Not exact matches
Without the
Magisterium any attempt to
interpret the scriptures inevitably falls into fundamentalism or liberalism.
At this level the question has to be answered primarily in terms of revelation, as it comes to us through Scripture and tradition,
interpreted with the guidance of the ecclesiastical
magisterium.
Even with a
magisterium, Catholicism has its own internal debates as to what weight to give to what authorities and how to
interpret them in light of one another.
... the texts bequeathed by the [Second Vatican] Council Fathers... need to be read correctly, to be widely known and taken to heart as important and normative texts of the
Magisterium, within the Church's Tradition... «if we
interpret and implement guided by a right hermeneutic».
The seven articulate a position that the faith of the church is preserved in the
magisterium (i.e., the official teaching office of the church) and that theologians should
interpret that given body of truth.
By an opaque concept of revelation, 1 mean that familiar amalgamation of three levels of language in one form of traditional teaching about revelation: first, the level of the confession of faith where the lex credendi is not separated from the lex orandi; second, the level of ecclesial dogma where a historic community
interprets for itself and for others the understanding of faith specific to its tradition; and third, the body of doctrines imposed by the
magisterium as the rule of orthodoxy.
This is why the
Magisterium of The Church does the
interpreting.
If one does not understand and can not
interpret the meaning of a non-infallible teaching of the
magisterium, given by Vatican II or in, say, an encyclical, one can not give the assent asked for in the Church's own Profession of Faith and Oath of Fidelityrequired of candidates for Holy Orders and of others.