Sentences with phrase «modern warm era»

However, even under current Modern Warm Era conditions, crops, other plants, animals and people will benefit from more carbon dioxide.

Not exact matches

Global warming in the modern era is being driven by increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, which leads to an enhanced greenhouse effect.

In our modern era it gives us a big hint on how much warming from greenhouse gases truly exists.

But along with supporting the general picture of a long temperature slide until the modern era's warming, the analysis reveals fascinating regional variations, including these:

John Carter August 8, 2014 at 12:58 am chooses to state his position on the greenhouse effect in the following 134 word sentence: «But given the [1] basics of the greenhouse effect, the fact that with just a very small percentage of greenhouse gas molecules in the air this effect keeps the earth about 55 - 60 degrees warmer than it would otherwise be, and the fact that through easily recognizable if [2] inadvertent growing patterns we have at this point probably at least [3] doubled the total collective amount in heat absorption and re-radiation capacity of long lived atmospheric greenhouse gases (nearly doubling total that of the [4] leading one, carbon dioxide, in the modern era), to [5] levels not collectively seen on earth in several million years — levels that well predated the present ice age and extensive earth surface ice conditions — it goes [6] against basic physics and basic geologic science to not be «predisposed» to the idea that this would ultimately impact climate.»

It then shows the cooling through the lia and the subsequent warming into the modern era.

The period of greatest change from cold to warm is approx 1690 to 1740, not the modern era.

Already 46 new graphs from 40 + scientific papers undermine claims that modern era warming — or, in some regions, modern cooling — is climatically unusual.

Would skeptics accept that the modern era is warmer than Medieval times if it came from someone else.

Researchers around the globe continue to build on the mountain of scientific evidence that the Medieval Period had warmer temperatures than the modern era.

The Earth's temperature has warmed in the modern era as a consequence of the strong solar activity during the 20th century (the Modern Maximum) shielding cosmic ray intensification and thus reducing decadal - scale cloud cover, which leads to warming via an increase in absorbed surface solar radiation (as illustrated here by Ogurtsov et al., 2012 and detailed by Avakyan, 2013, McLean, 2014, and otmodern era as a consequence of the strong solar activity during the 20th century (the Modern Maximum) shielding cosmic ray intensification and thus reducing decadal - scale cloud cover, which leads to warming via an increase in absorbed surface solar radiation (as illustrated here by Ogurtsov et al., 2012 and detailed by Avakyan, 2013, McLean, 2014, and otModern Maximum) shielding cosmic ray intensification and thus reducing decadal - scale cloud cover, which leads to warming via an increase in absorbed surface solar radiation (as illustrated here by Ogurtsov et al., 2012 and detailed by Avakyan, 2013, McLean, 2014, and others).

He theorizes that the Earth's temperature has warmed in the modern era as a consequence of the strong solar activity during the 20th century (the Modern Maximum) shielding cosmic ray intensification and thus reducing decadal - scale cloud cover, which leads to warming via an increase in absorbed surface solar radiation (as illustrated here by Ogurtsov et al., 2012 and detailed by Avakyan, 2013, McLean, 2014, and otmodern era as a consequence of the strong solar activity during the 20th century (the Modern Maximum) shielding cosmic ray intensification and thus reducing decadal - scale cloud cover, which leads to warming via an increase in absorbed surface solar radiation (as illustrated here by Ogurtsov et al., 2012 and detailed by Avakyan, 2013, McLean, 2014, and otModern Maximum) shielding cosmic ray intensification and thus reducing decadal - scale cloud cover, which leads to warming via an increase in absorbed surface solar radiation (as illustrated here by Ogurtsov et al., 2012 and detailed by Avakyan, 2013, McLean, 2014, and others).

Yet, as noted before, major period warming rates for the early 20th century easily exceed those of the modern CO2 «doomsday» era.

Per NOAA's own empirical dataset, the earlier 20th century warming cumulative amount was actually greater than the modern era period ending in December 2015 — and remember, the December 2015 temperatures anomaly just had an incredible surge due to the current El Niño peak.

Each has been used in a unique peer reviewed study confirming that the Arctic polar regions during the Medieval Warming Period (MWP) were warmer than the modern era.

As represented by the 30 - year global average shifts, the first span of global warming (consisting of the first 4 shifts up) was very lengthy, reaching all the way into the 1970's - this long span being primarily well before the gargantuan consumer / industrial CO2 emissions from the late 20th century of the modern era.

If the warming trend of the early 20th century had continued (it didn't) until the end of the 21st century (2099), global temperatures would have increased by +1.92 °C; yet despite the huge modern era CO2 spike, if the warming trend represented by the last 3 decades continued (it won't), the increase by 2099 would only be +1.72 °C.

