This judgment contains a thorough discussion of Combined Air
Mechanical Services v. Flesch in the context of a legal malpractice claim arising from the defendant lawyer's alleged negligence in prosecuting medical malpractice litigation.
In 121897 Ontario Limited o / a Castle Auto Collision &
Mechanical Service v. Certas Insurance, a vehicle insured by Certas was damaged in an accident and towed to a repair facility.
Not exact matches
The decision replaces the previous decision by the Ontario Court of Appeal in Combined Air
Mechanical Services Inc.
v. Flesch, a special five - judge panel to hear five appeals over Rule 20 which then created a «full appreciation test» for summary judgment motions.
Combined Air
Mechanical Services Inc.
v. Flesch 2011 ONCA 764 — for the second week in a row.
In doing so, the Court returned to the test of when a mini-trial is appropriate originally set out in Combined Air
Mechanical Services Inc.
v. Flesch, 2011 ONCA 764: