Sentences with phrase «more fake science»

More fake science on the facts of real science..

More fake science from the BBC.

Not exact matches

The reality is more complex, she said, and will require more use of sound social science and evidence - based approaches to sort out the allure of fake news.

It performed well doing sutures on fake tissue (see video, above), but its performance on living tissue from pigs was more impressive, as reported today in Science Translational Medicine.

Truthful tweets took six times as long as fake ones to spread to 1500 people across Twitter — in large part because falsehoods were 70 per cent more likely to be retweeted than the truth, even after accounting for the posters» account age, activity level and number of followers (Science, doi.org/gc3jt6).

There's a considerable amount of absurdity to the foundation of the plan by Tony Mendez (Affleck, quite strong in stone - faced performance, making his occasional outward displays of emotion even more valuable): Fake a medium - to - low budget science - fiction movie that would necessitate shooting in Tehran.

Suddenly, we seem to live in a time dominated by «fake news», «alternative facts», conspiracy theories, scepticism of scientific research, partial accounts parading as «the real truth which has hitherto been concealed from us, the people», revolts against allegedly smug academic elites and distant political elites — a time where YouTube videos claiming research into climate change to be a scam get far more viewers than videos presenting the science of climate change.

A controversial recent study [MOTIVATED REJECTION OF SCIENCE — NASA faked the moon landing, Therefore (Climate) Science is a Hoax: An Anatomy of the Motivated Rejection of Science] has shown that prominent climate sceptics are six times more likely to show narcissistic characteristics than the rest of the comSCIENCE — NASA faked the moon landing, Therefore (Climate) Science is a Hoax: An Anatomy of the Motivated Rejection of Science] has shown that prominent climate sceptics are six times more likely to show narcissistic characteristics than the rest of the comScience is a Hoax: An Anatomy of the Motivated Rejection of Science] has shown that prominent climate sceptics are six times more likely to show narcissistic characteristics than the rest of the comScience] has shown that prominent climate sceptics are six times more likely to show narcissistic characteristics than the rest of the community.

Climate campaigners seem to think they have a winner with this takedown of elected officials who reject global warming science, in which fake news reports talk of the turmoil and tragedy created by Hurricane Marco Rubio, Hurricane James Inhofe, Hurricane John Boehner and more.

As with the rest of the AGWScienceFiction Greenhouse Effect, your link takes to a page of more joke fake fisics from august bodies of science conned by magic tricks of clever sleights of hand and word play, here's a better link:

IN other words, just more ad hoc, we'll fake it til we make it, «gold standard» science culminating in what else....

a) Their emotive commitment to the imminent calamity that consensus climate science forecasts is so deep, they have sacrificed all skepticism in this domain and * themselves * truly believe the faked stories simply because they purport to come from climate scientists (authority) and hence are yet more indicators of general anticipated calamity.

As a science professional myself, I have witnessed many times that it takes a HECK of a lot more work for someone to try to fake up a «defensible» set of data, than it does to do the diligent work to generate a good data set to begin with.

Many scientists recognize there is a more direct correlation to solar energy cycles and global temperature than there is between carbon dioxide concentration and temperature readings (especially in light of the fake science that has been recently revealed).

Maybe it's important to take public whacks at the Fake Science and this is more important than the timing of undoing endangerment?

The climate models create ~ 66 % more than real lower atmosphere warming by the fake «back radiation» idea, taught in US Atmospheric Science for ~ 50 years, coupled with the fake single -18 deg C OLR emitter idea, which provides an imaginary negative Down flux in the bowdlerised two - stream approximation (blame Sagan for this).

According to John Mashey's report, «Fake science, fakexperts, funny finances, free of tax» (PDF), the Science and Public Policy Institute is «actually not much more than Ferguson, a PO box in a UPS store and a website, plus «advisors.science, fakexperts, funny finances, free of tax» (PDF), the Science and Public Policy Institute is «actually not much more than Ferguson, a PO box in a UPS store and a website, plus «advisors.Science and Public Policy Institute is «actually not much more than Ferguson, a PO box in a UPS store and a website, plus «advisors.»

One of the reasons I come here is to continue to educate myself, and I find that moderation is exactly as stated — gentle, patient, and sticking to science until the commenter begins to be more obvious, if less genuine, in spouting the party line in the fake skeptic movement.