Sentences with phrase «most parents of children»

Most parents of children, working or not, could use life insurance.

No one wants to file a birth injury case after the birth of their child, and most parents of children who suffer cephalohematomas will never have to file such cases.

Most parents of children from minority groups have high academic aspirations for their children and want to be involved in promoting their academic progress (Wong Fillmore, 1983).

I began my journey on behalf of my son as most parents of children with special needs do, hopeful and naïve.

Most parents of children with allergies have taught them at an early age to avoid nuts.

Most parents of children and teens are so harried between work and keeping up with their children's appointments that they would scarcely recognize themselves described as «a community of compassion.»

Not exact matches

Parents and teachers have complained that children were becoming addicted to the multiplayer online battle game, which, according to the company, has more than 200 million users, making it the world's most popular game of its kind.

And like most children who were adopted in the 60's, everything about my biological parents, my genealogy and how I came to be adopted remain cloaked behind a veil of secrecy.

The most effective use of reverse psychology for parents hoping to push older kids towards wise choices isn't to actively manipulate them towards your desired aim — i.e. by fake nonchalantly asking if perhaps your child would like to give up a sport or AP class - but rather to hand control back to a kid who feels like they're already being pushed toward a particular future.

«A significant expansion of the Child Tax Credit will help parents have more money at a time in their lives when they need it the most and give them the flexibility to make the best choices regarding their families» care,» Ivanka said in a statement late last month.

But most parents are not heeding the AAP's advice, with children under two spending an hour a day in front of screens, according to the survey

Since estate taxes are assessed only when bequests are left to someone other than a husband or wife — most commonly, when estates pass, after parents» death, to the children — it's smart to buy enough second - to - die coverage in the name of the beneficiary to pay off future estate - tax bills.

Among the most prevalent are parents who let their children take financial advantage of them.

He has indicated his desire that most of Obamacare be repealed, while retaining popular provisions such as allowing children to stay on their parents» plans until they're 26 and forcing insurers to cover people with pre-existing conditions.

We invest much less in young children, and that stems largely from the fact that most other advanced economies view early childhood education, child care and other benefits targeted at parents with young children as «public goods,» meaning investments that, absent public support, would be insufficiently made from the perspective of society's well - being.

Most of the time parents discourage their children from pursuing the arts because some of the time you will struggle to make ends meet.

Charles: Right, I think that's a huge demographic question that I haven't seen any really good statistics on because of course most of the boomers are still in their late 50s or 60s, early 70s and they're not yet to the point where the older generation like the boomer parents, the so - called silent generation, which has sold their houses or given them to their offspring, their adult children.

While most of the offerings are aimed at those saving for college — parents and children alike — anyone can open an account with Sallie Mae.

Wegscheider - Cruse says one of the most important lessons that parents impart to their children is to take action.

Some of them, maybe most, will have at least one parent or another relative who could take care of them, though the adults sometimes tried to hide that from us; they figure we will take better care of the children than they can, plus they won't have another mouth to feed.

It seems that most people who write about the joys and challenges of childrearing today are parents newly facing the daunting prospect of raising Christian children in a largely hostile world.

People who have no obvious stake in the matter, like most of the people who have expressed dismay at my wife and my decision to homeschool our children, tend to side with the establishment against the parents.

Because if the parents are willing to pull there children out of school, theres probally a good chance they wont learn most of those morals.

Most recently, Nancy Verrier in The Primal Wound and Ronald J. Nydam in Adoptees Come of Age have argued that an adopted child never fully recovers from the fact that he or she was relinquished by birth parent (s).

Parents rather than the state would again control one of the most significant influences shaping their children.

Because priestly love most closely mirrors the love of Christ Himself for His people, it has its own specific sorrows too, just as does married love, the love of parent for child, and the apostolate of one called to be single.

Your god is mean, non-sensical, and treats his children worse than the most heinous parents I have ever heard of.

As a teacher, I am well acquainted with modern parents, most of whom have little involvement in the life of their children.

A most particular threat to the human rights project is the coercive use of foreign aid and other international programs in order to advance alleged rights related to procreation, population control, and the independence of children from their parents (in the name of «children's rights»).

