Every place we touch people, we have
accepted the belief that people are like machines.
I am sorry you need to trick yourself into being happy, there is a growing number of atheist in the world and you will just have to
accept your belief system is slowly... but surely dieing.
The most commonly
accepted belief is that Paul was using this word to describe those who call on male prostitutes.
It is none of your damn business if
I accept your belief system or not.
I wish some Calvinist would answer why do
you accept this belief system just because you believe in the sovereignty of God doesn't mean He doesn't allow things to happen by its own accord
If
you accept beliefs that others tell you is true.
Islam calls upon all people to
accept its beliefs and code of laws regardless of race, sex, color, rank, or any other difference.
It can't be demonstrated to non-believers until
they accept the belief.
Islam, in its invitation to
accept its beliefs and to submit to its rules, rejects any methods which are not based on liberality and freedom of choice.
We wouldn't care about your myths if they weren't thrown at us from every direction, usually starting in childhood where the defenseless are forced to
accept belief systems.
where an ideology or belief claims «certainty» but only through
accepting that belief can one know «true» knowledge.
Steps were sure to be taken by the civil magistrates against any individual, church, or minister that deviated from the synod's declarations or advocated something contrary to the generally
accepted beliefs or practices.
I have met several people who don't believe in a higher power who have come to
accept the belief that there is no life after death.
Atheists don't preach that that their invisible all powerful god will send people to hell for not
accepting their beliefs.
I think I can only respond to your succinct comments as: I can not always see what my fellow human being sees, but I can
accept their belief, or none, and respond with love and respect to their human right to see and hear what they see and hear.
Being «safe rather than sorry» is a completely selfish motivation then, and I'd rather live my life unselfishly and risk the remote chance of hell than choose to
accept beliefs that I can't justify in our modern society, some of which actually hurt others, just to save my butt.
Not to go back to my Twilight an alogy but regardless how many fan's you get together who want to believe in vampires, the burden of proof rests with them if they want everyone else to
accept their belief and adopt laws giving vampires equal rights.
We need the next generation to be thinkers who question
accepted beliefs and explore alternative theories.
I believe there is very real persecution (sometimes) in the USA but most of us haven't seen it... In fact, sometimes I think we tend to be the persecutors when we try to force our beliefs on others or shun others who will not
accept our beliefs.
Asking Christians to
accept your belief that certain sexual conduct is not sin is asking them to reject what God has said on the subject.
but why
accept that belief?
While we need not agree with or
accept the beliefs or values of others, as Christians it is incumbent on us to love and accept others, regardless of what they believe or do.
If you are uneducated, and have that kind of fear thrust on you, PLUS by following the word, you get the afterlife, it makes it pretty easy to see why someone would just
accept that belief.
However that may be, when he became a Christian he fully
accepted the belief of the primitive disciples that this new life was a manifestation of the Holy Spirit.
This was in direct contradiction to the Churches» generally
accepted beliefs based on a literal reading of certain books of the Bible.
In his explication of the worldview of the Dalits, Harold R. Isaac bases his interpretation on such a misconception He says, Because they [«the Ex-Untouchables»]
accepted its beliefs and sanctions, they submitted to this condition for more generations than can be remembered.
In my own ministry I have talked with a number of thoughtful people — mainly young people — who
accept belief in God as giving meaning and joy and hope to this life but reject, or are at best highly doubtful about, any concept of personal resurrection or immortality.
I don't have to
accept your belief system to celebrate these holidays, nor does any christian get to tell me not to celebrate.
I honestly don't know enough about the Catholic Church to say wether or not those are still
the accepted beliefs though.
But of course that can't be demonstrated to non-believers until
they accept the belief.
If you've never questioned your beliefs seriously, if you only
accept the beliefs of your parents as right without examining the other possibilities, if you can not articulate why you think one way as apposed to another, you've never thought independently and you maybe never will.
I consider «cult logic» to be where a certain ideology or belief claims certainty and only through
accepting that belief can one know «true» knowledge.
Your goal is to become friends with these people, even if they never
accept your beliefs about Jesus and the Bible.
@just sayin: would you want me to tell your kids that if they don't believe what I believe my all powerful god will send them to hell to be tortured forever, if you personally did not
accept my beliefs?
I will not withhold critisicm of those views and beliefs and I can not
accept belief in something for wich no evidence exists as acceptable foundation for laws.
We can therefore understand the way in which the New Testament account of Jesus» resurrection developed, but we are not likely to be able to
accept any belief in a physical resurrection.
If they don't try to force you to
accept their beliefs, then don't try to force them to accept your beliefs.
Millenarianism was never a universally
accepted belief of the Church.
They understand that I do not
accept their beliefs and they do not expect me to not eat beef.
I will not force you to
accept my beliefs as your own.
The second condition, coherence, is that the thought should be consistent with an established system of theories and generally
accepted beliefs.2 Coherence, as I take it, is consistency or fittingness with more relations and a set of consequences.
However difficult it may be for us to do so, we must exclude the question whether or not we can
accept this belief.
The thing that disappoints me about conservative Christianity is that you are often expected to
accept your beliefs as a «package deal» and you are seen as weird if you think differently on certain points.
The point from my perspective is that whether you are a believer or non-believer, trying to convince others to
accept your belief may indicate a lack of humility which means, get back to working on yourself.
Definition of HERETICAL 1: of, relating to, or characterized by heresy 2: of, relating to, or characterized by: -LRB-(departure from
accepted beliefs or standards unorthoodox)-RRB-
Many
accept the belief that Jesus is «fully God and fully man».
He was not trying to bully anyone into
accepting his belief.
Instead it is an ethical «should,» as in, «wouldn't it be morally irresponsible for me to
accept this belief?»
Catholics who can't
accept the beliefs have left the church.
A philosophical discussion of the roots of morality is one thing, but now she has
accepted a belief system that has multiple claims which are demonstrably false.