Not exact matches
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration gave a perfect five - star crash rating on the Tesla
Model X after the electric SUV was
subjected to a series of crash
tests.
It is customary and even ethically mandatory that experimentation that carries with it a substantial degree of risk to human
subjects first be
tested in an animal laboratory or, at the very least, on a computer
model.
Barring this one logically inappropriate means of
testing the reliability of
models, the metaphors of religion lie open to evaluation along very similar lines to the
models used in the sciences to represent a
subject matter that lies beyond our powers of direct inspection.
To
test this
model, we used high - resolution functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine brain activity in 14 healthy
subjects while they performed an active «escape - pain» task within a two - dimensional maze.
When they
tested the savvy
model on the remaining 10 percent of
subjects, it successfully predicted the financial means of those users.
Using multivariate
models, we
tested associations between eNOS htSNPs and diabetes (n = 461 and 474 case and control
subjects, respectively) and glucose intolerance (two cohorts of n = 706 and 738 U.K. and Spanish Caucasians, respectively), and we
tested eNOS x total energy expenditure interactions on glucose intolerance.
We also applied a computational
model to describe task behavior and
test subjects» latent representations of ingredients in recipe space.
Climate
models are being
subjected to more comprehensive
tests, including, for example, evaluations of forecasts on time scales from days to a year.
And he was able to poke, prod and measure countless
test subjects — including fitness
models and athletes.
In addition to
modeling lessons for teachers and working with small groups of students, the skills specialists also regularly analyze student scores on diagnostic, formative, and standardized
tests across classrooms,
subjects, and grades.
But not for all the usual reasons that people raise concerns: the worry about whether we've got good measures of teacher performance, especially for instructors in
subjects other than reading and math; the likelihood that tying achievement to evaluations will spur teaching to the
test in ways that warp instruction and curriculum; the futility of trying to «principal - proof» our schools by forcing formulaic, one - size - fits - all evaluation
models upon all K — 12 campuses; the terrible timing of introducing new evaluation systems at the same time that educators are working to implement the Common Core.
«Success» in implementing standards - based reforms under this
model is defined not in terms of
test scores in a limited number of
subject areas, but broadly, in terms of providing all students a sound basic education on a sustained basis.
So you will see that by early next year [2012] we have to deliver on the first
model, which is [teacher evaluations in] the
tested subjects.
This is why, in our
modeling efforts, we do massive multivariate, longitudinal analyses in order to exploit the covariance structure of student data over grades and
subjects to dampen the errors of measurement in individual student
test scores.
The policy requires that at least 40 percent of teachers» evaluation be based on a value - added
model (VAM)-- a
model that comprises a bewildering formula that incorporates
test data from students they do not teach or from
subjects they do not teach.
When I listen to some charter network leaders talk about their
models, they often openly state that they spend disproportionate amounts of the school day on
tested subjects (English and math).
The law encourages local districts to submit teacher pay proposals for the pilot that could look like one of two distinct
models: either pitch a plan that would reward teachers on the basis of how well their students do on
tests, or present an idea for paying teachers who work in hard to staff
subject areas or rural / high poverty schools and / or taking on additional leadership roles to improve student success.
Gordon Lafer, in an in - depth report this year for the Economic Policy Institute (EPI), notes that Rocketship's educational
model rests on four strategies: «the replacement of teachers with computers for a significant portion of the day; a reliance on young and inexperienced teachers for the rest of the day; narrowing the curriculum to math and reading with little attention to other
subjects; and even within these
subjects, a relentless focus on preparing students for standardized
tests.»
• The «blended learning»
model of education exemplified by the Rocketship chain of charter schools — often promoted by charter boosters — is predicated on paying minimal attention to anything but math and literacy, and even those
subjects are taught by inexperienced teachers carrying out data - driven lesson plans relentlessly focused on
test preparation.
The availability of
test scores in multiple
subjects for each student permits us to estimate a
model with student fixed effects, which helps minimize any bias associated with the non-random distribution of teachers and students among classrooms within schools.
The «layered
model,» as it is called by researchers, collects between three and five years of
test - score data for each student in as many
subjects as possible, including reading, math, science and social studies, in order to make predictions about how a student will score on a given
test.
Of the 12
models subjected to this
test so far, two scored Good, four scored Acceptable, three scored Marginal and three scored Poor.
With its compact size and concept - car looks the Evoque is clearly a new kind of Range Rover, but it has been
subjected to exactly the same punishing
test and development regime as the larger Range Rover
models.
But some variants in the
model range were
subject to a three - star safety rating for safety, according to local crash
test authority ANCAP, taking some of the shine off the new car's launch.
The Crossfire debuted as a 2004
model, and for 2005, there are already some changes: There is a convertible
model, a higher - powered, 330 - horsepower SRT
model and a Limited
model, which is the
subject of this
test.
Performance
Tested to the Limit In recognition of the extreme performance potential of the Focus RS500, the limited edition
model has been
subjected to a series of concentrated durability
tests which have focused on the car's track capabilities.
Our
test subject is a rear - wheel drive Luxury
model, which is the second trim level in the ATS hierarchy.
The
test subject were all small cars — specifically, 2014
models of the Chevrolet Volt, Ford C - MAX Hybrid, Fiat 500 L, Hyundai Veloster, Mazda5, MINI Cooper Countryman, Mitsubishi Lancer, Nissan Juke, Nissan Leaf, Scion FR - S, Scion xB, and Subaru BRZ.
After
subjecting the phone to a number of
tests, we learned that the OS build that is preloaded on the device is less prone to errors and glitches than the previous BlackBerry
models.
To get a sense for how the
model performs with actual gameplay, we
subjected it to thorough
testing in GTA V, Batman: Arkham Knight and Elite Dangerous.
The move comes after numerous social games firms
test the limits of the free - to - play
model, which — though once a
subject of doubt — has created a multi-billion-dollar industry.
No
model has yet been
subjected to this
test.
But then we are facing the problem of, how good the
models are, and how valid are the
tests they are
subjected to.
The obvious reason for the deep divide on this
subject is that the IPCC offers
modeling which can not be
tested for decades ahead.
At this point, belief in one of those
models over others is tantamount to a religious belief because none of them has been
subjected to stringent
testing of any kind (comparisons of
model predictions to out of sample data being the best.)
The standard mechanism of the Popperian hypothetico - deductive
model is to pose an argument, grounded or instrumental, and
subject it to
tests which threaten it with embarrassment.
For example, no - one seriously thinks that computer
modelling should be
subject to the same requirements as a field
test.
«We should not be using public money to pay for faster and faster computers so that increasingly fine - grained climate
models can be
subjected to ever larger numbers of simulations until we have got the data to
test whether the predictions of existing
models are confirmed (or not disconfirmed) by the evidence.»
The
test involved
subjecting all three smartphone
models (which feature OLED displays, which are notably vulnerable to burn - in) to 510 hours of showing a static image at full brightness.
We pitted a Galaxy S6 and S6 Edge against two iPhone 6 Plus
models for 12 rounds of image - quality
tests with different types of
subjects and lighting conditions.
Longitudinal logistic
models and ordered regression
models with clustering for repeated measures across
subjects adjusted for infant gender and visit were used to assess maternal and infant predictors of TV exposure and to
test whether infants with both maternal and infant risk factors had higher odds of more detrimental TV exposure.
Leading home visiting
models have been
subjected to rigorous
testing with scientifically validated control groups.
To
test the revised two - factor
model with three lower - level maladaptive factors (
model 2), we
subjected it to a CFA.