Multiple evaluation measures (classroom observation, student academic growth, parent and student surveys) provide a well - rounded and comprehensive look at teacher performance.
Not exact matches
Charter school leader Deborah Kenny's op - ed in today's The New York Times argues against the move by many states toward teacher
evaluations based on
multiple measures, including both student progress on achievement tests and the reviews of principals.
The Governor's framework outlined a reasonable and rigorous
evaluation system based on
multiple measures of performance and fulfilled the commitment made by New York in its application for Race to the Top grant funding.
They implemented a rigorous teacher
evaluation system, based on
multiple measures of performance.
The new
evaluation system will provide clear standards and significant guidance to local school districts for implementation of teacher
evaluations based on
multiple measures of performance including student achievement and rigorous classroom observations.
The report tracked teacher retention patterns alongside effectiveness levels from 2011 - 13, when the state first implemented its
multiple measures evaluation system, the Tennessee Evaluator Acceleration Model (TEAM).
After extensive research on teacher
evaluation procedures, the
Measures of Effective Teaching Project mentions three different measures to provide teachers with feedback for growth: (1) classroom observations by peer - colleagues using validated scales such as the Framework for Teaching or the Classroom Assessment Scoring System, further described in Gathering Feedback for Teaching (PDF) and Learning About Teaching (PDF), (2) student evaluations using the Tripod survey developed by Ron Ferguson from Harvard, which measures students» perceptions of teachers» ability to care, control, clarify, challenge, captivate, confer, and consolidate, and (3) growth in student learning based on standardized test scores over multipl
Measures of Effective Teaching Project mentions three different
measures to provide teachers with feedback for growth: (1) classroom observations by peer - colleagues using validated scales such as the Framework for Teaching or the Classroom Assessment Scoring System, further described in Gathering Feedback for Teaching (PDF) and Learning About Teaching (PDF), (2) student evaluations using the Tripod survey developed by Ron Ferguson from Harvard, which measures students» perceptions of teachers» ability to care, control, clarify, challenge, captivate, confer, and consolidate, and (3) growth in student learning based on standardized test scores over multipl
measures to provide teachers with feedback for growth: (1) classroom observations by peer - colleagues using validated scales such as the Framework for Teaching or the Classroom Assessment Scoring System, further described in Gathering Feedback for Teaching (PDF) and Learning About Teaching (PDF), (2) student
evaluations using the Tripod survey developed by Ron Ferguson from Harvard, which
measures students» perceptions of teachers» ability to care, control, clarify, challenge, captivate, confer, and consolidate, and (3) growth in student learning based on standardized test scores over multipl
measures students» perceptions of teachers» ability to care, control, clarify, challenge, captivate, confer, and consolidate, and (3) growth in student learning based on standardized test scores over
multiple years.
For this reason, even modest
evaluations should include
multiple measures (a variety of sources of information) and
multiple methods (both a quantitative and qualitative approach).
The nature of the relationship between practices and achievement supports teacher
evaluation and development systems that make use of
multiple measures.
And each of the 43 states to which the Obama administration has granted a waiver from No Child Left Behind is now in the process of implementing
evaluation systems that employ
multiple measures of classroom performance, including student achievement data.
A good teacher is now recognized as someone whose students learn and grow, with 38 states revising their policies on educator effectiveness to include
measures of student growth or achievement as one of
multiple factors in teacher
evaluations.
The state of Colorado has even gone as far as passing legislation that requires the inclusion of
multiple student performance
measures in teacher
evaluations as well as the Unified Improvement Planning process for both schools and districts.
A: The TEACHNJ Act — New Jersey's teacher tenure law — requires educator
evaluations that include
multiple measures of student learning.
· Base teacher
evaluations on
multiple measures of performance including «value - added» data on student academic progress.
Assemblymember Shirley Weber's AB 2826 would have strengthened California's teacher
evaluation law to remove any possible uncertainty over the state's requirement that teachers be evaluated in a fair and meaningful way, using
multiple measures, including student progress.
And that's why we support locally driven
evaluations with
multiple, meaningful
measures.
How are
multiple measures used in teacher
evaluation related to one another and student learning?
The Texas Teacher
Evaluation and Support System (T - TESS) supports teacher instruction and student performance through
multiple measures that include teacher observations, self - reflection and goal setting and student growth.
OCR strongly encourages schools to develop «high - quality
evaluation systems» that «use
multiple measures, including student growth.»
I explained why the predictable result of value - added
evaluations, even when balanced by «
multiple measures,» would be driving talent out of the most challenging schools.
