Man U spent 150MILLION, where are they?
Man U spent trillions and are awful.
I still say the money
Man U spent on him would get you a Reus, Lewa, Goetzer (sp), Cavani, Bezema.
Man U spent # 250 million and finished... wait for it... 5th.
As an example
Man U spent # 150m on there rebuild attempt.
Man U spent mega and are still struggling.
Not exact matches
They club is too business like to overspend to get them back in like
Man U did; so they'll
spend the next decade wandering between midtable and the Europa League.
We don't have the money, ambition (of the owner), or the reputation, to
spend and attract the world's best players like
Man U or City could should they finish outside the top 4.
We don't need a child when the likes of
Man U, City, looserpool are
spending big and buying good, I have to admit.
Man U and others also
spent wrongly, hired wrong managers, bought wrong players, adopted wrong formations etc..
Sure we could improve on Cech but given that we are a club that will not
spend what a
Man U has
spend the last several seasons, with Cech and Ospina in our squad would upgrading really be a priority?
Sometimes I shudder to think what would happen if Wenger
spent half the money
spent by
Man U in the last few years with little to show.
players round the world see the
Man U board as not having changed their attitude to
spend big.
Moving on from it all for this season i fear for worst to come next season (just had a deja vu i say the same thing every season around this time) City already are talking
spending 600 Million in the next two to three years on new players and you can bet
Man -
U will follow to try and close the gap, Liverpool can sell one player and buy an entire squad, Chelsea owner Abromovich has started to make noise's about next season so they will be
spending, spuds will try to keep their existing players with one or two additions to strengthen and some salary rises to keep the elite, and Arsenal will go head to head with the likes of Burnley Everton Leicester for average players signature, and the board will make sure even if they replace AW they will replace him with AW No2 who will do what the board decides on who and how much to
spend
Catergory C — Those who
spend and balance their books at profit e.g Arsenal, Sir Ferg's
Man U, Athletico, etc
I pray
Man U suffer a few early defeats — then the pressure of his last year failures and more big
spending will really be on
We need to star from scratch and
spend, like
Man U, and we will get back on track.
Category A - Clubs who
spent huge sum on players for perceived integrity of their clubs, imediate results and / or internal politics e.g R. Madrid, Barcelona,
Man City, Chelsea, Recent
Man U, PSG, Juve etc..
Man U beat Barcelona so clearly man U are the best team in Europe Barca are a spent force Rooney 2nd best striker after Courtois who won the game for Chelsea Preseason joll
Man U beat Barcelona so clearly
man U are the best team in Europe Barca are a spent force Rooney 2nd best striker after Courtois who won the game for Chelsea Preseason joll
man U are the best team in Europe Barca are a
spent force Rooney 2nd best striker after Courtois who won the game for Chelsea Preseason jollies
Man U is still so big their financial returns allow them to
spend big also.
Klopp's situation makes me respect Wenger even more BVB have only really sold 2 superstars well maybe 3 but they got Kagawa back (not that he was a superstar at
Man U) but they've got a really strong squad and they've
spend a lot of money on replacements for the likes of lewandowski.
unless we
spend money like
man U did this season.
Man U And Shitty will
spend a combined billion to make respected runs @ the EPL and Champions League title next season.
Hahah wow some people
man, so you wanted wenger to be our manager in one of the most, if not the most difficult time for football clubs where he is heavily restricted while EXPECTED to keep us in the top 4 and relevant while man city, Chelsea, Man U, and even liverpool spend ludicrous amounts of mon
man, so you wanted wenger to be our manager in one of the most, if not the most difficult time for football clubs where he is heavily restricted while EXPECTED to keep us in the top 4 and relevant while
man city, Chelsea, Man U, and even liverpool spend ludicrous amounts of mon
man city, Chelsea,
Man U, and even liverpool spend ludicrous amounts of mon
Man U, and even liverpool
spend ludicrous amounts of money.
Man U suffered from change of coaches, while
spending big in the past 4 seasons, they have not been able to make any meaningful challenges to the title mainly because they are virtually rebuilding every two seasons.
First of all
Man,
U have
spent huge amounts of money in a fashion no new manager at Arsenal will be granted, second of all most
Man U fans will not consider
Man U as having been turned around.
Arsenal may not have
spent as much money as
Man U or
Man C or Chelsea recently, but we've not won the league whilst those other clubs have all won it more than once.
If mere addition or
spending of money ensured success then
Man U would not be struggling!
Man U had to
spend 30 mil on a BACKUP for crying out loud!
Man U have
spent huge this season and haven't coasted in to the top four by any means.
I agree we need better negotiations and all that but it's a simple solution for arsenal
SPEND MORE MONEY GETS
U BETTER PLAYERS just look at
Man City,
Man Utd, Chelsea theyve all got different negotiating teams but get the same out come which is signing the players they need in a short space of time, some times 2 players from the same club!
