Modern liberal Christianity believes that it can ignore the doctrine of original sin in its definition and attainment of the good, both individually and socially.
Not exact matches
Theological
liberals invariably regard the
modern challenges as legitimate, and then argue that
Christianity needs to be reinterpreted accordingly.
Dalahäst So, like I said, you are actually a product of our
modern, more
liberal, egalitarian society, but you are insisting on giving credit for this to «
Christianity», as if
Christianity has always lined up with your beliefs.
This is a sort of religiosity that it is difficult for
modern, secular people to understand and appreciate; she goes against the grain not only of the more obvious kind of rationalistic secularism embodied in Rayber but against all of the best in
liberal Christianity, whether Catholic or Protestant.
This is a far cry from
liberal theology's effort to adapt
Christianity to the
modern world and make sense of culture on terms relevant to a rather confident secular and scientific age.
A similar fate has overtaken
modern liberal philosophical and theological schemas, (such as those of Hegel, Schleiermacher, Troeltsch and Rahner) on the relationship of
Christianity to the other religions.
«2 The diversity which Henry, as one of
modern evangelicalism's founders, laments has been noted more positively by Richard Quebedeaux in his book The Young Evangelicals - Revolution in Orthodoxy.3 In this book Quebedeaux offers a typology for the conservative wing of the Protestant church, differentiating Separatist Fundamentalism (Bob Jones University, Carl McIntire) from Open Fundamentalism (Biola College, Hal Lindsey), Establishment Evangelicalism (
Christianity Today, Billy Graham) from the New Evangelicalism (Fuller Theological Seminary, Mark Hatfield), and all of these from the Charismatic Movement which cuts into orthodox, as well as ecumenical
liberal and Roman Catholic constituencies.
Through such influences, I began to opt for a Reformation
Christianity self - consciously opposed to
modern Protestantism in both its conservative and
liberal forms.
As I stated earlier,
liberal Christianity is a middle road between Christ and culture in that it seeks to understand culture, not remove itself from
modern science or the arts.
Their approval or disapproval alone distinguished their otherwise parallel interpretations of the course of
modern history since the Renaissance, for the
liberals ascribed all virtue to
liberal Christianity and all vice to authoritarian Catholicism while their ultra-conservative colleagues in debate simply reversed the order.
The diverse and powerful forms of evangelism often uncontrolled by church officials influenced
modern Christianity far more profoundly than did a
liberal deconstruction of religion.
At no other point is there a deeper continuity between the
modern world and an original
Christianity, even if this is a continuity which is alien to our theology, and above all alien to all non-apocalyptic theology, which is to say to every theology which we have known as either an orthodox or a
liberal theology.