Sentences with phrase «muscadel had the warming effect»

It's a great complement to a cleanse or detox due to the healthy dose of ginger and cinnamon, both of which have a warming effect according to Traditional Chinese Medicine.
According to ancient medicine, it is healthy in the winter to consume foods that have a warming effect on the body, such as cooked soups, beans, legumes and rice with warming spices and herbs.
But the reactive gases emitted by trees can also increase the amounts of ozone and methane, both greenhouse gases which have warming effects on the climate.
His results, published in 1938, suggested that carbon dioxide indeed was having a warming effect.
Besides SSCE, scientists have also been investigating stratospheric sulfur injections — firing sun - reflecting aerosols into the air, similar to the cooling effect after a volcanic eruption — and cirrus cloud thinning, where you thin the top level of clouds, which have a warming effect on the planet.
At night, when the air near the ground may be colder than that above, it can have a warming effect.
Starting in the next century, atmospheric carbon levels could begin to approach those of hundreds of millions of years ago, and have their warming effect augmented by a brighter sun.
If convection and evaporation were not present, I could see the argument being made that a slight increase in Radiation having some warming effect, however convection and evaporation do exist within the Troposphere and the rate of cooling the two exhibit increases as surface temps increase.
Whereas organic carbon particles have a cooling effect, black carbon, also known as soot, has a warming effect on the climate.
Oat also has a warming effect so it's ideal to eat it during cold months.
This is because ginger has a warming effect on the body as opposed to herbs that cool such as peppermint and sage.
Also good for colds and flu, it has a warming effect that and often wards them off.
(1) Of the other anthropogenic factors, some have a warming effect (other greenhouse gases such as methane) while others have a cooling effect (air pollution).
(e) How do we know man made CO2 has any warming effect?
Although water vapour is a greenhouse gas it had no warming effect at the surface where the vapour simply acquired the same temperature as the surrounding air molecules.
Hi Hunter I'm saying that increasing atmospheric CO2 will have a warming effect.....
The basics are: there is a GE effect; CO2 is a GHG; adding a GHG to the atmosphere MUST have a warming effect; the Earth is warming (despite your post).
Warming activists have tried to deal with this problem for their theory by asserting that over time a warmer atmosphere will have a warming effect on the oceans.
«If they are right, no greenhouse gas has any warming effect on any planet.
To me all the witnesses and senators are obviously persons of consequence but I don't think your excerpt shows that anyone should think he takes issue with this statement — «No one questions that surface temperatures have increased overall since 1880, or that humans are adding carbon dioxide to the atmosphere, or that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases have a warming effect on the planet.»
In other words, A VERY significant % of the American public respond to polling to indicate that they think that ACO2 has no warming effect.
I accept that the CO2 molecules in the atmosphere have a warming effect — I don't know who doesn't — and it's evident that human beings have had an impact on the climate.
The modeling and experimentation suggests that pumping CO2 into the atmosphere will have a warming effect, though how CO2 interacts with the various climate regulatory and feedback processes is extremely complicated and there's a great deal of work to do.
Of course several denizens on this board have denied CO2 is a greenhouse gas (by denying the greenhouse effect) and have denied that Earth has warmed (by claiming global temperature is meaningless concept) and denied that rising CO2 has a warming effect.
In over 6,000 words it covers a wide range of reasons why carbon dioxide can have no warming effect and only a slight cooling effect.
Basically the same process occurs on Earth and other planets, and that is why we are at a «standstill» — because all the extra carbon dioxide has no warming effect whatsoever..
As for AGW, that would be falsified if it could be shown man isn't having a warming effect on climate.
Of course that would falsify that man is having a warming effect (AGW), it would just falsify that the warming effect was not substantial enough to dominate.
We know that C02 has a warming effect.
They make a big deal that Jo Nova uses a headline «Man Made Global Warming Disproved» but then «admits» that atmospheric CO2 does have a warming effect.
Adding GH gases to the atmosphere doesn't make any difference to the incident light energy absorbed by the Earth's surface, but it does cause a partial blocking of the transmission of IR from the surface which of course does have a warming effect in the troposphere.
The very limited basic premise is that CO2 at certain concentrations can have a warming effect, but that effect is very mild and certainly can not account for the warming previous to the 1970's.
I suspect CO2 has some warming effect, but I'm quite sure natural processes can cool to catastrophe.
If natural variability is a sort of sine wave effect, and just moves the energy around, why did La Nina have a greater cooling effect in the recent period after 1990 than El Nino had a warming effect previous to that?
The PDO / ENSO had a warming effect during the period 1976 to circa 2000, then a cooling effect since about 2002.
Whereas organic carbon particles have a cooling effect, black carbon — also known as soot — has a warming effect on the climate.
In contrast, high clouds tend to have a warming effect on the surface and atmosphere.
«The conventional view has been that this whitish looking smoke could cause a cooling effect,» he said, «but what we are finding is these smoke particles could also have a warming effect
Sadly, this can not be sunspot activity because variance in this is short - term and causes variation in UV radiation — which does not have a warming effect.
At night the reflection effect is zero so the greenhouse effect and reflection of thermal radiation dominate and the low thick clouds have a warming effect.
This study found that black carbon has a warming effect of approximately 0.9 W / m2, while aerosol cooling effects account for approximately -2.3 W / m2.
«On the monthly timescale, clouds were found to have a warming effect on the surface of the Antarctic continent for every month of the year, which means that the longwave effect of clouds is larger than the shortwave effect of clouds for every month.
I make no bones about the fact that I am determined to stamp out the hoax about carbon dioxide having any warming effect, because it is a travesty of physics, a huge cost to society and, indirectly, causes thousands of deaths.
HFCs can have a warming effect 1,000 times greater than that of CO2 but do not damage the ozone layer.
If it is to show that moving stations has a warming effect, then it should do so — in the report.
Figure 2: The «before 1992 / after 1992 stations» from «The 1990s station dropout does not have a warming effect» (Clear Climate Code)
It's virtually impossible that none of it is caused by people, because we know we have increased CO2 in the air from 280 to 400 ppm, and we know CO2 (sometimes called «carbon») has a warming effect.
: 1 there is a greenhouse effect 2 that CO2 is a GHG 3 that humans have increased atmospheric CO2 to levels not seen for 650k and more 4 that this MUST have a warming effect 5 that the warming (pattern, rate etc) is consistent with GHG forcing
1 there is a greenhouse effect 2 that CO2 is a GHG 3 that humans have increased atmospheric CO2 to levels not seen for 650k and more 4 that this MUST have a warming effect 5 that the warming (pattern, rate etc) is consistent with GHG forcing 5 that climate sensitivity is likely to be around 3C 6 that, whatever the flaws of MBH98, there are numerous hockey stick reconstructions developed by numerous (and independent) scientists using numerous proxies (not just treerings).
Could you please clarify — because I have always found your little mantra about the war being over (which I now interpret as CO2 has some warming effect) and having to use pen and paper (which I interpret as writing and call my legislators) confusing.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z