and are unaffected by the decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in that case.

Madam Justice Leitch concluded at para. 103 that the publicly - funded benefits program was a matter of policy and, as such, even though there was no evidence to suggest the program would be terminated or the benefits would be reduced, there was no guarantee the benefits would continue.

Tags: formal settlement offers, Loser pays, Madam Justice Dardi, RUle 14, Rule 14 - 1, Rule 14 - 1 (9), Rule 9, Rule 9 - 1, Rule 9 - 1 (4), Rule 9 - 1 (5), Rule 9 - 1 (6), Rule 9 - 1 (6)(a), Wong v. Lee Posted in BC Supreme Court Costs Cases, BCSC Civil Rule 14, BCSC Civil Rule 9, Uncategorized Direct Link Comments Off top ^

Tags: bc injury law, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Harmati v. Williams, Madam Justice Choi, post traumatic stress disorder Posted in ICBC Psychological Injury Cases, ICBC PTSD Cases Direct Link Comments Off top ^

In assessing non-pecuniary damages at $ 100,000 Madam Justice Choi provided the following reasons:

Tags: bc injury law, Besic v. Kerenyi, jaw fracture, Madam Justice Russell, mandible injury, trigeminal nerve injury Posted in ICBC Dental Injury Cases, Uncategorized Direct Link 1 Comment» top ^

Tags: Anderson v. Kozniuk, Apportionment of Costs, bc injury law, Madam Justice Sharma, Negligence Act, Rule, Rule 9, Rule 9 - 1, Rule 9 - 1 (4), Rule 9 - 1 (5), Rule 9 - 1 (6) Posted in BC Supreme Court Costs Cases, BCSC Civil Rule 9 Direct Link Comments Off top ^

The Defendant was awarded costs with Madam Justice Ross giving ICBC the benefit of this costs award.

The government will also seek a stay of the ruling of Madam Justice Lynn Smith, which permits Gloria Taylor, suffering from ALS, to seek an assisted suicide when she so chose to do so through a rarely used constitutional exemption.

In assessing non-pecuniary damages at $ 100,000 for these injuries Madam Justice Duncan provided the following reasons:

Tags: bc injury law, Goguen v. Maddalena, Madam Justice Forth, Rule 9, Rule 9 - 1, Rule 9 - 1 (5), Rule 9 - 1 (6) Posted in BC Supreme Court Costs Cases, BCSC Civil Rule 9 Direct Link Comments Off top ^

Tags: bc injury law, madam justice baker, Rule 9, Rule 9 - 1, Rule 9 - 1 (5), Rule 9 - 1 (6) Posted in BC Supreme Court Costs Cases, BCSC Civil Rule 9 Direct Link Comments Off top ^

[16] The appellant relies in particular upon this court's decision in Chutter v. Chutter, 2008 BCCA 507, wherein Madam Justice Rowles, for the Court said, in considering a claim for compensatory spousal support:

Corrected: In upholding the ruling of Madam Justice Smith at trial, the Court of Appeal emphasized the fact - intensive evidence that was presented.

Also on Thursday, I had the chance to spend time with The Honourable Madam Justice Helen M. Pierce Regional Senior Judge for the Northwest Region, workers at the Ontario Native Women's Centre and legal aid administrators and staff lawyers (not only from Thunder Bay, but Sioux Lookout and Kenora).

The Honourable Madam Justice Lynn Smith said that while she recognized that risks do exist in allowing doctor - assisted suicide, they can be avoided through carefully designed and vigorously monitored safeguards.

Madam Justice Newbury considered other appellate decisions in which both an original tribunal decision and a reconsideration were at issue.

Madam Justice Corthorn comments in her decision that the reasoning behind the requirement for an oral hearing is that it allows for judicial oversight where a formal action — and all the information that is provided to the court in that particular context (for example, the parties» pleadings)-- has not yet been commenced.

In A.A. v. S.N.A., 2009 BCSC 387 Madam Justice Martinson made the following comments which I emphatically endorse:

This month the NSRLP would like to highlight a recent decision by the Honourable Madam Justice Kristjanson of the Superior Court of Justice for Ontario.

Following her review of the materials filed by the plaintiff's lawyer and her thorough analysis of the rules governing court approval of settlements for persons under disability, Madam Justice Corthorn noted that there were a number of procedural and substantive problems with the materials before her, including but not limited to the fact that the application record was not served on the respondent and no factum had been filed by the applicant.

In a separate matter, the litigants are described by Madam Justice Saunders as having been the architects of a «quagmire».

As a result, not only did Madam Justice Corthorn conclude that the matter would have to return before her at a later date, she also concluded that the Rules required the application to proceed by way of an oral hearing rather than in writing.

In her decision, Madam Justice Sylvia Corthorn of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice completed a thorough review of the two methods for obtaining court approval of a settlement: by way of an application or by way of a motion.

This month the NSRLP would like to highlight a recent decision by the Honourable Madam Justice Kristjanson of the... read more

Tags: bc injury law, Litt v. Guo, Madam Justice Fenlon, multiple defence medical exams, Rule 7, Rule 7 - 6, Rule 7 - 6 (1), Rule 7 - 6 (2), subsequent medical exams Posted in BCSC Civil Rule 7, independent medical exams, Uncategorized Direct Link Comments Off top ^

In assessing non-pecuniary damages at $ 80,000 Madam Justice Gropper made the following findings:

Importance: Madam Justice Paperny writing for a unanimous court concluded the decision of the trial judge to extend the common law rule against spousal compellability to common law spouses represents an appropriate incremental change to the law.

In Ontario, the reasoning in Shore has been cited with approval in obiter in Slepenkova v. Ivanov16 and applied in Wright v. Young and Rubicam Group of Companies (Wunderman) 17 and in the 2016 decision Garreton v Complete Innovations Inc. 18 In Rubicam Madam Justice Low explained her reasoning at para. 36:

In depriving the Defendant of double costs Madam Justice Sharma expressed concern about the Defendant's reluctance to include full costs in their offers and noted as follows:

In coming to this conclusion Madam Justice Fenlon referred to and summarized 2 previous authorities dealing with this issue at paragraphs 8 - 13 and went on to hold as follows:

Tags: bc injury law, costs, Lanz v. Silver Lady Limousine Service Ltd., Madam Justice Sharma Posted in BC Supreme Court Costs Cases Direct Link Comments Off top ^