Sentences with phrase «man u squad»

I gues we need the whole Man U squad to get injured then we can beat them LMOA
Bottom line, Wenger puts too much faith in average players whereas Pellegrini, Mourinho would replace them with upgrades, even Van Gaal is set to completely get rid of the Tom Cleverly's in the Man U squad.
I've never seen a Man U squad look so discombobulated as it is now.

Not exact matches

Sure we could improve on Cech but given that we are a club that will not spend what a Man U has spend the last several seasons, with Cech and Ospina in our squad would upgrading really be a priority?
With the current squad, winning the EPL is possible if some matter of misfortune (injuries, etc) falls on our top competitors (Chelsea, Man U, Man City).
They have depth in their squads, marquee signings to up the tempo, look at Man U, City, Liverpool, Stoke.
Considering Chelsea, Man U, Man City, L'Pool, Everton, Swansea, Spurs and even Stoke City fixtures both home and away, I see us getting more losses with AW as coach and his squad.
They were in the Man U and Man City squads winning things and I don't remember any of their fans complaining about them.
Pep needs time and has to rejuvenate his squad and Man U seem to be where Chelsea was a few months ago when they were beginning to gel.
Play the strongest team available do not underestimate any team in the premier league especially as every teams squad has been improved.There is absolutely no point in destroying Man U and then losing to Watford due to playing a weaken team.Get the game won and then make the changes in the last 20 minutes or so.
In one vein they praise Man U for buying a 19 year old former Monaco player for over 35m pounds while in the other they criticize Wenger for including Adelaide in the squad and call Oxlade at 22 years still young.
Man U's problem is the manager, not the squad.
l certainly do not see us even getting a point from Man U if we do not strengthen our squad and Man U continue playing the way they are playing.
Moving on from it all for this season i fear for worst to come next season (just had a deja vu i say the same thing every season around this time) City already are talking spending 600 Million in the next two to three years on new players and you can bet Man - U will follow to try and close the gap, Liverpool can sell one player and buy an entire squad, Chelsea owner Abromovich has started to make noise's about next season so they will be spending, spuds will try to keep their existing players with one or two additions to strengthen and some salary rises to keep the elite, and Arsenal will go head to head with the likes of Burnley Everton Leicester for average players signature, and the board will make sure even if they replace AW they will replace him with AW No2 who will do what the board decides on who and how much to spend
Klopp's situation makes me respect Wenger even more BVB have only really sold 2 superstars well maybe 3 but they got Kagawa back (not that he was a superstar at Man U) but they've got a really strong squad and they've spend a lot of money on replacements for the likes of lewandowski.
Do you honestly believe that with the current squad we can stand up to Man U or Man City with the way they are playing now?
Also with many games on the trot coming up against Spurs and Man U followed by Southampton Wenger needed to shuffle the squad a little bit.
Man U is the strongest squad in he EPL presently, and watchout for Everton!
Van Gaal's failure at Man U is IMO just because he is not as exceptional as everyone liked to think and he had a squad that was lacking a bit.
The fact that it is not the usual Man U, Chelsea, and Liverpool that are squaring would us for the top positions, shows us that there is a lot more to it than just having a squad that's» good enough» on paper to win things.
Let us not forget that this is a squad which won 6 games in a row beating Man U, Everton, our bogey teams Southampton and Stoke and defeating Man City and Chelsea to lift the FA trophy for the third time in 4 years.
I'm not having it, their squad is no longer at its peak and Man U are still 5 players away from being genuine contenders.
Man U and City will improve much more than this season will improve the squad by making signings like Griezmanns and Aubameyangs.
I don't think the Chelsea squad is superior to City, Spurs, Arsenal or even Man U (same with Leicester last season).
You list Man U's and Man C's impressive striker roster but don't mention that they both play with 2 up front so need double the number of squad strikers.
Mourinho as much as I hate him had one season at Man U assessed his squad and in the window bought what was needed and now they look like the Manchester of old.
BUT what angers me most is the fact that Arsenal is a VERY VERY big club which can easily match them, better them, or even be at par (its not all about the money its also about the manager forming a title winning squad within the available funds), we've seen this at Man U (fergie time), Dortmund, Athletico, etc..
