Sentences with phrase «more surface mass»

More surface mass would kill more birds, not fewer.

Not exact matches

Underlying all the surface - changes of present - day history, the reality and paramount importance of a single basic event is becoming daily more manifest: namely, the rise of the masses, with its natural corollary, the socialization of Mankind.
The human mass, because on the confined surface of this planet it is in a state of continuous additive growth, in numbers and interconnections, must automatically become more and more tightly concentrated upon itself.
We can think of these new political machines as existing alongside campaigns» mass - media outreach to the uncommitted, but they'd usually be running much more below the surface.
Delivering more mass to Martian orbit can then mean getting more robotic rovers, supplies or what have you to the surface.
Next, to make multimodal imaging even more powerful, the researchers are considering coupling thermal desorption mass spectrometry — a destructive technique that cooks matter off a surface to enable its chemical analysis — with optical spectroscopy, a nondestructive technique.
With the more primitive biface technology, a mass of stone was shaped through the removal of flakes from two surfaces in order to produce bigger tools such as a hand axes.
«The roadmap to a future human Mars landing has many challenges; we must develop additional capability to land more mass on the surface accurately and precisely,» said Gazarik.
The new cyclodextrin polymers have an enormous surface area per mass: 250 m2 per gram, meaning that 2 grams of the stuff contains more than enough surface area to completely cover an NBA basketball court.
«Nanomaterials, because of their size, are more bioavailable; and because of their surface area to mass, they are more chemically reactive.
Astronomers have found more than 1,000 «low - surface - brightness» galaxies over the past decade, significantly altering our views of how galaxies evolve and how mass is distributed in the universe
The team's computer simulation of the glacierlike flow within each mass suggests that the surface ice moves horizontally at no more than a few centimeters each year, which nevertheless is quick enough to totally resurface each polygonal cell every 500,000 years or so.
This situation could occur if, for example, the amount of mass leaving a star was not the same at every point on the surface of that star — say, if more mass was driven off from the equator of the star than from its poles.
While its similarities to Earth likely end with Kepler 78b's size and mass, Winn says there is still more to learn about the planet, such as its surface and atmospheric composition — a goal that the group plans to pursue next.
Such stars have masses of at least eight times that of the Sun and high surface temperatures of 10 000 K or more, but they exhaust their hydrogen supply more quickly than starts of lower mass: over some tens of mil - lions of years, compared to billions of years for stars like the Sun.
With less than 20 percent of Sol's mass, Proxima is so small that it can transport core heat to its surface only through convection, unlike larger red dwarf stars like Gliese 752 A — also known as Wolf 1055 A or Van Biesbroeck's Star (more).
If these polar continents lose a mile or more of ice from their land surface, there will be less mass, and so some of the water now attracted to those polar land masses will dissipate, and go elsewhere.
Using these steady - states, we find that if volatile cycling is either solely dependent on temperature or seafloor pressure, exoplanets require a high abundance (more than 0.3 % of the total mass) of water to have fully inundated surfaces.
The star is losing mass from most of its surface, but, like the Sun, loses more from disturbed regions.
The convection zone reaches up to the sun's surface, and makes up 66 percent of the sun's volume but only a little more than 2 percent of its mass.
In general, smaller materials and ones with rougher or more convoluted surfaces have a greater exterior surface area — per unit mass — than larger items or ones with smoother exteriors.
If a larger mass of warm air has to pass through it, more energy is transferred, through the evaporator's fins (so that even the evaporator's design and, in particular, its exchange surface play an important part) from the air to the liquid refrigerant allowed inside it by the TEV or orifice tube so it expands more and, along with the absolute pressure inside the evaporator, the refrigerant's vapor superheat (the delta between the boiling point of the fluid at a certain absolute pressure and the temperature of the vapour) increases, since after expanding into saturated vapour, it has enough time to catch enough heat to warm up further by vaporizing the remaining liquid (an important property of a superheated vapour is that no fluid in the liquid state is carried around by the vapour, unlike with saturated vapour).
While all of that is good, more so since its likely to be a lower priced version of the Surface aimed for the masses, what is not is that the tablet is touted to run just the preview version of Office 2013 RT..
The ease and convenience of flipping on the power and swishing an index finger across a glass - like surface has more than won over the masses.
The spot paintings are nothing more than colour, calculations, sheer surface and mass production — Hirst's dissociative attempt at being more like a scientist, in the way that Andy Warhol wanted to be more like a machine.
The paintings with which he first began to make his name a decade or more earlier, alongside his contemporaries Leon Kossoff and Lucian Freud, seem intent on a kind of one - upmanship in demonstrating the sheer mass of pigment that a surface can hold; his Head of EOW — his first muse Stella West — seems to emerge Golem - like from clay and mud, the same ooze of material that clogs his Building Site, Earl's Court Road, Winter of two years earlier.
The surface mass balance (SMB) results show a very favourable correlation (r ^ 2 > 0.90) with more than 500 SMB observations all over the ice sheet, from firn cores, snow pits, etc..
Possibly due to surface properties, or sheer mass giving way to potential to bump into things more?
Seems to me the debate about AGHG global warming and increasing TC frequency / intensity / duration boils down to the fact that as sea surface temperatures, as well as deeper water temperatures rise, the wallop of any TC over warmer seas without mitigating circumstances like wind sheer and dry air off land masses entrained in the cyclone will likely be much more devastating.
