Sentences with phrase «many archeologists»

He wanted to be an archeologist because he learned how to spell the word, he says.

In the basement of Holt Renfrew's flagship location on Bloor Street in Toronto, he assesses the collection of designer footwear, handling a pair of Salvatore Ferragamo monk straps like an archeologist examining an artifact.

But now, after the five volumes that my group has published through Harvard, now these ideas are generally accepted by Assyriologists and archeologists.

It would be like laughing at an archeologist because he had the gual to suggest the pyramids were actually designed and not just some random fluke of time and matter.

@BG:» An archeologist named Meg Conkey was actually the person who discovered the Chauvet cave.

Are you an archeologist?

You don't ridicule archeologists for determings the statues on Easter Island are man made, even though there's no conclusive agreement on how they came to be there, do you?

but not taught as fact and right after science class where they learn Darwin's theory of evolution, watch videos on the big bang theory, have a field trip where they meet up with an archeologist to uncover one of our ancestors remains that weren't as evolved, learn how old the earth truely is etc.....

Plus, humans could had ridden camels alone without cargo long before using them for cargo, where a human weight alone is a much lighter load than with cargo, that it might not show load stress in previous fossils, let alone that those projected camels are only the known ones by archeologists.

I believe one of the more overwhelming testimonies regarding the depth of archeological evidence for the New Testament is in the account of the famous historian and archeologist Sir William Ramsay.

Ask any archeologist.

No archeologist or scientist has proven it wrong yet.

also as an archeologist this is not what i would consider a significant artifact, it a piece of rubble.

It is just a report on a couple of archeologists» findings.

For years, archeologists and historians said that the Bible is in error because they knew of no city named Calah.

I am very sure that morality is objective, human independent, something we uncover like archeologists not something we build like architects.»

Writes one reader about yesterday's announcement that archeologists have found the oldest known image of the apostles Andrew and John in Rome:

Archeologists tell us that in Paul's day, some of the arrows and spears had tips made of some sort of combustible material which was then lit on fire and shot or thrown into the enemy forces.

Archeologists have uncovered this site and have found many of the things we read about in this book.

In short, and not surprisingly, the World's most gifted evolutionary biologists, astronomers, cosmologists, geologists, archeologists, paleontologists, historians, modern medical researchers and linguists (and about 2,000 years of accu.mulated knowledge) are right and a handful of Iron Age Middle Eastern goat herders were wrong.

Having killed and buried African traditional religions, Christianity should have gone to celebrate and left the task of exhuming them to archeologists.

-- Two evangelical archeologists have expressed caution in evaluating reports that ancient Egyptian coins bearing the name and image of the biblical Joseph have been discovered among unsorted artifacts at the Museum of Egypt.

Thanks creationists — it's incredible how much smarter you are than the most gifted archeologists and paleontologists in the World!

Now, I will confess that I am not an archeologist, but there is a large sub-class of fossil anomalies.

Well, although I don't believe that there is any way to prove God nor do I think we will ever come particularly close even, I believe that the historical evidence in the form of copies of biblical manuscripts and the ancient towns archeologists have found that are in the Bible point to the Bible is a true authoritative book.

Correspondence, in the sense specified, is the nature of truth, the meaning of truth; yet the test of truth that we most frequently employ in connection with the past is the test of coherence: historians and archeologists have nothing available to them that is not given in the present — this book, the reliability of which must be evaluated; this artifact, the significance of which must be construed — and coherence is the final test of their theories about the past built up from the givens of the present.

There are times in the life of an archeologist or historian when such immediate feeling would give great satisfaction to the man and hence to God through his consequent nature, yet still God doesn't make it available.

There are countless stories of people (archeologists, intellectuals, etc) going out to prove the Bible wrong and they end up finding support instead.

Without the painstaking work of linguists and archeologists, the early religious history of humankind and many of its later manifestations would have remained unknown or would be inaccessible to us.

There are no unbiased archeologists who would disagree with the statements made above, and anyone trying to make the pieces fit for their own religious agenda and beliefs is a disgusting liar.

Those who say you cant use the bible because it is made up ignore the fact historians and archeologists have found artifacts going back to Genesis that support the given accounts.

Then in 1993 archeologists found proof of King David's existence outside the Bible.

archeologists... she also fails to mention that it is a book written by goatherds who didn't know why the sun came up in the morning and were this god to exist, believing in him or worshiping him would have little effect as his adherents are subject to his «will» so that our needs and desires are fulfilled at an equal rate to hoping and wishing.

In 1996, the Smithsonian Institute issued a statement addressing claims made in the Book of Mormon, stating that the text is primarily a religious text and that archeologists affiliated with the institute found «no direct connection between the archeology of the New World and the subject matter of the book».

Danish archeologists working on the island of Bahrain in «the (Persian) Gulf» have now discovered there was lively trade across the Indian Ocean, using the Monsoons, from Yemen and Oman to the Indus cultures.

Salibi demonstrated that many biblical place names fit the Hijaz region of Arabia, but not Palestine, as other archeologists have confirmed.

In addition, I have the work of literally thousands of theologians that have work since the time of Christ to explain the Bible, as well as the work of archeologists, both Christian and nonChristian, that continue to find evidence to back up the Bible.

In short, and not surprisingly, the World's most gifted evolutionary biologists, astronomers, cosmologists, geologists, archeologists, paleontologists, historians, modern medical researchers and linguists (and about 2,000 years of acc.umulated knowledge) are right and a handful of Iron Age Middle Eastern goat herders were wrong.

Archeologists have uncovered large baptismal pools where the Essenes would have undergone these ritual baptisms of separation.

Until the modern archeologist provided clay tablets, inscriptions, and artifacts, the Bible was the major historical source for important aspects of the ancient world.

Also, archeologists have found a tremendous amount of antiquities depicting humans and dinosaurs together!

Yes, all those conspiring biologists, geologists, oceanogrophers, astronomers, cosmologists, archeologists, paleontologists, horse breeders, dog breeders, oil companies, coal mining companies, horticulturists, agricultural companies and zoologists.

But we must not fool ourselves by thinking that because the archeologist proved that Solomon did have a copper smelter on the Gulf of Aqaba and a horse - trading business at Megiddo, he has thereby demonstrated that the biblical understanding of Solomon is true.

All the discoveries of the best evolutionists, geologists, archeologists, physicists etc. that search high and low large or small to date have not changed God as revealed.

(iii) you are a complete blowhard who has never studied one subject of university level biology, never been on an archeological dig, never studied a thing about paleontology, geology, astronomy, linguistics or archeology, but feel perfectly sure that you know more than the best biologists, archeologists, paleontologists, doctors, astronomers botanists and linguists in the World because your mommy and daddy taught you some comforting stories from Bronze Age Palestine as a child.

How about providing children with a real education and teach them what anthropologists, archeologists and religious historians seeking the truth have to say about where god came from:

How about you teach them what anthropologists, archeologists and religious historians seeking the truth have to say about where god came from:

There are problems with the conclusions drawn by many of the archeologists and so - called Biblical scholars.

See what anthropologists, archeologists and religious historians seeking the truth have to say about where god came from:

And even if archeologists did find some artifacts in the desert, they would not automatically as - sume it is the corroboration of the exodus, because the Jews had with them Egyptian objects.