Most of the case law involves inadvertent «oops» style disclosures of attorney - client privileged documents (keep in mind that...
In my own entry on the subject, I highlighted that
most of the case law setting out the «suitability test» is in union contexts - interpreting and applying collective agreements, which usually do expressly define probation.
Not exact matches
The outcome: Some lawyers feel Thompson's
case could cause a rash
of copycat suits, but
most agree the
case will go nowhere, given that no
laws have been broken, and considering that outrageous popcorn and soda prices are a theatre's greatest source
of revenue — something that is unlikely to change in the near future.
Each member
of the Audit Committee shall meet the independence standards and expertise requirements
of the New York Stock Exchange corporate governance listing standards, the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and rules promulgated thereunder, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act
of 1991 (FDICIA), and other applicable
laws and regulations, in each
case, as
of the Firm's
most recent annual meeting.
Hagens Berman is one
of the
most successful auto litigation
law firms in the U.S. and is presently leading nationwide
cases against Volkswagen, GM, Mercedes and Fiat Chrysler for use
of diesel emissions - cheating software.
Not that I wanted to be a lawyer, but I wanted to know enough about different areas
of law to see where economics would be
most useful Unlike
most other economists, I actually enjoyed reading
law cases.
Everyone's at it, and while
most people aren't breaking the
law in the pursuit
of profit, there's a
case for saying that manipulation should simply be accepted as part
of life.
If a business is owned by a properly established trust, and it is sued, in
most cases the only assets that can be attacked or attached in a court
of law are those that are in the trust itself.
And the decisions made in forced arbitration proceedings are final — meaning in
most cases they can't be appealed in a court
of law.
I'm reading NFIB v. Sebelius (the Obamacare decision) in preparation for teaching the
case to my constitutional
law students and came across the following
most interesting passage in in Justice Ginsburg's opinion: «A mandate to purchase a particular product would be unconstitutional if, for example, the edict impermissibly abridged the freedom
of speech, interfered with the free exercise
of religion, or infringed on a liberty interest protected by the Due Process Clause.»
So far, «
most of the high - profile
cases involve state or local actions that would not be covered by the federal protections,» said John Inazu, a professor at Washington University School
of Law who has written several times about such
cases for CT..
The categorical imperative to «treat humanity, whether in thine own person or in that
of any other, in every
case as an end withal, never as means only» (46) was, for Kant, the «universal
law of nature» (38) and his understanding
of it is the
most radical conception
of natural
law in its modern sense.
It is, at least, apparent that the debates about humanitarian intervention by military force in the last decade, about the creation
of international criminal tribunals in a number
of cases, about the idea
of a state's «universal jurisdiction» in
cases of violations
of the Genocide Convention or other «crimes against humanity,» about how far the global war on terror may proceed without violating the rights
of states, and
most recently, about the United - States - led use
of force against the Saddam Hussein regime in Iraq, have all raised important points
of positive and customary international
law, and that in every one
of these
cases the outcome remains unsettled.
That he ran and was elected president on a platform
of, as he says, treating people differently under the
law — in this
case not allowing gays to marry — renders this
most recent articulation
of ideological colonization all the more arrogant and ironic.
Nor are there lacking among
most peoples some legal requirements established by the gods, as in the
case of the Mosaic and Levitical
law in the Bible.
The
cases of priestly abuse should be treated on a
case — by —
case basis according to Catholic canon
law and
most of all according to Christian charity.
The
most interesting thing I've discovered lately is that Deuteronomy is all in Moses» words and there is a
case for separating the 10 commandments from the
Law (teaching)
of Moses.
His
case is one
of 32 —
most of them involving Protestant Christians — identified by the group Forum 18, as examples
of how the
law is being enforced.
Only in the
most extreme circumstances do they permit the taking
of life; both our traditions and our
law, for example, forbid killing except in
case of legitimate selfdefense.
The marriage contract is a
most powerful one that not even Congress and the President can overturn through special
laws, as seen during the
case of Terry Schiavo.
So I want to take what for moderns is the
most scandalous
of these scandalous
laws as our hard
case — those related to sexual sins — and press Jesus on his claim that these and other
laws in Moses reveal him and his grace, mercy, forgiveness, and love (Lk 24:27, 44, cf., John 5:46).
Since the Supreme Court, in the
case of Furman v. Georgia in 1972, invalidated
most existing
laws permitting capital punishment, several states have enacted new legislation designed to meet the court's objections to the Georgia
law.
This is all the more striking as» what Luke could not foresee» the rules on inheritance were to become one
of the trickiest and
most developed in Islamic religious
law, a nest
of case studies for students
of legal theory.
The same can not be said
of this
most illiberal Court, which has embarked on a course
of inscribing one after another
of the current preferences
of the society (and in some
cases only the counter-majoritarian preferences
of the society's
law - trained elite) into our Basic Law.&raq
law - trained elite) into our Basic
Law.&raq
Law.»