Implement
evaluation systems that incorporate
multiple measures of effectiveness including significant attention to student growth
Implement a comprehensive
evaluation system for teachers and principals based on
multiple measures of effectiveness, including student achievement
The NEA criticized the draft for including «no requirement for
multiple measures of school or student performance» and for not requiring non-test-based teacher
evaluations under the Teacher Incentive Fund, which doles outs competitive grants.
Established in the 2009 - 10 school year, D.C.'s IMPACT
evaluation system relies on a complex mix of factors to score each teacher, including both
multiple observations and
measures of student achievement.
The end goal is to use the information to guide in the creation of more effective teacher
evaluation systems that incorporate high - quality
multiple measures.
Combining
Multiple Performance
Measures: Do Common Approaches Undermine Districts» Personnel
Evaluation Systems?
We've taken collaboration to the next level to develop Eidex's new School
Evaluation Module — a highly automated solution that helps you calculate student growth data from
multiple measures and years.
She also supported districts in
multiple states to develop and implement teacher
evaluation systems that incorporated
measures of student growth.
«A comprehensive
evaluation system based on
multiple measures, including student achievement, is essential for education reform to move forward,» Duncan said in a statement.
Drew Furedi, an L.A. Unified official overseeing the district's
evaluation system, said he could not comment on the proposals because he hadn't seen them yet, but he welcomed their support for
multiple measures of teacher effectiveness, including test score data.
I think where you're seeing the most concerns are the states where teachers feel, rightfully so, that the test is too much a part of
evaluation — they're not taking the
multiple measures [into account].
When states were adopting new teacher (and principal)
evaluation programs, the National Association of Secondary School Principals advocated for
multiple measures of performance.
Marzano recommends using
multiple measures for teacher
evaluation, and urges administrators to conduct as many observations as possible, given the realities of most educators» schedules.
The most - positive aspect of Kline's plan lies with its requirement that states develop teacher
evaluation systems that use student test score growth data (along with other «
multiple measures) in evaluating teacher performance.
Known as the HEDI rating system, this approach to teacher
evaluation draws upon
multiple measures, including student growth
measures and observations of teacher practice.
The materials are built to dock into existing teacher
evaluation systems that include student outcomes and
multiple measures.
Evaluations should be based on at least a few years» scores.The district also must find a fair way of evaluating teachers whose students don't take the annual tests and should look at
multiple ways of
measuring achievement, including student portfolios and graduation rates.
He co-edited the 2016 book Improving Teacher
Evaluation Systems: Making the Most of
Multiple Measures (Teachers College Press).
We've been trying to implement a balanced and
multiple -
measured evaluation system for years now.
Basis Policy Research and ATI have built a partnership supporting the fair
evaluation of educator effectiveness by implementing mathematical models that include
multiple measures of student growth and which evaluate educator effectiveness using techniques that take into account a variety of factors that may impact student learning but over which the teacher has no influence.
Evaluations of teachers and administrators must use
multiple measures and lead to professional development opportunities that build the capacity of districts and schools to improve student outcomes.
Using
multiple measures such as teacher
evaluations, classroom observation and student test scores, TNTP rated about half the teachers in their 10th year or beyond as below «effective» in core instructional practices such as developing students» critical thinking.
Pittsburgh teachers acted in good faith to partner with the district on an
evaluation system that included VAM with
multiple measures of student learning.
As a general rule, as I explained in another CKN brief, it is often a waste of resources to collect
multiple measures of the same performance construct, except to the extent that additional
measures improve validity and reliability when used in combination with other
measures or that additional
measures are used in part for formative teacher
evaluation.
The New Mexico Public Education Department (NMPED) provides a framework for teacher
evaluations, and the final teacher
evaluation should be weighted as follows: Improved Student Achievement (50 %), Teacher Observations (25 %), and
Multiple Measures (25 %).
I also argued (but this was unfortunately not highlighted in this particular article), that I could not find anything about the New Mexico model's output (e.g., indicators of reliability or consistency in terms of teachers» rankings over time, indicators of validity as per, for example, whether the state's value - added output correlated, or not, with the other «
multiple measures» used in New Mexico's teacher
evaluation system), pretty much anywhere given my efforts.
West Virginia's new school accountability system includes a well - balanced approach that relies on
multiple measures of
evaluation for schools.
Requiring regular
evaluations of teachers using
multiple measures based on clear standards for effective practice,
measures of student achievement growth, and other
measures such as observations and lesson plans or other artifacts of practice.
Teachers want an
evaluation system that would provide feedback based on a variety of new
measures, including
multiple observations, student growth data, student surveys and teacher professionalism.
Rub 3: The city and state are now beginning to look at
multiple measures in their
evaluation of district schools.