The Pact (c. 717 A.D.) was supposedly made (there is some dispute among historians on the exact date and circumstance of its beginnings) between the Umayyad caliph Umar II and «people of the book» (Christians and Jews) in the lands conquered by
Muslim jihad.
Not exact matches
Muslims who stand against
jihad end up dead themselves....
A splinter group known as the Kharijites taught that it was acceptable to excommunicate and legitimize
jihad against other
Muslims, including
Muslim rulers, if they were judged guilty of the commission of certain sins.
An exception is made when a
Muslim land comes under attack or occupation by an enemy force, which renders
jihad or resistance an individual responsibility.
All three movements also have roots in violence, with the Jews justifying war with the «chosen people» rhetoric, the Christians justifying violence with rhetoric that they are saved from sin by Jesus, and the
Muslims justifying violence with rhetoric about
jihad for Allah.
Likewise, the majority of
muslims are not declaring
jihads on all non-believers.
But why should
Muslims care if Catholics wanted them to be a bit more «Sufi,» keener on allegorical interpretation of the Koran and the Hadith, and cooler on taking words like «
jihad» literally?
i also hate with a passion how americans will use
muslim and
jihad and al queida interchangeably.
I'd have to say, you can't compare the two, the majority of Islam's want to kill all in the namesake of
Jihad (not so much the American
Muslims).
The dangers include transnational terrorism fueled by
jihad and the growth of extreme Shari'a law in such key
Muslim states as Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia — all while the Iranian....
Persecuted Christians on Indonesia's Ambon island face desperate conditions and the world is largely ignoring their plight, said two Americans who recently returned from a visit to the island.As many as 500,000 Christians have been driven from their homes and more than 2,500 have been killed by
Muslim «
jihad» warriors who have publicly declared they will push all Christians off the island or kill them.Christians are fleeing into the mountains, flooding into refugee camps and clogging ports to wait for the few ships ferrying refugees off the island.
Elements of the Indonesian army reportedly are assisting the
jihad warriors.Drew Stephens and Brett Ferguson, members of Riverside Baptist Church in Denver were in a refugee camp on Ambon Aug. 1 just after
Muslim fighters attacked the village of Waai, killing two dozen people.
«As a
Muslim American, I think this is an issue we all need to work together on,»
Jihad Saleh Williams said as he waited in line.
Such are the principles which govern the relations of
Muslim and non-
Muslim nations and the code of
jihad — the Holy Struggle.
Among the doctrines which caused conflict between the Qadianis and the general body of
Muslims was Ghulam Ahmad's rejection of
jihad, holy war, as one of the principles of Islam.
It is much more simple than you can imagine folks... in every local mosque across America,
muslims are being taught something called «soft
jihad» which is learning how to exploit the opportunities
muslims have to litigate, and defraud the American system with great ease.
Because Britain was considered to be responsible for the dismemberment of Turkey and the overthrow of the Caliphate, the
Muslims of India were calling for
jihad.
Are we seeing this same mineset in today's clash of world ideologies (i.e.
Muslim world vs Western world) in the form of war and
jihad?
As he saw it, the struggle against Russia was only the prelude to the liberation of Palestine and all other lands which had once been ruled by Islam: «
Jihad is now incumbent on all
Muslims, and will remain so until
Muslims recapture every spot that was Islamic.»
Indeed a direct link can be traced from the Wahhabis to the Egyptian
Muslim Brotherhood, and from it to such groups of
Muslim fundamentalists as Hamas, the Islamic
Jihad and Al Qaeda.
Jihad — Arabic for «struggle» — is considered a religious duty for
Muslims, although there are both benign and militant interpretations of what it means.
The reason why
Muslim fundamentalists have become so judgmental of western secular culture is well described in a book by Benjamin Barber, entitled
Jihad versus McWorld.
If a
Jihad is called by a
Muslim leader then it is the responsibility in the name of Allah to take up arms... right?
The killing
Jihad which is what you are thinking about is only permissible in the rare case that a
muslim is not allowed to praise Allah in any way whatsoever and that killing can only be against that individual that is not allowing the prayer.
