More vegetation produces more atmospheric CO2.
Not exact matches
As the climate continues to warm and
produce more severe droughts, fires and tree die - off events across the western United States, the potential for widespread
vegetation - type conversion is becoming increasingly plausible.
The wet winter
produces a lot of
vegetation and then the arid winter dries it out so that it burns
more easily.
In the end, the research suggests that greenery enhanced with carbon nanotubes could potentially
produce more from sunlight, air and water, although adding such nanomaterials would be both laborious and may have unknown long - term impacts on the
vegetation as a whole as well as on the environment.
If it takes 100 plus years to double the concentration of CO2, and if the equilibrium response is a 2C increase (Pierrehumbert, «Principles of Planetary Climate», p 623), and if the increased CO2
produces increased
vegetation and crop growth, then the present rate of development of non-fossil fuel power and fuel generation is
more appropriate than an Apollo type project or attempt to get rid of all fossil fuel use by 2050 starting now as fast as can be done.