N'Zonzi may well prove to be a shrewd buy, although Wenger wouldn't usually sanction a # 36.5
Million fee for a player who turns 29 in only a few months.
Not exact matches
And its not like Wenger bought such poor
players by choice, thats what his money could afford him, think about it... not long ago, a mere 16
million euros that was used in the acquisition of carzola was our record transfer
fee when other teams bought
players for fees in excess of 30 mil every season!
# 30
Million is not an amount to completely dismiss
for a
player who has only started 33 Premier League matches since joining in 2014
for a supposed # 16
Million fee.
who would of guest City would make an offer of 60
million in the summer
for Sanchez with only a year left on his contract, i'm guessing we could get an offer of around 30
million from City in January so he wont be persuaded by the likes of PSG with a signing on
fee in the summer, but who knows what goes in the mind of Alexis or what kind of injuries some big clubs could have from now until January
for them to make ridiculous offers to a world class
player with no CL conflict of interest, lets say Real Madrid loses Ronaldo, Bale, Karim to long term injury you bet they will come ceiling with baring gifts
for Sanchez's services or even Barca with Messi or Suarez
Although he commanded a
fee over # 20
million, he has since made that
fee look minimal, as he controls the midfield
for Chelsea, becoming the
player that Arsenal fans envy.
Rodgers is keen to secure Eriksen
for a reduced
fee after the Liverpool hierarchy told him he would be given just # 20
million to spend on new
players this summer.
The Echo understand that Inter Milan are also keen on the forward, with a
fee of $ 14
million having been mooted
for the
player.
10/11 season spend was around # 20
million, # 11.25 was highest
fee for player paid.
His expected
fee will likely be around the 15
million pound mark, which seems too high
for a
player who is getting older and was not in good form last season.
The arrivals of Alexis Sanchez and Mesut Ozil
for fees in excess of # 35
Million each, shows the club are now willing to spend if the right
player becomes available, and as of yet, none of them have shown an inkling to leave.
I know
players need to get a chance but as an example even tho it would be a laugh
for most other fans what if Falcao got injured and utd missed him half a season on 300k plus a week and the 6
million fee the fans would miss out and the cost is too much.
He clearly didn't refuse to play
for the BVB, nor did he appear to lower his workrate
for them, so they can hardly complain, but that hasn't stopped former team - mate Gundogan
for talking out on the subject, another
player who coincidentally made his intention to leave the club public before leaving to join Man City
for a mediocre # 20
Million fee.
Although with that being said granted that he is a premier league
player we would have to adjust
for inflation, so he will definitely command a transfer
fee exceeding # 45
Million however from our perspective with us looking to offload a few of our
players, who retrospectively are being looked at by Everton Ospina, Walcott, Gibbs, Ox and Campbell it would provide us with the perfect opportunity to launch a bid upwards of # 40
Million and a
player exchange I may be getting ahead of myself but f we were to get rid of any of those guys I'd rather it be in a deal to a team, that couldn't provide a threat to our title ambitions whilst it simultaneously being a deal that advantages all parties.
Good enough that VfL Wolfsburg paid $ 20
million to sign him last summer, the highest transfer
fee ever paid
for an American
player.
Arsenal had been negotiating with Basel
for the last 8 months
for Elneny and his transfer
fee is said to be more than the reported
fee (# 7
million) the true cost is kept between the two clubs so that Basel don't get held to ransom when they enter the swiss market to buy
players.
The France international became one of the most expensive
players in history when he moved from Borussia Dortmund to Barca in the summer
for what BBC Sport reported at the time as a # 135.5
million fee.
So I don't know if you are aware of it or not but, according to various sources in the news Mesut Ozil, is the prime target
for Juventus this transfer window... It seems so strange, this is the first time in a while our main
players have been subject to transfer rumours and we haven't even deemed them as a credible threat... anyway the
fee currently being proposed is around # 31.5
Million pounds which would mean a 11 million loss on our original inve
Million pounds which would mean a 11
million loss on our original inve
million loss on our original investment.
Mets owner Joan Payson had spent a trifling $ 50,000 as a
fee for the franchise, a mere $ 1.8
million in payments to other clubs
for players in the expansion draft, and all of $ 600,000 in salaries to field her team.
# 15
million may seem like a lot
for a
player of Szczesny's calibre and especially
for a goalkeeper, however let's not forget some of the crazy prices that are flying around the transfer market nowadays and so demanding such a
fee isn't entirely unrealistic from Arsenal.
Pogba isn't worth # 89
million but he is a good
player too Strangely, the Transfer
fee for both Mkitharyan and Ibrahimovic was # 26
million (# 26 mil plus # 0).
Both
players seem unhappy at their current clubs and would probably command a similar transfer
fee of at least # 40
million plus, but who would you go
for?
8
million in transfer
fee and around 40,000 per week in wages is not a gamble in my opinion
for a
player who possesses world class potential.
Liverpool have already had one offer
for the
player rejected, but while the Ukrainian heavyweights were not willing to entertain the Reds» # 24.6
million bid, they are understood to be willing to sell the
player for a # 37.6
million fee.
The club has debts running into the countless
millions and the likes of Tottenham and Watford still awaiting
fees for players purchased by the cash strapped club.
