In a classic circular argument, they programmed temperature to increase with a CO2 increase then argued that
the model output proved their assumption.
Not exact matches
Tesla Inc. exhorted its factory workers to
prove wrong the «haters» betting against the company and is letting a small number of volunteers join the effort to ramp up
output of the crucial
Model 3 line.
«In the early 2000s DOE funded two SciDAC projects to study supernova explosions, we basically took the
output of those
models and passed them through a lensing system to
prove that the effects are achromatic,» says Nugent.
Dr. Andrew Hill: But eventually and — and so caloric restriction is the only biohacking modality that's been
proven to actually affect aging, but in
model organisms, it does do it at the cost of metabolic
output and it probably --
Derived from the
proven 911 Turbo and adapted specifically for the 718 S
models, this technology helps to deliver excellent responsiveness at low engine speeds and provide a high maximum power
output.
The 2015 Tesla
Model S P85D
proves that two motors are better than one in an electric car, the additive
output rated at 691 horsepower and enabling what Tesla calls Insane acceleration mode.
In the case of the petrol
models too, «more power and more driving pleasure with even lower fuel consumption»
proves to be the perfect formula: the E 200 CGI BlueEFFICIENCYmodel with direct petrol injection has a displacement of 1.8 litres and an
output of 135 kW / 184 hp yet consumes a mere 6.8 litres of premium unleaded petrol per 100 kilometres (provisional NEDC combined figure).
However, when comparing
model outputs against Hurst climate persistence, I find that the catastrophic majority anthropogenic global warming hypothesis to be formally «Not
Proven» per Bray (2005), and Johnson (2013).
and guess what ---- the Sun» w
output that does vary is figured in as a constant -------- we all have heard about the 11 year sun spot cycle and its related sun's
output variations ------ that is not included in any
model for it would
prove that C02 is that the driving factor ------ but the sun's
output -------- note the warmth of the sun on a hot summer day -------- if the sun varies 0.1 % it will effect the temperature on earth, and also Mars ------
But that does not
prove relativity is wrong, nor establish aether theory as valid; it merely explains the origin of «mad scientists»; such as will believe uncritically in the
outputs of «vapour - free» climate
models.
The question is not to
prove that GCMs are bad a global forecasting but to show that these
models, and especially aggregated
outputs from these
models, are of any use.
Well... I guess this is just because when you pretend urging policy makers making decisions about climate evolution, with heavy political and economic consequences, those decisions being fully based onto climate
models»
outputs, then you have to
prove that those climate
models are able to faithfully simulate «real world climate».