Sentences with phrase «melting point other»

Melting point Other research points to the railway itself as a contributing factor.

Not exact matches

The point is to use any combination of 2 semi-soft melting cheeses like Manchego, Mozarella, Fontina, Havarti, Monterey Jack, or others, as well as a creamy cheese like goat cheese.

Conscious chocolate does have a lower melting point than other chocolate due to the coconut butter and because we do not use any emulsifiers.

Other toppings should be reserved for later, including melted butter which can burn due to its low smoke point.

1) Pre-heat oven to 300 deg Fahrenheit (150 deg cel) 2) Line one large baking sheet (0r two medium baking sheets) with parchment paper 3) In a large bowl, combine the oats, chia seeds, flax seeds, raisins, almonds and other nuts, and mix well 4) In a smaller bowl, whisk together the honey, light brown sugar, melted butter and cinnamon until smooth and sugar has dissolved 5) Pour the honey mixture over the dry ingredients and stir well until you get a homogeneous mixture 6) Pour the mixture over the baking sheets and spread evenly with a spatula, then season lightly with sea salt 7) Bake for 15 minutes, then stir the granola gently (to make sure all sides are cooked) 8) At this point, you may need to switch the baking sheets (if you are using 2) so the granola cooks evenly 9) Bake for another 15 minutes, then stir again, before cooking for a final 15 minutes or until golden brown 10) Remove granola from the oven and place on cooking racks until completely cool and crisp 11) Store granola in air - tight containers at room temperature.

It made sense to start with antimony because it has a much lower melting point — just 631 degrees Celsius — compared to copper's 1,085 C. Though the higher melting temperatures of other metals add complication to designing an overall production system, the underlying physical principles are the same, and so such systems should eventually be feasible, he says.

Tantalum It is a soft, grayish - blue metal with a melting point of 5,463 degrees Fahrenheit (higher than all but two other elements) and, more important, an exceptional ability to store electric charge.

The glass of drinking glasses, window glass, and other household items (i.e., decorative picture frames, lampshade glass) not only contains additives and chemicals that have a different melting point than glass bottles and jars, but it is very likely to break when placed in the blue bin and transported, so it is not recyclable.

What's left when the highly saturated lauric acid (and potentially a few other highly saturated fatty acids too depending on the manufacturer) with a melting point of 110F / 43C is removed from coconut oil?

When lauric acid and other high melting point saturated fats are removed from coconut oil, the resulting liquid coconut oil is not ideal for cooking.

So what is left after lauric acid and some of the other saturated fats with higher melting points are removed from real coconut oil?

The other fatty acids with higher melting points found in coconut oil are oleic and linoleic fatty acids.

If it is simply a «left over» oil after extracting lauric acid and also removing the other high melting point saturated fats, then it is a combination of MCTs and unsaturated fatty acids that is probably approximately two thirds MCTs and one third unsaturated fatty acids consisting of monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids.

Note smoothness, grittiness, melting - point and the thousands of other textural dimensions.

: Unlike most other oils, coconut oil has a high melting point — about 24 to 25 degress Celsius or 76 - 78 Fahrenheit.

That said, one of the main points of concern that I've seen in other thread regarding increasing lamp brightness, is the melting of conductors (wires) and light socket / boot.

While some are fully colored and others in value tones, the pictures have come to represent Shemesh's «interest in compression and expansion of space, shifting points of view, and in the current work, the dissolution of form, as the figure melts into its refraction,» the gallery writes.

-- Climate impacts: global temperatures, ice cap melting, ocean currents, ENSO, volcanic impacts, tipping points, severe weather events — Environment impacts: ecosystem changes, disease vectors, coastal flooding, marine ecosystem, agricultural system — Government actions: US political views, world - wide political views, carbon tax / cap - and - trade restrictions, state and city efforts — Reducing GHGs: + electric power systems: fossil fuel use, conservation, solar, wind, geothermal, nuclear, tidal, other + transportation sector: conservation, mass transit, high speed rail, air travel, auto / truck (mileage issues, PHEVs, EVs, biofuels, hydrogen) + architectural structure design: home / office energy use, home / office conservation, passive solar, other

The other point is that there are so few unrestricted outlets for the ice sheet, that it has to melt in place for the most part, which is a much slower process than losing volume via calving.