his comments abt
man city spending to justify not spending sums up his intentions.AND TO KNOW THAT THE MAN HAS GOT SO MANY OTHER FRANCHISES / CLUBS IN USA JUST GOES ONTO SHOW HE AI NT SERIOUS WITH EITHER OF THEM, RATHER ITS ALL ABT ACQUIRING MORE WEALTH.COS LETS BE HONEST, U CANT MANAGE WELL SO MANY TEAMS.IF AN OWNER REALLY HAD ANY INTENTION TO IMPROVE, THEN THEY WUD HAV MAYBE 1 OR AT MAX 2 TEAMS AND FOCUS ON THEM.i maybe wrong, but stan gives me all the wrong vibes.whatever ppl say abt man city, i got ta admit they are giving their best for the club.a good finance manager and a level - headed coach will fix their problem of excessive spendi
man city
spending to justify not
spending sums up his intentions.AND TO KNOW THAT THE
MAN HAS GOT SO MANY OTHER FRANCHISES / CLUBS IN USA JUST GOES ONTO SHOW HE AI NT SERIOUS WITH EITHER OF THEM, RATHER ITS ALL ABT ACQUIRING MORE WEALTH.COS LETS BE HONEST, U CANT MANAGE WELL SO MANY TEAMS.IF AN OWNER REALLY HAD ANY INTENTION TO IMPROVE, THEN THEY WUD HAV MAYBE 1 OR AT MAX 2 TEAMS AND FOCUS ON THEM.i maybe wrong, but stan gives me all the wrong vibes.whatever ppl say abt man city, i got ta admit they are giving their best for the club.a good finance manager and a level - headed coach will fix their problem of excessive spendi
MAN HAS GOT SO MANY OTHER FRANCHISES / CLUBS IN USA JUST GOES ONTO SHOW HE AI NT SERIOUS WITH EITHER OF THEM, RATHER ITS ALL ABT ACQUIRING MORE WEALTH.COS LETS BE HONEST,
U CANT MANAGE WELL SO MANY TEAMS.IF AN OWNER REALLY HAD ANY INTENTION TO IMPROVE, THEN THEY WUD HAV MAYBE 1 OR AT MAX 2 TEAMS AND FOCUS ON THEM.i maybe wrong, but stan gives me all the wrong vibes.whatever ppl say abt
man city, i got ta admit they are giving their best for the club.a good finance manager and a level - headed coach will fix their problem of excessive spendi
man city, i got ta admit they are giving their best for the club.a good finance manager and a level - headed coach will fix their problem of excessive
spending!
Arsenal went form being in the mix of a half dozen teams right behind
Man U resource-wise to being solidly fourth in the league in terms of
spending power.
I do nt think
Man - U are interested in who we are after, we are looking for 10 Million pound man Man - U are looking for 100 million man, we should worry more about midd to bottom table clubs who now have money to spend thanks to the TV rights, if any descent player are linked with us is a media hipe or we offer way below asking pri
Man -
U are interested in who we are after, we are looking for 10 Million pound
man Man - U are looking for 100 million man, we should worry more about midd to bottom table clubs who now have money to spend thanks to the TV rights, if any descent player are linked with us is a media hipe or we offer way below asking pri
man Man - U are looking for 100 million man, we should worry more about midd to bottom table clubs who now have money to spend thanks to the TV rights, if any descent player are linked with us is a media hipe or we offer way below asking pri
Man -
U are looking for 100 million
man, we should worry more about midd to bottom table clubs who now have money to spend thanks to the TV rights, if any descent player are linked with us is a media hipe or we offer way below asking pri
man, we should worry more about midd to bottom table clubs who now have money to
spend thanks to the TV rights, if any descent player are linked with us is a media hipe or we offer way below asking price,
Sounds allot but
Man U, Liverpool, Chelsea
spent more than this throughout last year.
We need to realize we won't
spend like
Man City, Chelski or
Man U so need to become clever with our
spending but desicive!!!!
Man U Gk de gea, lindergarrd, Amos they will have to
spend big to replace him or stick with Valdez) Def Raffael?evans Mid cleverly, di Maria?
Money is there just
spend it not out of control (look at
Man U...) but savvy
spending with potential game changer players with little to no injury records
This is trial and error
spending on an unprecedented scale — christ, if they can't put a decent team on the field now then
Man U should pack it in and call it a day.
And I can not see Wenger
spend # 35 millions for someone so obvious... I think he will go to
Man U or Juventus (especially if Pogba leaves).
However, our hesitation means that we now have to deal with the likes of Barca,
Man U and Liverpool all of which are more comfortable than we are with
spending money and making decisions.
There are about five teams above Arsenal in the world with
spending power to lure a Sanchez, and
Man U is at the top.
considering we didn't
spend like
Man U, and don't pay salaries like
Man shity and Chelshit...
Man City,
Man U, Arsenal, and Chelsea will
spend # 1,000,000,000 between them to upgrade.
Man U are prepared to
spend huge and risk losing huge in the quest to win the title again.
I would like to meet 1 yes 1 Arsenal fan who is behind Wenger he's a blatant liar, and I predict this is the end for him, we may win a few games this year but we are an embarrassment, how can a manager turn down Balotelli Remy Vela and then agree to Welbeck I'm lost for words, wil will suffer this year, I don't blame welbeck he's a genuine lad who works hard but he's not a CF who will bang in 25 there are teams who are better then us and I hate to say it but City Chelsea Liverpool Even
Man U at the end of this window will be better Then Everton Lukaka Swansea Bomy I'm devastated this is the worst ever time as a gunner at least I forgave him when we built the ground but now we have No excuse I will not be
spending # 250 to travel to see them this season
The SUN reports that
Man U have
spent 600 million in 4 years to try to regain lost glory all to no avail.
Liverpool trying to resurrect an empire through
spending and
Man U trying to stop an empire sliding over the edge of a cliff through even more drastic
spending.
The club won't or can't compete with the likes of the Manchester clubs and even
Man U despite
spending a fortunate since Fergie left.
Man U has
spent in excess of 150 million pounds this season and Liverpool has
spent in excess of 100 million.