With public schools fast becoming incubators of gender ideology, parents need to cast off their fears of entering the fray, speak out, and, most importantly, teach their children that their sex is a beautiful, biological reality.

I concluded at the time of the riots that of all the things the government now needed to do, it was the married family which most urgently needed to be rebuilt: I was and remain as certain of that as anything I have ever written, and I have been saying it repeatedly for over 20 years: I was saying it, for instance, when I was attacking (in The Mail and also The Telegraph), as it went through the Commons, the parliamentary bill which became that disastrous piece of (Tory) legislation called the Children Act 1989, which abolished parental rights (substituting for them the much weaker «parental responsibility»), which encouraged parents not to spend too much time with their children, which even, preposterously, gave children the right to take legal action against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the nature of the smackChildren Act 1989, which abolished parental rights (substituting for them the much weaker «parental responsibility»), which encouraged parents not to spend too much time with their children, which even, preposterously, gave children the right to take legal action against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the nature of the smackchildren, which even, preposterously, gave children the right to take legal action against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the nature of the smackchildren the right to take legal action against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the nature of the smack.»

Nova Classical Academy, a K — 12 charter school in St. Paul, Minnesota, is the sort of school that most parents seeking a first - rate education for their children can only dream about.

The spouses are called to be parents, to form a family; but not a family most convenient to their calculated way of thinking, but one most generously conducive to the children making it up.

Most of the children in foster care are older and / or in large sibling groups and / or have special needs and / or minorities, parenting situations that can be daunting.

Obviously, we parent best and teach best when we are most sensitive to the hopes, fears, confusions, angers, excitements, frustrations, and insights of our children and students.

It is no surprise that The Truth and Meaning of Human Sexuality, a document from the Pontifical Council for the Family, calls the witness of parents «the most valid basis for educating children in love».

With the exception of a few wackos in the Idaho panhandle, home - schooling parents are not bent on isolating their children, and most home - schooled kids make friends through the Scouts or church groups or volunteering.

Is it possible that the most oppressive parents find in the atonement a conscious or unconscious validation of the abuse of children for a greater good?

Now there may not be a large supply of newborn infants which are what most adoptive parents want and they may have to wait 2 years for the child of their dreams, but if any parents out there have a safe caring home to share with some orphaned children you do not have to wait 2 years, so don't sell your lies here.

Most of the futile, destructive conflicts and many of the sexual problems stem directly from this circular Parent - Child interaction.

In this most elementary area of parent - child relationships, such a notion rescues discipline from connotations of punishment and has the further virtue of counseling foresight, according to which the best disciplining parent is the one who anticipates that from which the child alone can not protect himself and does something about it before the child is injured.

Fifth of all, as long as parents aren't outright abusing their children, most liberals (again, by which I mean liberal civilians) don't care how they choose to punish them.

The family - cluster house - church is one of the most promising spiritual growth groups available to support Christian parents in the nurture and instruction of their own children.

For it is in these encounters of the parent with the child that the values by which one lives are most tellingly communicated, and that the most crucial of all lessons — that of the primacy of loyalty to the good — may most impressively be taught.

Women suffer the most due to civil wars, being subject to rape, becoming single parents, made refugees and having to bring up children without proper schooling, social services and their traditional cultural environment of home, the extended family and village or town.

The parent «child relationship, as well as the marital relationship, has always been one of the most regulated in both positive and religious laws.

Most family scholars think that children are most likely to thrive in stable, two - parent families, regardless of their parents» sexual orientatMost family scholars think that children are most likely to thrive in stable, two - parent families, regardless of their parents» sexual orientatmost likely to thrive in stable, two - parent families, regardless of their parents» sexual orientation.

The President's plan would broaden the eligibility requirements of a current policy that grants deferred action to immigrants who came into the country illegally as children (expanding it to reach about 300,000 new individuals), and, most significantly, would also give the same protection to immigrant parents who have children born in the U.S..

Like most parents of autistic children, I cherish my daughter.

How has the State come to amass such power that it now feels free to assault the most fundamental relationship of all, that between parent and child?