Most public school officials report being satisfied with the services being provided their districts by private contractors.
Not exact matches
At the community level, support for
schools might also be enhanced under a regime of
public school choice, because fewer people would feel compromised, silenced, or alienated in an environment where well - intentioned
school officials are forced to accommodate conflicting constituent demands and wind up doing so in ways that favor the
most vocal, affluent, or well - organized.
Massachusetts education
officials have released data that they hope will counteract what they say is a false
public perception that
most students in the class of 2003 who haven't yet passed the state's high
school exit exams are members of minority groups or come from poor families.
The systematic evidence clearly shows that
school officials dominate special education, parents rarely challenge
school officials» decisions,
schools win
most of those challenges from parents, and parents very rarely get their children placed in private
schools at
public expense.
The Supreme Court's recent decision in Hazelwood
School District v. Kuhlmeier, which authorizes educators to supervise the content of official high - school newspapers, is the Court's most significant ruling in a free - speech case involving public - school students since it decided Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District almost 20 year
School District v. Kuhlmeier, which authorizes educators to supervise the content of
official high -
school newspapers, is the Court's most significant ruling in a free - speech case involving public - school students since it decided Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District almost 20 year
school newspapers, is the Court's
most significant ruling in a free - speech case involving
public -
school students since it decided Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District almost 20 year
school students since it decided Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community
School District almost 20 year
School District almost 20 years ago.
Tenth - grade world history students interview Chinese immigrants and record their stories; ninth - grade physical science students design and strength - test mock airplane wings; junior English students research, write, and illustrate children's nonfiction picture books; algebra students of all grades investigate a
public - transit problem and propose solutions to city
officials; sophomore geometry students build scale models of museums they've designed; students across the grades in an environmental - stewardship class raise
public awareness of a polluted river — all are examples of academically challenging projects that also manage to engage the minds, hands, and hearts of
most high
school students across a wide range of abilities and interests.
A
public governing board or
official — typically elected — made the
most important decisions about the
school's operations.
As parents, educators and taxpayers of Nevada, we the undersigned urge Nevada's
public officials to defend and expand the
most inclusive
school choice program in the nation.
Reducing or eliminating funding for these programs would also be especially harmful to charter management organizations that recruit heavily from the AmeriCorps alumni network, including KIPP, Success Academy Charter
Schools, and Green Dot Public Schools, all of which have formed official «career partnerships» with City Year, or Uncommon Schools, which advertises on the AmeriCorps alumni career site.34 Likewise, public charter schools and traditional districts looking to fill hard - to - staff schools and subject areas also rely on AmeriCorps - funded teacher residencies and teaching fellowships and would likely be in trouble if these programs disappeared.35 For example, Achievement First, a network of public charter schools, has described Teach For America as «its most effective recruiting source,» hiring both AmeriCorps members and alumni from the pro
Schools, and Green Dot
Public Schools, all of which have formed official «career partnerships» with City Year, or Uncommon Schools, which advertises on the AmeriCorps alumni career site.34 Likewise, public charter schools and traditional districts looking to fill hard - to - staff schools and subject areas also rely on AmeriCorps - funded teacher residencies and teaching fellowships and would likely be in trouble if these programs disappeared.35 For example, Achievement First, a network of public charter schools, has described Teach For America as «its most effective recruiting source,» hiring both AmeriCorps members and alumni from the prog
Public Schools, all of which have formed official «career partnerships» with City Year, or Uncommon Schools, which advertises on the AmeriCorps alumni career site.34 Likewise, public charter schools and traditional districts looking to fill hard - to - staff schools and subject areas also rely on AmeriCorps - funded teacher residencies and teaching fellowships and would likely be in trouble if these programs disappeared.35 For example, Achievement First, a network of public charter schools, has described Teach For America as «its most effective recruiting source,» hiring both AmeriCorps members and alumni from the pro
Schools, all of which have formed
official «career partnerships» with City Year, or Uncommon
Schools, which advertises on the AmeriCorps alumni career site.34 Likewise, public charter schools and traditional districts looking to fill hard - to - staff schools and subject areas also rely on AmeriCorps - funded teacher residencies and teaching fellowships and would likely be in trouble if these programs disappeared.35 For example, Achievement First, a network of public charter schools, has described Teach For America as «its most effective recruiting source,» hiring both AmeriCorps members and alumni from the pro
