Sentences with phrase «many false concepts»

Its an ignorant and false concept that humans are born gay.

And it's amazing how the faith based cling to the false concept that everyone uses faith in their lives.

Until we drop the false concept that scripture is somehow «holy» we have no way to ever learn to follow the Spirit of Truth which Jesus promised to send us to be our guide.

They have a false concept of evolution and know very little about how it truly works.

Atheists can not properly explain the creation story in Genesis, so they buy into the false concept of darwinism.

But it is with conversion that the «false concept of majority and minority emerged making Hinduism a religion and caste a Hindu phenomenon».

No matter what people say, no matter how hard they stomp their feet and insist THEIR god exists, and is the REAL god, (just like the billions of others before them who did the same thing), they are responding to a false concept.

First of all, it is because he believes that by making a logical blunder Aquinas has produced a false concept of God.

But I do suggest that a start in the right direction might be made in our schools and colleges Today an entirely false concept of academic freedom is turning our colleges into booby traps for young and impressionable minds.

Have we bought in to some kind of false concept of political correctness or ethic that says we must not proclaim Christ.

Aside from its implied dismissal of all the world's many riches outside the sexual domain, this false concept has placed stultifying limitations on the range of human relationships.

The goal with our store has always been to challenge that false concept, that the most beautiful objects are only for a select group of people.

On the flip side, a credit card can also serve as a teaching tool so teens do not develop a false concept of money during their journey into adulthood as there are many responsibilities that come with using a credit card.

Many false concepts have occurred due to nomenclature.

I think referring to the natural variability of data that has already been strenuously massaged to get to that one temperature point for the entire Earth as «noise» is a false concept.

As long as conservatives try to perpetuate a false concept under the false pretense that the science is a «liberal idea», they will inadvertently be excluding themselves from the much larger discussion, «how can we best address climate change?»

Especially, these zero - D box - like models introduce a false concept relative to the physical material that is to be assigned to the radiative surface that is an important part of the radiative - equilibrium concept.

Not exact matches

Keep in mind, by fraud we mean creating fake campaigns or companies, which is different from the legal concept of fraud which focuses on false representation.

But the concept of doing that at the sacrifice of the every day needs of the company - meaning, our team, that's false.

But the net - benefit test gives Canadians a false impression that the government is able to distinguish, on economic grounds, investments that will turn out well from those that won't — a concept Canadians would recognize as bizarre if applied to domestic firms.

This means I am looking at YOUR concept «God» and I reject it as being «false».

you want to draw a false dichotomy b / t the two concepts.

The idea of an «absolute antidote» suggests a different concept of the human than is presumed in Hitchens's argument: a being capable of enslavement by his darker side, one whose infinite desire for something beyond himself can be short - circuited into various «false infinities» (Ratzinger), who can redeem himself only by restoring the circuitry of his absolute relationship with his Generator.

«Every concept of God is a mere simulacrum, a false likeness, an idol: it could not reveal God himself.»

Don't idolize sports stars (I would think the most devout would understand the concept of not praying to false idols).

To me it is a sickening abomination of God's will that the most advanced nation on the face of the earth has to be held hostage to these willfully ignorant, dark - age dwelling crackpots, who turn concepts such as Capitalism into false religious idols which they expect people to worship mindlessly.

And then there was a different form of poverty: the «spiritual poverty of our time»; that poverty is most evident in wealthier societies and manifests itself in what Benedict XVI often called the «dictatorship of relativism»» the worship of the false god of me, myself, and I, imposed by state power, often in the name of a misguided and coercive concept of tolerance.

I think the concept of genetics and space would have created false idols and distracted from the One that put those things into place.

Whitehead's philosophy requires a broader conception of time, for example, one which will allow for the reality of the past in the present, a concept that the traditional metaphysician would likely judge as intuitively false, leading to the additional judgment that much of human experience is appearance rather than reality, a position which we reject, having come to a greater understanding of Whitehead's metaphysics.

Though some texts are distorted to try to prove the idea of an immortal soul, they are in fact just that, distorted to say something that they don't say because they are read with the false lens of this pagan concept.

This «infinitely perfect» characteristic must mean that the concept of «nothing» /» no - thing» is illogical and false because there can not be an opposing entity existing outside of the 1st «Cause» circle of created existence.