You also pointed to melting ice in the northern hemisphere, but failed to mention the other half of the planet and the fact that antarctic ice is growing at present, not shrinking.

While recent headlines about the woes of U.N. - led efforts to assemble a comprehensive picture of the science have caused gleeful headlines on The Drudge Report and other skeptical media outlets, the vast weight of the evidence — from melting glaciers to warming oceans to satellite temperature readings, and much more — still points to a changing climate caused by human activity.

There is nothing in all the forcings with a set point, other than the temperature that Arctic Sea Ice Melts and Freezes.

There's still glacial melt, sea level rise, top of atmosphere spectral changes, ocean acidification, expanding growing seasons, CO2 physics, atmospheric CO2 increase in isotopes attributable to fossil fuels, lots of other things that seem to point to global warming.

the melting ice is due to the warmer gulfstream, which collected warmth from the warming period which ended at ca. 2000 Climate on Earth is ruled, among others, by the Gleissberg solar / weather cycle http://blogs.24.com/henryp/2012/10/02/best-sine-wave-fit-for-the-drop-in-global-maximum-temperatures/ Those still pointing to melting ice and glaciers, as «proof» that it is (still) warming, and not cooling, should remember that there is a lag from energy - in and energy - out due to oceans acting as energy reservoirs..

One of the biggest selling points of the anthropogenic global warming theory is the incorrect assertion that glaciers are melting, which will supposedly contribute to catastrophic rises in sea level and the endangerment of polar bears, among other things — and the media are all too eager to pass on this inaccurate view of climate to the public.

Jim D, if you and others like you aren't willing to do what must be done to greatly increase the price of carbon, then all your talk of ice sheet melting, sea level rise, climate tipping points, global temperature trends, the earth's paleoclimate history, and climate model projections — all of that talk is mere Kabuke theater.

RealClimate is wonderful, and an excellent source of reliable information.As I've said before, methane is an extremely dangerous component to global warming.Comment # 20 is correct.There is a sharp melting point to frozen methane.A huge increase in the release of methane could happen within the next 50 years.At what point in the Earth's temperature rise and the rise of co2 would a huge methane melt occur?No one has answered that definitive issue.If I ask you all at what point would huge amounts of extra methane start melting, i.e at what temperature rise of the ocean near the Artic methane ice deposits would the methane melt, or at what point in the rise of co2 concentrations in the atmosphere would the methane melt, I believe that no one could currently tell me the actual answer as to where the sharp melting point exists.Of course, once that tipping point has been reached, and billions of tons of methane outgass from what had been locked stores of methane, locked away for an eternity, it is exactly the same as the burning of stored fossil fuels which have been stored for an eternity as well.And even though methane does not have as long a life as co2, while it is around in the air it can cause other tipping points, i.e. permafrost melting, to arrive much sooner.I will reiterate what I've said before on this and other sites.Methane is a hugely underreported, underestimated risk.How about RealClimate attempts to model exactly what would happen to other tipping points, such as the melting permafrost, if indeed a huge increase in the melting of the methal hydrate ice WERE to occur within the next 50 years.My amateur guess is that the huge, albeit temporary, increase in methane over even three or four decades might push other relevent tipping points to arrive much, much, sooner than they normally would, thereby vastly incresing negative feedback mechanisms.We KNOW that quick, huge, changes occured in the Earth's climate in the past.See other relevent posts in the past from Realclimate.Climate often does not change slowly, but undergoes huge, quick, changes periodically, due to negative feedbacks accumulating, and tipping the climate to a quick change.Why should the danger from huge potential methane releases be vievwed with any less trepidation?