Sentences with phrase «many trademark owners»

That's why trademark owners can't run around claiming to own basic blocks of the English language.

Increasingly however trademark owners are trying to use their trademarks in ways that actually harm consumers by restricting their access to information from and about competitors.

Any use of the the term, phrase, or company name «Jolly Jumps» is not permitted unless explicit written permission has been provided by the trademark owner.

Everything located on or in this Website, including the Microsites, is the exclusive property of Orlando Stroller Rentals, LLC, Inc., is used with express permission of the copyright and / or trademark owner, and / or is used as otherwise permitted by law.

Trademarks that are located within or on the Website or a website otherwise owned or operated in conjunction with Orlando Stroller Rentals, LLC shall not be deemed to be in the public domain but rather the exclusive property of Orlando Stroller Rentals, LLC, unless such website is under license from the Trademark owner thereof in which case such license is for the exclusive benefit and use of Orlando Stroller Rentals, LLC, unless otherwise stated.

No rights are granted to use any trade marks on this Website without the trademark owner's prior written consent.

«a registered trademark owner may request that its mark not be used in the text of other parties» ads»

Trademark owners have been able to register their protected names as.

Your use of our Website does not constitute any right or license for you to use such service marks / trademarks, without the prior written permission of the corresponding service mark / trademark owner.

The Bluetooth word mark is a registered trademark owner by Bluetooth SIG, Inc., and any use of such mark by Chevrolet is under license.

However, unlike the first instance, in this case, the trademark owner appears to be aware that issues might arise and is proactively trying to limit the reach of the trademark to just the brand.

All trademarks are the property of the respective trademark owners.

None of the Vanguard ETFs are sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by any of the aforementioned trademark owners and the related index providers and their respective affiliates or their third party licensors and these entities bear no liability and make no claim, prediction, representation, warranty or condition regarding the advisability of buying, selling or holding units in the Vanguard ETFs.

Nothing in this website shall be construed as granting — by implication, estoppel or otherwise — any license or right to use any trademarks displayed on the website without the express written permission of the AKC or the trademark owner.

All other product or company names and devices, logos, icons, graphics or designs referred to on the pages of this Website are the trademarks of their respective owners and are exhibited only in such a manner as is intended to be for the benefit of such trademark owners and The Travel Blogs intends no infringement of such trademarks.

While some courts have determined that a trademark owner need not necessarily prosecute every infringing third - party use of its mark, such third - party uses can still affect the distinctiveness of the mark in the mind of the public

Trademark rights may also be lost when a trademark owner fails effectively to police its mark against eroded distinctiveness, which may occur as a result of the presence of confusingly similar third - party marks in the market.

These trademark owners, and the manufacturers of the weapons, vehicles and other equipment used in the game, are not affiliated with the producer of ARMA 2 and do not endorse or sponsor the game.

You acknowledge and agree that nothing on the Website grants any right or license to use any of the Trademarks or may be construed to mean that we have authority to grant any right or license on behalf of any third party trademark owner.

Prior jurisprudence holds that the rights granted to the owners of such «official marks» are distinct from the usual rights granted to trademark owners, and depend on whether the mark used by the defendant is «likely to be mistaken for» the official mark, as opposed to the passing - off analysis which depends on whether or not there is a «likelihood of confusion» and involves a consideration of the goods and services, channels of trade and public recognition of the respective marks involved.

Patent and trademark owners who file applications, pay maintenance fees and renew trademark registrations before then will pay current (read: lower) fees.

Hopefully this decision will be limited to its specific facts and given a narrow interpretation, both with respect to its application to official marks and passing - off, as otherwise it potentially has broad reaching implications which would significantly affect not only official mark owners but also general trademark owners in the context of domain names and trademark use on the Internet, where initial confusion may be rampant but easily remedied by «research» in the form of a click of the mouse.»

When another company inappropriately uses a trademark for their purposes, the trademark owner can sue that company and make them stop using it.

Many of these marijuana brands have caught the attention of the trademark owners of these famous brands.

When someone sells lesser - quality goods without permission, it can damage the trademark owner's reputation.

Read on if you're weighing the pros and cons of registering your trademark, however; since registration does provide additional legal protections for trademark owners.

The «wrinkle» with this is that the trademark owner must pay the USPTO a $ 375 «application fee» to even start the registration process.

Although registration is free, access is limited to trademark professionals and trademark owners.

Trademark owners can also apply to have their trademarks placed on an official registry kept by the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO).

However, the exclusivity that a trademark gives the trademark owner is limited to the industry that the trademark is registered to.

You can ask the trademark owner for permission, which you might get if you pay them money.

Similarly, a district court may be called upon to decide these same issues when a trademark owner sues in federal court for trademark infringement.

A trademark owner can lose a trademark if it enters common use and becomes generalized.

Foreign trademark owners frustrated with the limited ability to protect famous marks in Canada may wish to review carefully the detailed assessment of the depreciation of goodwill claim.

However, if the goods are being imported from a country where the goods are not trademarked, then the trademark owner may be able to block this illegal importation of goods.

In the United States, a trademark owner is not able to block what's known as «parallel imports» — when someone imports goods without the consent of the trademark owner in that country.

Since many trademarks rely on words commonly used in everyday language, a trademark owner can not enforce his rights if his trademark is legitimately used in a different context.

A registered trademark can protect a trademark owner from later becoming disentitled of the trademark due to the adoption of a confusing official mark;

The review recognized Huston as «remarkable» and a go - to for prestigious trademark owners.

Since your app is intending to be associated with the trademark owner's institution, you would not be infringing a trademark.

On February 3, 2014 Corporate Counsel quoted Catherine M.C. Farelly on how the United States» recent ease of trade restrictions on Cuba affects U.S. trademark owners.

Many trademark owners were discouraged by the fact that the court practice in various jurisdictions varied and led to unexpected results.

In Nigeria, the registered trademark owner is the legal owner of the trademark and has superiority over any other right.

The purpose of such a statement is to disavow the reading of any impression that the person making the statement is affiliated with the trademark owner, because the gravamen of a trademark infringement suit is that the person using the trademark mislead a consumer into thinking that the person using the trademark was endorsed by or affiliated with the trademark owner.

«disavow the reading of any impression that the person making the statement is affiliated with the trademark owner,» How does it do that?

The trademark owner must also undertake to compensate the alleged infringer in the event that the case is ultimately dismissed.

A trademark owner must prove three things on a motion for an interlocutory injunction: (i) that its allegations raise a «serious issue» of infringement; (ii) that the harm caused by the infringement if it continues until trial would be «irreparable»; and (iii) that the balance of convenience favours granting an interlocutory injunction e.g. awarding an injunction would not cause any undue inconvenience to the alleged infringer.

Stay current on changes that may affect copyright and trademark owners, including new gTLDs, legislation, litigation, and policies.

We represent both domain name registrants and trademark owners in connection with Domain Name Disputes.

After all, a trademark owner undertakes considerable costs in developing a mark, advertising and promoting it so that the mark has commercial success for the goods and / or services with which it is used.