An article entitled «Winning a Medical
Malpractice Plaintiff Verdict on the Merits,» authored by Jeffrey N. Catalano, a partner at Todd & Weld LLP, was published in the August 2010 edition of Massachusetts Lawyers Journal.
Not exact matches
Dismissing the complaints of tort reformists who argue that inflated jury
verdicts in medical -
malpractice cases are creating a crisis in the insurance industry, Satin says any
plaintiffs» lawyer worth his salt knows that it doesn't pay to take on a bad case hoping for a settlement.
Jordan recently received a jury
verdict award in excess of $ 2.2 million in a
plaintiff's medical
malpractice case against a doctor and a surgical center.
«To summarize,
plaintiff now has no negligence claim and no medical
malpractice claim, all despite the fact that (a) defendant - hospital openly admitted negligence, (b) a jury determined that this negligence constituted the proximate cause of
plaintiff's death, and (c) a jury awarded
plaintiff a $ 20 million
verdict,» wrote Markman in his ruling.
The Michigan Supreme Court called it a «medical and legal dereliction,» further stating, «To summarize,
plaintiff now has no negligence claim and no medical
malpractice claim, all despite the fact that (a) defendant - hospital openly admitted negligence, (b) a jury determined that this negligence constituted the
plaintiff's cause of death, and (c) a jury awarded
plaintiff a $ 20 million
verdict.»
Note: due to the high number of medical
malpractice cases covered each year, we include only the top 100
plaintiff's
verdicts.
A Virginia judge has rejected a defendant doctor's motion for a new trial after a $ 1.95 million medical
malpractice verdict for the
plaintiff who died following plastic surgery.
The reversal of this
verdict highlights a primary element that is necessary for Florida medical
malpractice plaintiffs.
$ 2.5 million ($ 4.12 with interest)- Medical
Malpractice Middlesex Superior Court Date of
verdict: November 2007
Plaintiff's counsel: Suzanne C.M. McDonough and Nicholas D. Cappiello, Lubin & Meyer, Boston
After a jury returned a
verdict in favor of the doctor in a medical
malpractice case, an estate executor appealed on two questions of abuse of discretion: limitations on the scope of questions during the defendant's deposition, and refusal of jury instructions tendered by the
plaintiff.
$ 23.4 Million - Infant injured by «inexperienced» doctor Medical
malpractice: Antonelli, et al. v. Halladay Middlesex Superior Court, No. 99 - 4391 Date of
verdict: Aug. 17, 2005
Plaintiff's attorney: Robert M. Higgins, Lubin & Meyer, Boston Status of
verdict: Paid, subject to a high - low agreement
He comments on the fact that
malpractice lawsuits and
plaintiff verdicts have become increasingly rare even though there remains an epidemic of medical errors.
«It's rather startling that in six provinces and three territories there wasn't a single
verdict in favour of the
plaintiff in 2016,» says Gary Wagner of Wagners, a personal injury law firm based in Halifax that does medical
malpractice cases in the four Atlantic provinces and some in Alberta.
«We see more and more the disparity between Ontario awards reported and those that appear across the rest of the country,» he says, pointing to information from the Canadian Medical Protective Association from 2016 that indicate there wasn't a single
verdict in favour of a medical
malpractice plaintiff in Saskatchewan, Manitoba and Atlantic Canada or the Territories.