Still confused, you check the ABA
Model Rules commentary: «The advocate has a duty to use legal procedure for the fullest benefit of the client's cause, but also a duty not to abuse legal procedure.»
Not exact matches
Not every lawyer sees the issue in such a negative light, in part due to the ABA's own
commentary on the
Model Rules.
Formal Opinion 480 explains that lawyers communicating about legal topics in public
commentary must comply with the ABA
Model Rules of Professional Conduct, including
Rule 1.6 (a) which says: «A lawyer shall not reveal information relating to the representation of a client unless the client gives informed consent, the disclosure is impliedly authorized in order to carry out the representation, or the disclosure is permitted by paragraph (b).»
(Here is the draft version of the
model rule; the
commentary was revised during the ABA debate to leave it to states to decide whether to make public the conditional nature of the admission.)
[4] Federation of Law Societies of Canada,
Model Code of Professional Conduct, Chapter 5,
Rule 5.1 - 5 and
Commentary.
Here, the Federation of Law Societies of Canada is now consulting on a change to its
Model Code which would see the
commentary to the general
rule on lawyer competence amended to add the following statement:
Ever since the American Bar Association modified «Competence»
Model Rule 1.1, comment 8 in 2012 requiring lawyers to «keep abreast of changes in the law and its practice, including the benefits and risks associated with relevant technology,» legal technology focused articles and
commentary have flourished (just see #legaltech).