Marxist liberation theology would have us find liberation theology in antiquity.
Marxist Liberation theology is popular among Catholics in poor nations and especially in Latin America where the Pope comes from.
Not exact matches
It is a matter of personal confession that Whitehead's metaphysics, via process
theology, the
Marxist analysis of capitalism, via Latin American social analysis, and Biblical study, via the
theology of
liberation, have jointly served to flesh out a vision of reality in which the divine call to socialist revolution has been confirmed and rendered fully compelling.
One may justly suspect that the fascination of some espousers of
liberation theology for
Marxist analysis may also conceal a tendency to ideology that unfortunately vitiates efforts to unmask competing capitalist ideology.
He claims there has been «a movement away from
Marxist reductionism to communitarian participatory radicalism in the development of
liberation theology over the past twenty years.»
The first phase of «
Marxist reductionism» and «mindless revolutionism» was followed by a second phase wherein
liberation theology became oriented to the kind of grass - roots democratic populism embodied in the Christian base - communities.
Generalization is dangerous here too, but it is safe to say that
liberation theology is characterized by an emphasis on the experience of oppression and a
Marxist - inspired social analysis that divides society into oppressor and oppressed.
J. Emmette Weir, for example, has cited Juan Luis Segundo's criticism of the social ineffectiveness of the
Marxist concept of religion («The Bible and Marx», Scottish Journal of
Theology, August 1982) and has also noted that current exponents of liberation theology have shifted away from dependence on Marx -(«Liberation Theology Comes of Age,» Expository Times, Octobe
Theology, August 1982) and has also noted that current exponents of
liberation theology have shifted away from dependence on Marx -(«Liberation Theology Comes of Age,» Expository Times, Octo
liberation theology have shifted away from dependence on Marx -(«Liberation Theology Comes of Age,» Expository Times, Octobe
theology have shifted away from dependence on Marx -(«
Liberation Theology Comes of Age,» Expository Times, Octo
Liberation Theology Comes of Age,» Expository Times, Octobe
Theology Comes of Age,» Expository Times, October 1986).
Today, Weigel argues that the same impulse fuels
Marxist totalitarianism and the sacralization of politics of «
theologies of
liberation.»
In the question - answer session that followed the lecture, Pannenberg called on Christian theologians to follow the lead of the early church fathers and offer a more creative approach to the task of doing
theology in the face of the world's injustices than that found in
Marxist - oriented
liberation theologies.
By analyzing the
Marxist system, he offered the philosophical basis for his cautionary stance toward
liberation theology - a position prefigured in his discussion of alienation in Anthropology in 7heological Perspective (Westminster, 1985).
His willingness to speak against this movement has not endeared him to some members of the American theological community, who have become increasingly supportive of
liberation theology and increasingly willing to use
Marxist categories in criticizing social structures.
That is praxiology
theology, a
Marxist perspective (
liberation theology in S. America).
Liberation theology to a large extent agrees with
Marxist analysis in its identification with the oppressed in the struggle against the oppressor.
Philosophically,
liberation theologies are sometimes portrayed as more or less naive popular movements drawing upon now outdated 19th century notions of divergent vintages:
Marxist (Third World), social gospel (First World), suffragette (Feminist), black nationalism (Black), agrarian pastoralism (Environmentalist), or romantic pacifism (Nuclear Pacifist).
Even in his 1979 speech repudiating the
Marxist political - theological matrix of
liberation theology, Pope John Paul II reminded the bishops of Latin America that «internal and international peace will be assured only when a social and economic system based on justice takes effect».
Castro for his part clearly recognized the political gain in an alliance between
liberation theology and
Marxist revolution: «From a strictly political point of view» and I think I know something about politics» I believe that it is possible for Christians to be
Marxists as well, and to work with
Marxist Communists to transform the world.»
More generally, the loss of prestige suffered by international socialism after Tiananmen Square, and even more after the «velvet revolution» against socialist oppression in Eastern Europe, brought the «
Marxist analysis» on which
liberation theology so heavily depended into universal disrepute.
The focus of the discussion was the use of social sciences in
theology, the rereading of the Bible from the perspective of the poor, the Christian communities in the struggle of
liberation and the assumption of some elements of critical and
Marxist analysis for a better and deeper understanding of the conflictual reality of the continent.
Liberation theology, by contrast, was about «praxis»» the
Marxist term for the revolutionary project of removing the oppression of the poor.
The fight - back led by Blessed John Paul II and Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger against the doctrinal heresies and
Marxist analysis underlying
liberation theology had only just begun...
Further, Gutiérrez implies — notably in his A
Theology of
Liberation (Orbis, 1973)-- that Christians legitimately can and indeed should participate with
Marxists in the violence of social change in order to liberate Latin America.
Not surprising from someone who grew up with and endorsed the
Marxist - inspired
liberation theology of Latin American.