Not exact matches
What I find ironic is that it is his can - do optimism that is in this case working against our ability to do something about our dependence
on fossil fuels and the climate change that this dependence is resulting in, that is, switching to alternate energy, preserving modern civilization and the world economy beyond Peak Oil and Peak
Coal, preventing climate change from becoming such a huge problem that it destroys that the world economy — and
more than likely leads to a series of highly destructive
wars over limited resources.
Republicans are scurrying to label the move a hidden «national energy tax» and «
war on coal» (see the fine NBC online piece titled «Carbon Combat» for
more).
Policies driving technological innovation — in what critics have dubbed the «
war on coal» — are helping the United States transition its energy system to one that is cleaner and
more efficient.
Pruitt cited «the
war on coal» in a speech to Kentucky
coal miners Monday, but the Clean Power Plan is about
more than energy — it's about clean air and public health.
What she calls «claims» from those expressing concerns with the President's plan — that regulating carbon will increase energy prices, hurt the economy, destroy jobs, and wage
war on coal —
more accurately reflect the facts.
It is far from clear whether Trump can do much
more for
coal than remove most or even all the climate - related regulations discouraging the use of
coal, and this may not have a huge effect since to date the major adverse effects of the «
war on coal»
on raising electricity prices have not yet occurred because of the Supreme Court's stay
on the so - called Clean Power Plan.
Better yet would be to debate an energy policy for the USA, including opening up exploratory oil and gas drilling including shale deposits, limiting the exponential growth of regulations currently stifling new exploration, ending the EPA regulatory
war on coal, reactivating the Keystone pipeline, etc.; these issues have direct impact
on American jobs and future energy independence, both of which are
more important issues for US voters (and presidential candidates) than any «climate» debate.
Without serious action, the administration's accelerating
wars on coal, guns, the Constitution, state sovereignty, the economy, jobs, and
more will continue to wreak real havoc
on Americans and the world.
The EPA is supposed to enforce the Clean Water Act, and the
more aggressive posture is part of the «
War on Coal» that energy companies furiously denounce.