Such was Paul's dynamic theology, and Erasmus had failed, so Luther judged, to understand on the one hand the relative dignity and goodness
of the
Law, on its own merits, and on the other the fact that in any
case to keep it was useless, and indeed largely impossible for
most men without Christ: «Fulfilment without faith in Christ, even if it creates men like Fabricius, Regulus and others [heroes
of Roman history] who are wholly irreproachable in the sight
of men — no more resembles righteousness than sorb apples resemble figs.»
Any contamination
of food with impurities
of any kind may have
most serious consequences for a company, because under the product liability
law every food producer is liable for contaminations
of his products in
case a consumer should be harmed by such contaminations.
So that you are prepared in a
case of being separated from your child, or if your child becomes lost or missing: because then you have the
most updated information and
law enforcement is so grateful to have that because 99 %
of the time families are prepared.
In order to win back custody
of your children, you will
most likely need to work with an attorney who has experience winning similar family
law cases.
In the particular example
of laws regarding marijuana, there is a federal
law banning its possession or sale in
most cases, but some states do not impose a state
law against it.
International
law involving disputes between sovereign states, unlike
most kinds
of law, isn't something that gets resolved definitively by a tribunal in
most cases.
For
most of these interventions, and to the best
of my knowledge, the US did not even make a
case for having casus belli under international
law.
Most of the constitution is written but distributed among statutes,
case law, treaties conventions, traditions etc..
If we try to summary the whole answer, then we may say that the norms are not there, but two important aspects have to be considered: Threat to peace and security and massive human rights violations; meanwhile, if there are not such
cases, and the change has gone through the due process
of law and the new government has been able to gain the
most support
of the member states, then the new government is recognized.
«The lurid details underlying the
case — where county contracts and legislation were traded for personal favors — were laid out for all to see, leaving the public now to wonder whether even the
most brazen acts are beyond the grasp
of the
law.»
«It is difficult to understand why Borough President Adams, who prides himself on being someone who respects the
law and enforces order, is in this
case, putting those values aside to go against the
most local representatives
of the community and follow the lead
of people who deploy some
of the
most thuggish, vitriolic behavior,» said Lee Silberstein, a spokesman for the Rabsky Group.
«Local district attorneys work with local
law enforcement and I think it makes sense, in
most cases and certainly these types
of cases, that there is concern that there can be a conflict and even a perception
of a conflict
of interest,» Stewart - Cousins said, flanked by other senior and newly elected members
of the conference.
On this much,
most agree: That the Supreme Court took McDonnell's
case means a good number
of the justices think that U.S. public corruption
law is worth examining.
Tom Libous, one
of the state's
most prominent and powerful Republican lawmakers in the Senate, has been found guilty by jury
of lying to federal agents in a
case stemming from his son receiving a job at a politically connected
law firm in Westchester County.
Specifically,
most of the complications arise as a result
of the Bill not giving full effect, at least initially, to the general principles
of EU
law, given the impact they have had on decided
cases about, or applicable to, UK tax issues.
In
most cases, it appears that
laws and policies which grant personal freedoms and ease restrictions are seen as liberal, while the opposing viewpoint
of asserting heavier restrictions for some intended good is conservative.
In a review
of hundreds
of police
cases, the Civilian Complaint Review Board found scores
of incidents in which police officers misapplied or misunderstood the legal standards
of one
of the
most invasive
law enforcement tactics: entering a home.
«We're always trying to catch up to make sure we're ahead
of the banks, who in
most cases just don't want to abide by the
law,» said the bill's lead sponsor, State Sen. Jeff Klein.
Courts have generally held that due to this dual nature tribes have immunity from federal civil
cases,
most of the time, and are not subject to
laws of States the reservation is on.
I'm pretty sure
most of the federal
law enforcement agencies have external lines
of credit that can be used in
case of loss
of funding, but its not exactly insurance per se
The BHA's Head
of Public Affairs Naomi Phillips commented, «Recent years have seen some
of the
most compelling challenges to the
law and policy on assisted dying in the UK and, if successful, this
case could be key in affecting some change in this area.
Assemblyman Sheldon Silver — one
of the
most powerful men in Albany for two decades and a constant in shaping state policy under five governors — was found guilty Monday
of selling his office for legal fees, capping a trial that cast new light on the capital's lax ethics
laws and handing federal prosecutors a big win in a
case that had lacked a smoking gun.
David says under the new
law, the Regents can only allow a delay in special
cases, where it would be a «hardship» for the schools to meet the deadline, but can't just wholesale authorize a later compliance date for
most of the schools in the state.
The PAC should be empowered in at least the
cases of the
most egregious misfeasance to table a resolution for debate and voting on the floor
of the House
of Commons which, if passed, would then be sent to the Lords, and if agreed there too, would command the force
of law for being implemented.
«For example, the
law requires the conservation
of a 30 - meter strip
of forest cover along both banks
of any river, but this is not being enforced in
most cases,» she said.
The differences however, lie in legislation, where Sweden and
most European countries are not by
law required to have a code
of ethics nor an ethics and compliance programme — as is the
case in the US,» says Maira Babri.