Interference pattern more likely comes from «bounce» the midpoint between the surface of the planet, and the very center of the planet, leaving a hole in the middle, that is balanced in size, against the pushes and pulls of the universe, against the mass that stay's within the earths «bubble of influence», basically, the megnetopause, the moon, the atmosphere, the water, and the cloud of charged particles that would exist above and below us, if they didn't intermingle, and / or, get blown away by the solar wind.
Omni block has more thermal advantage being that we have an exposed masonry surface letting us use thermal mass to our advantage.
In 2010 Greenland lost more surface ice mass than in any other year since modern observations began, researchers of City College New York reported on Friday.
If the surface and lower atmosphere become warmer than the temperature set by insolation, gravity and mass they will emit more energy to space, there will be more energy outgoing than incoming and the system will cool back to the earlier temperature.
The rains, at least meteorologically speaking, were not unexpected; the combination of slow - moving, low - pressure tropical air mass fed by high sea surface temperatures, and record humidity — in addition to the unpredictability of climate change — make catastrophic floods more likely.
All that the gravito - thermal GHE does is redistribute the heat from the only energy SOURCE the Sun, more to the surface (the 33K G - T) and less to the upper troposphere (the even larger NEGATIVE -LRB--35 C) ANTI-GREENHOUSE EFFECT) from the center of mass of the atmosphere at 5.1 km to the top of the troposphere.
It is not that bacteria produced hydrocarbons, but that the primordial hydrocarbon «soup» gave food to bacteria.The total mass of organic substance of these microbes is estimated to be hundreds of thousands of gigatons, much more than the organic mass of surface biota.»
Land mass and ocean mass surface thermal radiation are orders of magnitudes of more energy than the atmospheric thermal radiations.
AGW climate scientists seem to ignore that while the earth's surface may be warming, our atmosphere above 10,000 ft. above MSL is a refrigerator that can take water vapor scavenged from the vast oceans on earth (which are also a formidable heat sink), lift it to cold zones in the atmosphere by convective physical processes, chill it (removing vast amounts of heat from the atmosphere) or freeze it, (removing even more vast amounts of heat from the atmosphere) drop it on land and oceans as rain, sleet or snow, moisturizing and cooling the soil, cooling the oceans and building polar ice caps and even more importantly, increasing the albedo of the earth, with a critical negative feedback determining how much of the sun's energy is reflected back into space, changing the moment of inertia of the earth by removing water mass from equatorial latitudes and transporting this water vapor mass to the poles, reducing the earth's spin axis moment of inertia and speeding up its spin rate, etc..
I also think that increasing urbanization would affect this factor, as urban surfaces would get hotter than the air temperature during the day and would not be as likely to cool at night to a temperature below the air temperature because they started out hotter at sundown and they have more thermal mass.
This is accomplished by having lots of surface area of masonry thermal mass directly exposed to sunlight, which is much more effective for storing heat than mass not in direct sun.
23) A returning warm pulse will try to expand the tropical air masses as more energy is released and will try to push the air circulation systems poleward against whatever resistance is being supplied at the time by the then level of solar surface activity.
However there is a contraction of volume but that immediately pulls in more air from the surroundings so the original volume then contains more mass than before which must give a rise in surface pressure rather than a fall.
Another avenue for monitoring is satellite measurements of column inventories of the gases, which provide much more detailed spatial coverage but no vertical resolution, in which air masses at different altitudes may carry gases that originated from different parts of the Earth's surface.
Feverishly hot ocean surface waters potentially reaching more than 104 degrees Fahrenheit (40 degrees Celsius) may have helped cause the greatest mass extinction in Earth's history, researchers say.
Current models suggest ice mass losses increase with temperature more rapidly than gains due to increased precipitation and that the surface mass balance becomes negative (net ice loss) at a global average warming (relative to pre-industrial values) in excess of 1.9 to 4.6 °C.
ii) In the case of the Ideal Gas Law it is the height of an atmosphere of a given mass that determines the number of molecules per unit of volume at the surface and the more molecules per unit of volume the hotter the surface will become at a given level of solar input.
A returning warm pulse will try to expand the tropical air masses as more energy is released and will try to push the air circulation systems poleward against whatever resistance is being supplied at the time by the then level of solar surface turbulence.
Is there any likelihood a bloom of plankton (from a freshwater pulse, or fallout of a dust cloud full of minerals, for example) would change the temperature of the surface water (change the reflectivity, I suppose, or change how much is absorbed by making more complicated molecules for photosynthesis)-- sufficient to make the water mass density change, affecting whether it sinks or not?
The IPCC has already concluded that it is «virtually certain that human influence has warmed the global climate system» and that it is «extremely likely that more than half of the observed increase in global average surface temperature from 1951 to 2010» is anthropogenic.1 Its new report outlines the future threats of further global warming: increased scarcity of food and fresh water; extreme weather events; rise in sea level; loss of biodiversity; areas becoming uninhabitable; and mass human migration, conflict and violence.
The surface mass balance observations similarly indicate that the ELA has migrated upwards at a rate of 44 m / a over the 1997 — 2011 period in West Greenland, resulting in a more than doubling of the ablation zone width during this period...»
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z