Now I think there is still reasons to be cheerful, I agree Man C & Chelski have spent & bought some good players, we all understand that 5 of those teams might be in the CL proper which is a huge distraction for those 4 - 5 teams.Chelsea will not be able to field the same 13 - 14 players all season, as for Man C they were very frail at the back last season, add to that 2 flying wing backs and I'm not sure they will be any better this coming season.LFC will most probably have CL as well if they qualify and haven't exactly bought great players apart from Salah who could be a good aquasistion for them.Spuds have sold a good player & strengthened a rival & still not bought a single player yet, Man U have bought 2 good players & in Lukaku have a proven goal scorer in the PL but if they play the same dour way they did last season & with the added games the CL brings will they perform week in week out in the league??? As for Everton yes they have released a lot of players and also brought in a lot too to give better quality in the squad as they have Europa league the same as US the big difference is I think we will play squad players & youngsters maybe with a few senior players all the way up to the QF This tells me most of our rivals will pave the way for us to field pretty much the same side every weekend in the PL thus giving us an advantage over all the other 5 teams playing in the CL & Europa, just remember the League has been won in the last 2 seasons by teams NOT in Europe YES we are this season but I think Wenger will put all his eggs in the League basket and field an under strength side in all comps hence focusing on the League until we are no longer in the race.
These three don't play every week anyway and Man U have a very expensive squad so don't expect anything else but a really tough game.
I'm sorry the squad is thin and we need 2 cd a RB LB and a CF. I no Man U have paid stupid money but he has players they need but AW just won't spend or is it players just don't want to play for him anymore.
I agree with those odds simply because i believe the some team that were stronger than Arsenal last season have done some really good business to further strengthen there squads, Bernardo Silva & Kyle Walker for Man City with what they already have plus what pep will add plus its gonna be his second season so he will be a bit more familiar with the EPL and this may make them really tough to beat, Tiemoue Bakayoko & Antonio Rudiger Chealsea plus a top striker and Chelsea will sill be one of the teams to beat, Tottenham are gonna be solid, they've kept the team together and Victor Lindelof & Romelu Lukaku for Man - u and Mourinho is not done yet if the rumors are true and there also the Mourinho second season thing, as much as i'd like to be hopeful for next season, i really do nt think Lacazette and Kolasinac are enough to make us challenge for the league plus having Europa league will give the team less time to recover for the weekend games, the formation change is the only thing i see can make the difference.
4th Liverpool have crept ahead of Man U in terms of squad depth / value they replaced well except Suarez obviously but added four players who are not replacements (lovren, can, lambert, lallana) so they will be a stronger squad.
i don't think now is time to take chances, i hear Man - U will spend 350 million pounds in the next two years Chelsea who is already a full squad and still toying with the idea of buying Messi, City will sell few deadwood and buy big and we are thinking of signing 38 year old striker, i love TH but come on guys we are suppose to be fighting back to greatness and catch up to Europe's elite, Man - U is linked wit every player we the Arsenal supporters are asking for and guess who will buy them.
-- Man City — Strong attack — balanced midfield — average defence — good squad depth — Spurs — Strong attack — relatively balanced midfield — good defence — small squad (no bench)-- Man U — Average attack — physical midfield — good defence — good squad depth — Lpool — Relatively good attack — average midfield — average defence — no quality on the bench — Arsenal — Relatively good attack — average midfield — good defence — good squad depth
These teams Spurs, Man U, Man City, Liverpool, Stoke are away fixtures in the 2nd half of the season so Wenger would be absolutely delusional if he didn't strengthen our depleted squad!
Better to get a cheap player that improves the squad than to do what Man U did when they signed Di Maria and Falcao.
But since the player wants to be with us, and Man U were desperate to sell with now 3 big wage strikers in the squad and it's deadline day, Wenger gets lucky with this one.
Personally, I feel its always a plus to have quality on the bench, this how all the big winning squads do (Chelsea, Man u, Real).
It could be suicidal if LFC OWNERS fail to bolster the squad; if the services of van Djk can be attained Klavan ca be deployed at left back and Milner be deployed at right wing where Mane operated; I love LFC to an extent I divorced my wife because she backed Man, U
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z