Stylist addendum: «
Most rules in fashion can be broken by someone who knows what they are doing, but generally speaking, yes, it's much more flattering to pair leggings with a long top,» St. Martin explains.
Not exact matches
An automatic booking for removing your shirt is perhaps one
ruling that
most fans would like to see abolished and one can well see why Van Persie would feel compelled to celebrate
in this
fashion after such a dramatic strike.
In fashion, there are these so called «rules» which overrule what we wear most of the times.But the real fun is in breaking these rule
In fashion, there are these so called «
rules» which overrule what we wear
most of the times.But the real fun is
in breaking these rule
in breaking these
rules.
There are no
rules in fashion really, just people's individual opinions on how different
fashion pieces should be styled and
most times they are based on personal style and preferences.
Most modern men understand the basic
fashion rules and are aware of the numerous styles that are
in trend.
Thats the
rule in cities like Paris and Milan and is practiced a lot during
fashion week, or crazy week as
most of our taxi drivers discribed
in when we explained why we were
in town.
A general
rule, due to demographic variances
in population
most of these brands are created
in Europe, however
in the last few years US
fashion market has been reformed by brands such as J. Crew and Reformation.
Sure,
rules are meant to be broken but, ironically, one of
fashion's biggest
rule - breakers, Rihanna, stayed true to the night's theme and provided one of the
most stunning looks and a moment that will likely be remember
in Met Gala red carpet history.
In my mind,
most fashion rules were created because some influential person decided that because a particular look didn't work for her, it didn't work for anyone.
Successive governments of the same
ruling Liberal Democratic Party, for the entirety of the postwar period, took the official position that Article 9 of the constitution can not be said to ban the country's right of individual self - defense
in its
most minimal
fashion, but they have consistently
ruled out the possibility of exercising CSD, engaging
in other countries» wars when Japan is not attacked, as unconstitutional.
The
rules were written with good intentions to correct examples of ignorance and to solve conflict before it happens but they are enforced
in blunt instrument
fashion without judgement (
most especially upon the individual that has the gall to actually want to build something) as a result of the Barney Fife mentality of local yokels who may have no idea why the
rule was written
in the first place.
The latter,
in its judgement of September 2010 (grudgingly) adopted the reasoning of the Court of Justice (so adieu to the ius cogens standard) and found
in favour of Mr Kadi,
ruling that the Commission had only paid heed to fundamental rights considerations
in the
most marginal
fashion.