Measure student learning rather than time.
Not exact matches
Teachers should be rewarded for producing useful
student outcomes, most notably,
student learning gains,
measured by value - added standards (i.e., improvement)
rather than by levels of achievement at the end of a course.
Removing seat time from state regulations certainly stands to open up more opportunities for
students to move at their own pace, and for educators to
measure progress in terms of authentic
learning rather than hours and minutes.
So
rather than just use other
measures to evaluate those teachers — like observations — states encouraged the creation of «
student learning objectives» to fill the gap.
«Extensive research shows that... valid and reliable
measures of teacher effectiveness,» have yet to be generated, she says, blithely putting on ignore important work by Thomas Kane, Eric Hanushek, and Raj Chetty and his colleagues, which shows that
students learn in any given year somewhere between 10 and 20 percent of a standard deviation more if they have an especially effective teacher
rather than a very ineffective one.
Rather than
measuring how well
students have
learned a specific curriculum, PISA examines their ability to apply their
learning.
However, it stresses these need to be integrated into the whole - school ethos and
student learning activities,
rather than a superficial
measure.
With $ 360 million in additional Race to the Top money, it is backing work by states to design new testing systems that it says will
measure student growth —
rather than capture a snapshot of achievement — supply real - time feedback to teachers to guide instruction, and include performance - based items to gauge more types of
learning.
Rather than maintaining a system that uses narrow
measures of
student achievement to sanction poorly performing schools, the push is now to implement next - generation
learning goals that encourage higher - order thinking skills.
Standardized tests like the
Student Assessment of Growth and Excellence (SAGE) are ill equipped to
measure students» knowledge, talent, and skills and often take a «snapshot» of
students rather than
measure learning over time.
How would assessment following these guidelines promote
learning for a wide range of
students rather than simply
measuring it?
«Multimetric accountability systems should use formative assessments, evidence of
student learning, and progress toward personal growth objectives to
measure student and teacher success
rather than rely on standardized test scores as the primary reference point.»
Rather than
measuring learning, they
measure students» socio - economic and racial backgrounds, much like the eugenicist IQ tests of the past.