Sentences with phrase «manure players»

I'd say he was one of the better Manure players in an otherwise unconvincing squad.

They were not scared to shoot when needed and got in the face of Manure players.

Manure players convinced the red faced one to buy Ronaldo otherwise he would have been probably now an Arsenal legend.

These players were in a team coached by THE most successful side (s) in British Football History.Their Manager DEMANDED and EXPECTED nothing less than TOTAL SUCESS.His players had drummed into them that nothing but winning would be acceptable.It was common to hear of all Manure players taking control of their team and with this brought years of domination of the EPL and contention in the CL on a regular basis.

If he would be an Manure player people would make songs about him, lol.

Paul pogba is soon a manure player, citeh set to announce a triple signing in Jesus, stones and sane

Jamie Carragher and the X manure player (I've forgoten his name) have promised not to do selfies because their too ugly.

Not exact matches

It used to be just arsenal and the tossers unable to hold on to their players but now manure and Liverpool are having the same problems.

He and ozil are our only world class players and we cant afford to have them missing for manure

I don't know... 3pl trophies in 20 seasons, no champions league, only made to final once in 18 CONSECUTIVE seasons, not resected like fergie was in his time, has never defeated jose mourinho even once in his lifetime even after maureen makes fun of him like hell (my God,6 - 0 in his 1000 game - > what a shame), an 8 - 2 loss at old trafford (only reason he bought players otherwise that season would have been hell), been rated as one of the wealthiest clubs but we still have mediocre first team players like giroud, welbeck etc (before u slam me first answer this - > would they get into bayern, barca, madrid, manure, mancity, psg or even chelsea starting 11 cz we rank the same with them financially)?????.....

Examples are all there, Manure and Tottenham spent big and did not improve, and on the other hand Chelsea did spend and that won them the league (Matic, Fab, and Costa)... It is always positive to bring better players and then it is about how you utilize them and get the best out of them...

How has this been allowed to happen?We were assured the days of selling our best players to our rivals were over.WENGER guess what?We HATE MANURE We HATE MOURINIO and We HATE YOU.Just GO PLEASE

Everytime I hear Manure or Tottenham and City bought 12 players for 100 million I am happy because I know that team will hit balance in one year time.

Next season wenger leaves... Sanchez and ozil follow... New players get bought... The team becomes manure... 10 years will pass....

Manure bring in maureen and buy pretty much any player they want an are also below us.

So Sanchez didn't know what was on offer at Manure until AFC agreed to negotiate with the buying club?Agents talk to Clubs and other Agents all the time.Most deals are agreed with the players before the clubs have even agreed the price.

he went for the p as manure style of football is suicide for every player who thinks of himself as a player who loves the sport.

Mismanagement of defensive signings, including the midfield, which would've improved results and persuaded Sanchez to stay, leading to us failing to qualify for the UCL, mismanagement of the team and dithering, mismanagement of Sanchez — if he hadn't signed a new contract, he should've been sold abroad, NOT again rubbing loyal fans noses in the Manure, who pay DOUBLE the ticket costs of Manure fans as Manure AGAIN show their financial superiority swiping our best player, and wheeling out Alex Ferguson.

If Sanchez is fit, its a no brainer for him to play however if he's not 100 %, I would rather he's rested against manure.he's a very important player in our tittle chase, so I prefer he's missed in one game rather than miss a couple of weeks, which could happen if he's unduly risked.for the midfield, le coq and boomer.yea carzola's absence has been felt however xhaka had his best game so far against spuds, only problem was the massive physical presence of dembele and wanyama, which fortunately manure can not boast off.so I expect we dominate them with combination of lecoq's tackling and xhaka's intricate passes and his extra physical presence.

Nabil Fakir will give us much more offensively than Ramsey.If Manure and Chelski offer the right sort of money let him go.Good player but we can get better for the money.

There never was a chance that a top - top player will join Arsenal when the likes of chavsky manure and mancity can offer better squad and better wages.

Specially manure... but we are not even close to buying the bpl, we are not even signing the two players we need so badly.

I do not see how a draw such as this is useful no matter the justifications some are trying to put up here... the big question shd be WHAT WERE OUR AMBITIONS AND TARGETS THIS PARTICULAR SEASON???... if we fail to win the league then this wld be a BIG failure and the back has to stop with somebody.we played the manure and the swansea game with 11 players and all we had was nothin and the damn red card today shn't be an excuse for anything... remember city thrashed astonvilla 4 - 0!!!

he is really a player for a club like Stoke or West Ham... No offence intended... He shouldn't be starting at manure but he is... Block his headers and get past De gea..