Schools, which advertises on the AmeriCorps alumni career site.34 Likewise,
public charter schools and traditional districts looking to fill hard - to - staff schools and subject areas also rely on AmeriCorps - funded teacher residencies and teaching fellowships and would likely be in trouble if these programs disappeared.35 For example, Achievement First, a network of public charter schools, has described Teach For America as «its most effective recruiting source,» hiring both AmeriCorps members and alumni from the prog
public charter
schools and traditional districts looking to fill hard - to - staff schools and subject areas also rely on AmeriCorps - funded teacher residencies and teaching fellowships and would likely be in trouble if these programs disappeared.35 For example, Achievement First, a network of public charter schools, has described Teach For America as «its most effective recruiting source,» hiring both AmeriCorps members and alumni from the pro
schools and traditional districts looking to fill hard - to - staff
schools and subject areas also rely on AmeriCorps - funded teacher residencies and teaching fellowships and would likely be in trouble if these programs disappeared.35 For example, Achievement First, a network of public charter schools, has described Teach For America as «its most effective recruiting source,» hiring both AmeriCorps members and alumni from the pro
schools and subject areas also rely on AmeriCorps - funded teacher residencies and teaching fellowships and would likely be in trouble if these programs disappeared.35 For example, Achievement First, a network of
public charter schools, has described Teach For America as «its most effective recruiting source,» hiring both AmeriCorps members and alumni from the prog
public charter
schools, has described Teach For America as «its most effective recruiting source,» hiring both AmeriCorps members and alumni from the pro
schools, has described Teach For America as «its
most effective recruiting source,» hiring both AmeriCorps members and alumni from the program.36
A massive property tax hike is the «
most likely» way for the financially teetering Chicago
Public Schools to find its way out of a sea of red ink, a major Wall Street ratings agency said Thursday — a conclusion district
officials were quick to reject.
Under No Child Left Behind, 100 percent of
public school students were supposed to be proficient in English and math by 2014 — a goal that
most education
officials dismiss as unrealistic.
While
most legislators would agree that local control of
public schools is important, this bill would take all control over the creation of charter
schools out of the hands of local
officials and give it to an unelected state commission — while simultaneously undermining the financial structure of traditional
schools which are under local control.
«One of the
most remarkable environments I have ever visited is Piedmont IB Middle
School,» said Sneha Shah - Coltrane, the North Carolina Department of
Public Instruction's top
official for education of gifted students.
The relationships between parents, traditional
public school officials and teachers are, for the
most part, superficial; the latter two are disinterested in any active parental involvement outside of the traditional jobs of supervising homework and attending field trips.
«It's a direct attack on
public education,» said Diane Ravitch, a historian and former Bush administration
official who has become one of the
most voluble critics of vouchers and charter
schools and a proponent of the term privatization.
It became
official Thursday: The largest,
most organized voice for Oklahoma teachers issued an ultimatum to legislators that teachers will shut down much of Oklahoma's
public -
school system indefinitely unless serious money is found to boost teacher pay and education funding.
However, those who have been
most directly impacted by his actions are mystified that
public officials would choose to hand their community's students and
schools over to him and his destructive leadership style.
Lip service about change — and that's what
most families will initially conclude when they hear from
school officials about a desire to value parent feedback — will always be trumped by action in the
public's eye.
By failing to put a charter
school moratorium in place, these public officials are effectively adding their seal of approve to the Charter School Industry's ongoing violation of the most fundamental laws and values of the United States and the State of Connec
school moratorium in place, these
public officials are effectively adding their seal of approve to the Charter
School Industry's ongoing violation of the most fundamental laws and values of the United States and the State of Connec
School Industry's ongoing violation of the
most fundamental laws and values of the United States and the State of Connecticut.
Unfortunately, those
most directly responsible for improving education — state
officials,
school board members, administrators, and teachers — and those concerned about its success — educators, parents, policymakers, and the
public — have few resources at their disposal to answer this question.
Nina Reese, president and executive director of the National Alliance for
Public Charter
Schools recently wrote in a US News and World Report column, «As a former
official at the U.S. Department of Education, I applaud the administration for leveraging the power of its bully pulpit to attract the ingredient
most important in a child's success: a high quality teacher.»
The median pay package for the top leaders of the 16 charter
schools in Boston was $ 170,000 last year, making
most of them among the highest - paid
public school officials in Boston, according to a Globe review of payroll data.