When they speak of the death of God they are not just referring to the God of the Greek metaphysics, or the inadequate imagery that has characterized Christian concepts to speak of God, or the false gods of pagan idolatry.

To separate Jesus from religion is to create a false dichotomy an untrue juxtaposition of two non-mutually exclusive concepts.

What I am saying is that if Michael is an observant Jeu or Muslim he should understand the concept of contributing to another's sin and recognize his argument is false.

This makes it apparent that we must have some standard for interpreting the Bible, rejecting false renderings or unworthy concepts as not being the voice of God and accepting true ones.

Now certainly, the concept of false teaching and unsound doctrine is found elsewhere in Scripture, and the term «false prophets» which is also found in 2 Peter 2:1 is also found in other passages, but the disparaging label of «false teacher» which is so frequently tossed about these days, is not a common term in Scripture.

It would seem then that the only way to purify our concepts of God of the false authoritarianism which can only sanction a suppression of our natural love of personal freedom, is to accept without reservation the image of the defenseless (but by virtue of that quality, radically powerful and creative) God who withdraws any intrusive presence and thereby opens up the future in which alone human freedom can dwell and find nourishment.

As I currently understand, you would want to understand «opinion», «defamation», and these three concepts: «a true statement» vs a «false statement», a public person (there appear to be different types), and acting with «malice».

That the materialist neo-Darwinian concept is false is the subject of Nagel's 2012 book, Mind and Cosmos.

The neoclassical theologian believes that Thomas has not only a distorted concept of God but also a false ontology.

Otherwise, we would have to cling to the a priori notion that Whitehead wrote Process and Reality from the standpoint of the concept of God developed in the last part of the book, and posit that he would have written true statements in some places in the book and false statements in others.

He knows that it's true that when a person understands certain concepts they automatically believe in them (chemistry, calculus, etc), but he thinks that it's also a false dichotomy that puts science and god belief at odds!

Saying that somebody must have certain knowledge to believe in a concept is an obvious truth that does NOT present a false dichotomy between god belief and science..

There he says, one, that the shift from the concept of «the State's role as providers of equal opportunities to every citizen» to that of providing education, health and other social services «to those who can afford to pay» is a U-turn in public policy which «has been made surreptitiously by administrative action without public discussion and legislative sanction»; two, that the total commercialization of social sectors is «alien even to free market societies»; and three, that «the ready acceptance of self - financing concept in social sectors alien even to free - market societies is the end result of gradual disenchantment with the Kerala Model of Development», which has been emphasizing the social dimension rather than the economic, but that it is quite false to present the situation as calling for a choice between social development and economic growth.

A first point seems to me to be this: to overcome [the] false idea of man's autonomy as an «I» complete in himself, whereas the «I» is fulfilled in the encounter with the «you» and «we»... It is fundamental to recover a true concept of Nature as the Creation of God that speaks to us... and also of Revelation: recognising that the book of Creation, in which God gives us our fundamental orientation, is deciphered in Revelation, which is endorsed in cultural and religious history, not without mistakes, but in a substantially valid manner, to be further developed and purified anew -LSB-... fostering] openness of the «I» to the «you», to the «we» and to the «You» of God.

There are tragic victims, cover - ups, false allegations, demands for money, denials by those who can not face up to what has happened, campaigns by those who see tolerance of paedophilia as a liberal concept and by those who seek to use every anecdote, particularly of clerical abuse, to keep the story going and smear an entire group.

Thus, in this article I do not adopt the concept of false consciousness or alienation because, besides being authoritarian, as I argued above, these concepts do not help us understand the growth of Pentecostalism and its meaning.

Women's liberation will gain general support from women only when it can be revealed as a necessity that also expresses the mandate of the woman as the foundation of the survival of the race, Male false consciousness has created an antagonistic concept of self and social and ecological relations that is rapidly destroying humankind and the earth.

I know he understands the concept as we had a couple false alarms where he only passed gas once he is on the toliet.

What is really being pushed on parents here is the arbitrary social idea and / or judgment that the earlier the infant does not need intervention the better (in some way for the infant and eventual child and adult) and this concept is inappropriately used as a weapon often by false claims suggesting that if an infant or child can not by some pre-determined age «self - soothe» it never will, or that something is either wrong with them, and is in need of repair, or that their parents are deficient (for not setting «boundaries»).