The story repeats, if anyone followed his stay with MANURE, he had flashes of brilliance everyone thought he was the next best thing, only to disappear as fast as he rose, he then spent half of last season on the bench with Marouane, till MANURE found a team really desperate (US), who missed great opportunities to sign World class Strikers, to dump him, better yet they got TOP dollars for a barely above average Player....

It's time we sign a player from shittty... manure, Chelsea have sold to us why not shittty.

I just love how manure ex players love to talk manure about our club.

For the love of Thor, put some players in who can beat their men and put some pressure against manure.

1) Just say Wenger had done a Manure bonkers trolley dash in the last year and spent # 250M + on 6 new first team players (say Reus, Khedira, Falcao, Vidal, Carvalho, Hummels and Fabregas — the minimum expectation for some on here!).

Wenger gets this massive hype going that we are the best thing since sliced bread until the game plan and players go to S ## T. losing at home to villa, losing 8 - 2 to manure, today againt WH all in august.

Look at Manure a FOOL team squad got bitten by the less known players at home.

They are usually very efficient in converting these chances from counter attack but on that day they were lacking a striker with pace (costa and remy both out) and the only player that posed constant threat to manures inexperienced back 4 was Hazard.

Who the fu ck is Carvalho and why didn't Manure who was in dire need of defensive players paid the small price to have him?

You're spot on Olis — Manure and Liverfool have had to spend big and bring in lots of players because they didn't buy well last year.

With the arms race of spending soon to begin amongst City, Manure and Checlsea why would Arsenals best players remain in the England to play for the least ambitious and most frugal club

You simple cant offer a player 130k when manure offers him 200k and City 300k.

It has come to this thanks to Wenger, missing out another above average player such as Giroud, we had hopes with Welbeck as he had a couple of good games, but don't forget he is a REJECT from MANURE and he was the best that Wenger could find the stingy POS brought ARSENAL to this a midlevel team....

In my opinion, early kick offs tend to benefit our player as they have slipped occasionally when our rivals had games before us in which they dropped points and we only needed wins to move up ahead.playing manure is tough enough without the added pressure of trying to catch up or go ahead based on result of other rivals.

Just look at manure, now lots of people are calling them title contenders cuz they have invested on quality players.

My main point is everyone knows we are 3 players short of competing for everything and we chose to throw this away, if we don't finish 4 th we will have the same problem as manure spend way over the odds for players

But on the other hand, after all his contributions for out team in the past few seasons, i'm happy for him because he stands a better chance to win something with Manure than our club, that hurts more (even Ian Wright confessed that), we cant even assure a top class player of anything anymore,,, i» scared for ozil and wilshere leaving too....

They won't fit in this formation as both are a waste wide, and we know Wenger will play Ozil what ever happens, for me welbeck is another similar type player to what we have, I think wenger panicked and we know from SS that welbeck contacted us and said he wanted to join City and Chelsea are MILES ahead of us Liverpool have a better balanced squad which is also deeper If this is true we are fighting Manure / Spuds and Everton for 4 th

Now talking about Welbeck and his goal against manure and similar performance, thats exactly what he does he gives you an outstanding performance once in many games, thats not what we need, we need players that will give a good level of consistency in almost every game.

Its a pity that Wenger went for a top top top player in the person of a reject in Manure.

The Scwheni signing hurts deep down, it hurts to see manure spend so much on world class players while we keep faith in flamini and arteta... this is a joke

before all the retards start giving thumbs down just do a quick round up of who we sold and bought and you will figure out that we have just spent 30 mil on players and look at manure they are getting di maria for 63mil... just a shame... this is rubbish, we have no chance if we do nt spend on a strker, defender and a holding midf... I'm sorry for myself and all arsenal supporters.

Now let's see who got the better deal manure or us over the swap and how Ozil staying affects the rest of the players.

Not strictly true, Manure have spent way more, Liverpool have spent more, as have Manchester City, although their overall spending has come slightly under ours due to Roma making Djeko's transfer deal permanent, but then they have bought what's regarded as the best manager in the world, which doesn't come into player spending.

Can't believe we still have flamini in our ranks while manure are adding players like deepay and Scwheni.

Dats y we won all dose games nao... and dat besiktas match, he had several chances to play d final pass wch he just cudnt...... and he called him our best player against city, spurs and manure cos he was tryin to do everytin and dat was y we ddnt win...... he ddnt even start away to villa and we won convincingly