With suggests of a release clause worth as little as # 6
million, the
fee required to bring the former St. Etienne forward to the Premier League could well be a snip
for a
player who scored 13 Bundesliga goals last season.
Liverpool look to be on the verge of finally securing a deal
for Alberto Moreno, with the Daily Mail reporting that the Reds have agreed a
fee with Sevilla of around # 16
million for the
player's services.
Arsenal can not assume he's not our
player because he's worth roughly 60
million plus the 25
million you want to pay him
for sign on
fee, that's about 85
million plus astronomical wages.
Can you honestly argue that our consecutive FA cup wins had nothing to do with the two
players we've acquired
for a combined
fee of almost 80
million?
# 15
Million for a
player with only one year on his deal poses at a more than reasonable
fee, but it does seem a shame to lose him as he is finally showing his ability.
«Calamity» Clichy was a terrible and mistake ridden LB and I laughed my socks off when MAN City gave us a huge
fee of # 7
million for a
player I thought worth about fourpence.
keep Sanchez (unless we get huge
fee from outside epl) sell a few foreign
players + one or two English to generate what we paid
for Lacazette and what with 150
million mentioned war chest get two WC
players one being replacement
for Santi Cazorla and much missed Thomas Rosicky
today bild the number one newspaper in germany published the details of the deal
for the
player,
fee: 42
millions euros, the
player get a 8
millions signing on bonus, contract to run until 2020, wages: 240,000 / week or 12,5
millions a year, the total value of the deal before bonuses exactly 100
millions!!
With Arsenal supposedly readying a # 30
Million offer
for Sturridge, Liverpool will have to consider the striker's worth to their team, and that sort of
fee could appear generous
for a
player who is regularly on the sidelines.
To be fair to Arsene Wenger and the Arsenal board, a transfer
fee of # 10
million does not sound like too much to ask
for a
player with the pace and technical ability that Kieran Gibbs has and the experience that being an England international with nearly 150 Premier League games and close to 50 in the Champions League brings with it.
However, the report in The Sun suggesting that it was the Lyon forward Alexandre Lacazette that Wenger and Gazidis were in France
for seems a lot more believable, with the transfer
fee for this
player said to be more like # 50
million.
The price tag placed on the
player was most likely a bit off putting
for the Gunners, with a rumoured
fee of around # 50
million and such was the case that he ended up returning to Madrid in a cut - price deal.
It's obvious that he effectively has nowhere else to go.His wages alone preclude any interest from another Club.Factor in a transfer
fee and uninspiring form and Arsenal are alone in a desire to have him.Wenger can't bear the thought of a
player who originally cost over 40
million pounds having no sell - on value.However this is a fact.Extend Ozil's contract
for another wasteful two years paying him a wage he doesn't deserve and he'll be off to Turkey once he feels that he's banked enough # 300k weekly wage packets.Any way you look at it Arsenal won't get their money's worth!As unappetising as it might be Arsenal should play «hard - ball» and just let him see out the remainder of his contract.
The # 5
Million fee however seems rather low
for a first - team
player of a club chasing the European qualification places at present.
These
players had the same kind of stats
for themselves and their transfer
fees were around # 20
million.
Dortmund want Big Bucks
for all their
player's and from I heard Bayern Munich are prepared to pay the # 30
million for Hummels and even if Wenger WAS to stump up that kind of
fee, we all know where this
player would choose to go!
Signed from Rennes
for just # 12.75
million in 2016, the $ 105
million fee, potentially rising to as much as $ 140
million, represented a tremendous return on their investment, but BVB were losing a
player who had shone in the previous season, becoming the creative fulcrum of the side with 21 assists.
Previously pursued by Cagliari and Chievo Verona, former Hellas
player is currently on a deal with Azzurri until June 2021, and might be put up
for sale on an about 3.5
million euros
fee.
Blackpool are demanding # 6
million pounds
for the
player, but with Liverpool being owed 35 % of any transfer
fee as part of the deal that took Ince from Liverpool to Blackpool, the Anfield club are only willing to part with # 4
million.
In the January transfer window, the Reds were once again linked with a big - money move
for the speedster but Virgil van Dijk was the only
player to sign
for Liverpool, with his # 75
million move a world record
fee for a defender.
The
fee is reported to be in the region of $ 15
million for 50 % of the Spaniard's rights with Jorge Mendes owning a further 20 % of the
player.
So, if a club signs a
player for # 40
million this summer and he signs a five - year deal, that
player's transfer
fee will be recorded as an # 8
million expenditure in each of the next five seasons, rather than # 40
million this season.
The writer is sure that the referral will ultimately fizzle out; yes it is true that Chelsea were willing to pay a # 35
million transfer
fee in August 2017 but paid only # 15
million in this January window (with unsubstantiated reports suggesting that the
player's agency was paid # 7
million for their role in this slightly odd saga) and it is true that in any normal business — where an asset depreciated at a rate of # 1
million per week before it was sold — eyebrows would be raised.
Even after having spent a significant amount of cash in highly - rated
players such as Mesut Ozil and more recently, Alexandre Lacazette who was signed
for a
fee of # 47
million.
The most expensive signing Middlesbrough made last season, he cost the club a whopping 12
million pounds, which is a huge
fee for such a
player at such a club.
The loan
fee may increase
for a maximum $ 0.2
million on the
player achieving given performances within 30 June 2018.