Not exact matches
Overall, I estimate the
mass balance of the Greenland
ice sheet to be about -80 + / -10 cubic km of
ice per year in 2000 and -110 + / -15 cubic km of
ice per year in 2004, i.e.
more negative than based on partial altimetry surveys of the outlet glaciers.
The surface
mass balance (SMB) results show a very favourable correlation (r ^ 2 > 0.90) with
more than 500 SMB observations all over the
ice sheet, from firn cores, snow pits, etc..
The impacts of
ice shelf collapse and ensuing glacier acceleration are substantial, but in general, the effects of ocean melt are proving to be far
more important in controlling
ice sheet
mass balance.
Because Antarctica drains
more than 80 percent of its
ice sheet through floating
ice shelves, accelerated glacier flow has the potential to affect
ice sheet
mass balance dramatically and raise sea level (Pritchard et al. 2012).
Here, considerable value can be derived from ship - based observations, aerial overflights, and drifting (
mass -
balance) buoys that provide a
more accurate picture of the distribution of different
ice types.
Secondary objectives: Four secondary objectives have been defined: - To assess the effect of a
more accurate simulation of sea
ice drift and deformation on the Arctic sea
ice mass balance and distribution properties of sea
ice age.
And
more recent estimates of the Antarctic
mass balance contribution to sea level rise has the East Antarctica
ice sheet gaining
mass at a
more accelerated pace for 2003 - 2013 than the mere +14 Gt per year identified by Shepherd et al. (2012) for 1992 - 2011.
Current models suggest
ice mass losses increase with temperature
more rapidly than gains due to increased precipitation and that the surface
mass balance becomes negative (net
ice loss) at a global average warming (relative to pre-industrial values) in excess of 1.9 to 4.6 °C.
The two big
ice shelves still lose
mass predominantly through calving, Thwaites shelf is
balanced between the two, PIG is
more basal melt.