In conclusion, as stated in the first paragraph, modern warming over the last 25 years is not exceptional, nor unprecedented in spite of the gigantic accumulation of atmospheric CO2 emissions during the fossil fuel era.

B. Reconstructed temperature proxies reveal multiple climatic periods of acceleration and levels of cooling / warming that far exceed what the modern era has experienced.

Starting in the early 1700s, there are signs the warning rebound was beginning, but it wasn't until the late 1800's that one can discern a strong post-LIA warming trend that ushers in the modern era.

As has been well established by science, the caribou have survived both warmer and colder eras, than those of modern times, since the end of the last major ice age.

And this unprecedented warming of ocean waters occurred during a 30 - year period when human CO2 emissions were some 85 % less than the modern era (166 billion tonnes of CO2 emissions versus 784 billion tonnes for the most recent 30 - year span).

Since the end of 1944 though, the modern era warming only added another +0.40 °C on top of the 1944 peak, based on the high point for the rolling 12 - month average, which was reached in mid-1998 (Aug. 1998).

Per NOAA, prior to the modern era's huge industrial / consumer CO2 emissions, the global ocean warming was significantly greater, approaching the 2 degree per century rate in 1945.

With all the doom and gloom of global warming alarmism, this unexpected truth of modern global warming being less than the pre-modern era is an indicator that man - made catastrophe is not just around the corner.

• The warming phase during the modern era was 417 months in duration; the early 20th century period had a warming phase of 397 months (only a 20 - month difference).

Yep, no matter how one slices and dices the 5 - year average warming amounts, the modern era's warming represents an increase not even one - tenth of a degree greater than the pre-1950 warming — it is not only a statistically worthless difference, it is completely climate insignificant.

Global warming alarmists... scientists... shamans, are the «anti-science» flat - earthers of the modern era.

As main skeptical position N (2) says «The warming / sea levels / glacier and sea ice retreat / hurricane and drought intensities... experienced during the modern era are neither unprecedented or remarkable, nor do they fall outside the range of natural variability.»

N (2) The warming / sea levels / glacier and sea ice retreat / hurricane and drought intensities... experienced during the modern era are neither unprecedented or remarkable, nor do they fall outside the range of natural variability, as clearly shown in the first 150 graphs (from 2017) on this list.

Those Stubborn Facts: Per NOAA, Current Global Warming «Pause» Unprecedented In Modern Era - 190 Months Long

Global Warming Debate The debate over the causes and consequences of global warming (or «climate change») is one of the great controversies of the modeWarming Debate The debate over the causes and consequences of global warming (or «climate change») is one of the great controversies of the modewarming (or «climate change») is one of the great controversies of the modern era.

Global warming is the greatest hoax of the modern era and is seriously undermined by the fact that the Earth has been in one of its natural cooling cycles for the last seventeen years at this point.

In the National Post of April 2, 2001, after the UN had adopted this graph as the official proof of global warming, I pointed out that the first nine centuries of the millennium were measured by using tree - ring cycles, and the modern era was represented by temperatures.

dangerous and rapid global warming) took place prior to 1950 and the modern era's industrial / consumer CO2 emissions.

In a ground - breaking new paper (Lansner and Pepke Pedersen, 2018) published in the journal Energy and Environment, an analysis of land surface instrumental records from across the globe's ocean air sheltered (OAS) regions reveals that, like the proxy evidence presented above, most of the modern era warming occurred prior to the 1940s, and the there has effectively been no net warming since then.

As a matter of fact, looking at the modern era under the resolution limitations of the Marcott reconstruction, one might conjecture that the unnatural modern warming is preventing us from so quickly falling into an ice age of unkown duration.

In short, climate always changes and it is very difficult to see why some people get so excited about the modern era of warming

Still Earth's climate exhibits two stable states, the cold, snow - ball state and a warm state much like the modern era.

In this graph below (figure 13) showing the 10 year moving average, the low point is clearly the 1690's with the very earliest part of the graph potentially around as warm as the modern era.

Mann's research was thorough and interesting, and like Manley's work with CET, and Hansen's with global temperature, was a considerable feat of research and re-interpretation of existing knowledge, which until then had accepted considerable variability, with previous episodes of warming exceeding those in the modern era.

Global warming in the modern era is being driven by increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, which leads to an enhanced greenhouse effect.

First, we note that the record can be divided into three eras, consisting two perturbed climates — the rapid warming after the end of LIA and the modern period of anthropogenic warming after the Second Industrial Revolution — separated by a background climate when Europe experienced a century (1738 — 1849) of mild temperature with no trend.

The scientific evidence is unequivocal: There exist huge regional climate swaths of the globe that have mildly warmed in an unexceptional manner during the modern industrial / consumer era; and there exist multiple large areas that even lack any regional climate - significant modern warming whatsoever.

If you have an old school mind who always love the warm feeling of long gone era, then you may replicate it as your modern mantel decor ideas.