Fundamentalist Islam is at war with the West and its values of intellectual and civil freedom and democracy — and it actually takes advantage of those liberties to advance its
Jihad «holy war» by using tax breaks for religions to erect edifices or get subsidies for large
Muslim families that are used to sway Western democracies, and, yes, suing for the right even to build a fundamentalist mosque at Ground Zero.
any person in the right mind realizes there are
Muslim families that are «everyday American families»... but to impose their religion on others is dangerous... because the propaganda of the holy
jihad is a threat to our countries security... and there is a big movement... that keeps recruiting and teaching the young...
Hey buddy if you know one or two people who collect money for
jihad you should report them, not use them as a cute example of the broad spectrum of the
muslims you know
I would never be accused of being a
muslim lover, but Mo took Mecca peacefully through soft
jihad.
When we
Muslims said that those claim call for
jihad and those of Alqaida are shallow
Muslims and not are as our peaceful teachings of Islam by the Prophet Muhammed (saws)... no one believed us for that so why should now
Muslims believe that now it accured to you??!
The only widely accepted prohibition during the first
Jihad was to not murder the «people of the book», that would be Jews and Christians, but all of the people of the book would have to under
Muslim rule and could not do anything against Islam.
Understand, the overwhelming majority of
Muslim clerics around the world, renouse
Jihad with the west.
As we know Bin Laden called for a
Jihad, the 2nd
Jihad and made the distinction that this time the people of the book should expect the same treatment as all non
muslims which was coerced conversions under threat of death.
Given the size and scope of Islam and the obvious turbulence among many
Muslims, the previous question comes into focus: What is the meaning of
jihad?
The only wars I can see as claiming to be in the name of God, would be the crusades, or the
Jihad that extremist
Muslims have declared on us.
After 80 %, expect daily intimidation and violent
jihad, some State - run ethnic cleansing, beheadings, stoning, and even some genocide, as these nations drive out the infidels, and move toward 100 %
Muslim, such as has been experienced and in some ways is on - going in:
By the 11th century,
Muslims were far more likely to pursue
jihad against their fellow
Muslims than against Christendom.
All other religions teach tolerance, forgiveness and love and Kuran teaches «kill non-
muslims (Quafirs)», «declare war against non-
muslims (
Jihad)»... If this is your religious book teaches, no wonder so many
muslims are terrorists... and others stay quiet when their brothers bomb our cities and infrastructures.
well — if amhadis do not believe in
jihad — than how did this prophet propose to reform
muslims who do believe in
jihad (and / or violent
jihad).
i simply want to know how the «newer»
muslim phrophet (don't even know his name) taught his followers how to change the concept of violence as a means for
jihad and / or self - defense into something that isn't violent (if that is what he did — i do not know except for this conversation).
Oh, and Kaiser says that this is WAY different than
Jihad, or Holy War, of the
Muslims.
Second,
Muslims also do
Jihad against themselves.
You are making a hasty generalization by saying that all
Muslims kill non-
Muslims in
Jihad.
Do not think like a
Muslim and take the word
jihad into thinking that you have to blow everybody up.
to keep the record straight I am a Pakistani Sunni
muslim and support
Jihad against Hindus, Jews, Christians, Gays, Lesbians, and dogs.
Bin Laden's
jihad not only pits Islam against America, the West as a whole, and ultimately the rest of the non-Islamic world; it also seeks to overthrow the contemporary
Muslim states and mainstream views of Islamic tradition among the great majority of contemporary
Muslims.
please don't call me racist but for the record, I am a Pakistani Sunni
muslim and support
Jihad against Hindus, Jews, Christians, Gays, Lesbians, and dogs.
but for the record, I am a Pakistani Sunni
muslim and support
Jihad against Hindus, Jews, Christians, Gays, Lesbians, and dogs.
Such acquaintance with world literature and such exquisite sensibility would not be of note except for two points — that Shiqaqi was, until his assassination in Malta a few weeks ago, an Islamist (or what is frequently called a «fundamentalist»
Muslim) and that he headed Islamic
Jihad, the arch-terrorist organization that has murdered dozens of Israelis over the last two years.
They may be called «extremists» or «fundamentalists» by
muslim appeasers like yourself but, at the end of the day, they are always the more dedicated to the koran and following the path of
Jihad as mandated by terrorist / pedophile mohammad.
Where
Muslims are strong, you wage freakin Universal
Jihad, a worldwide WAR against the non-muslim.